1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's the justification for wasting time and lives by using less than the most effective effort then?

4
EatDatSideOfBeef 4 points ago +4 / -0

Country A: Says they can win a war in a couple of weeks

Country B: Holds off for several months and still hasn't been defeated.

People who only read Country A's propaganda: Wow, Country A is really using kid gloves and there's no other explanation for the apparent troubles they've been having

1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Turkish media also said that there were 5g activated bioweapons on the Ever Given when it was stuck in the Suez. Has that panned out yet?

0
EatDatSideOfBeef 0 points ago +3 / -3

You just gotta kick up the super think; Trump would only say someone is good if he wants us to know they're bad, and bad things only happen because the secret controllers of our nation think they are secretly good

3
EatDatSideOfBeef 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if Twitter's stock price were really tumbling, that's what Elon is rooting for; low stock price means the odds of him obtaining a majority stake in the company at his asking rate are better.

2
EatDatSideOfBeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

The newly installed President Trump will push the "Fraud Vitiates Everything" button and the world will return to how it was on Nov. 2nd, 2020

3
EatDatSideOfBeef 3 points ago +3 / -0

Crazy that on a board which prizes itself on being full of independent critical thinkers, you have to scroll this far to find someone who read and comprehended past the headline

2
EatDatSideOfBeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

He could just shut up... The whole "Trump is super pro vax because it's bad optics to be super anti-vax" idea has always struck me as a false dichotomy. He could have plotted a middle course and saved many thousands of overly trusting supporters from getting the vax

4
EatDatSideOfBeef 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the State NG owns them then they can keep them, but I'm guessing they shouldn't hold their breath for the Federal support that makes it possible to operate them any meaningful amount or access to newer models as time goes on.

by BQnita
2
EatDatSideOfBeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate to say it, but a bit of education isn't going to change the fact that savings and loan banks, regulated by a central bank and helped by things like the FDIC, have made problems like bank runs unthinkable to the average American. The status quo is that a checking account which gets loaned out has basically zero risk from the consumer perspective and provides a lot of convenience; switching to a monthly fee while not appreciably changing the risk from the perspective of a typical consumer is a losing game.

1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly the main problem with this is that the enormous proportion of the population is far more upset by a monthly fee on their checking account than they are by the idea, which they probably aren't even very familiar with, of fractional reserve lending with their account.

1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, I believe it would make sense to arrange banking into accounts where depositors PAY to have their gold or whatnot safely stored [and NO LOANS or other monkey business allowed on these accounts]

This is called a safety deposit box, and they already exist.

With typical checking and savings accounts the bank isn't just storing your money, they are also usually paying a bit of interest and, this is often forgotten, providing you a service by making your money more accessible. It's not free for the bank to pay tellers, build ATMs or to process all your checks and debit card transactions, so they need a source of revenue to cover those costs which is typically the interest raised by loaning your money.

4
EatDatSideOfBeef 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesn't help the fact the most vax mandates are at the State level or lower, and the federal mandates I've seen are for Federal employees or contractors.

Hate it or not, the same ability for Trump to circumvent the 1st Amendment when banning Federal funded Critical Race Theory also allows 10th Amendment violations in the OP's example.

I'm not trying to degenerate other legal recourses against mandatory vaxes, but this is dumb.

1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Historically, duels were fought with both sides at least moderately willing to participate; social norms of the time meant that refusing to participate in a reasonable duel was a damning blow to a man's honor and personal reputation. Nowadays, even if you made duels legal any cuck who got challenged could just refuse to fight and skip away without their reputation with all their lefty friends being damaged in the slightest.

2
EatDatSideOfBeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, Griswold decertified the election equipment for Mesa county, presumably as a part of her smear campaign to frame the County Election Clerk for spreading "false info" and "stealing passwords" as a part of Peters' participation in the Cyber Symposium

2
EatDatSideOfBeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, I don't know. I commented because the full text in the link OP posted directly contradicted the description he provided in the comment. My guess is the CO SOS is claiming that all interference which led to this decertification happened after the whole election process is over, but I haven't actually dug up her statement to see what her specific claims are. Considering her earlier attempts to frame the Mesa county clerk for leaking passwords and other info, it seems likely this is the next step in the frame job

8
EatDatSideOfBeef 8 points ago +8 / -0

That link says the equipment was decertified, not the actual election results. This looks like the next step in the Colorado SOS's plan to smear the Mesa County Election Clerk

0
EatDatSideOfBeef 0 points ago +1 / -1

So they were completely fine with what the cabal would do when they released their huge, election changing blockbuster but couldn't bear to violate a gag order while in a different, securely patriotic, state?

6
EatDatSideOfBeef 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it's that obvious, then why didn't whatever the bombshell which was supposed to come out before it got caught up in the raid today get backed up somewhere else where the speakers could access it?

1
EatDatSideOfBeef 1 point ago +3 / -2

And she didn't forward her blockbuster before she got on the plane?

8
EatDatSideOfBeef 8 points ago +13 / -5

So the big news which Lindell has been hyping for several days is that a rando Colorado county election clerk had her offices searched yesterday?

view more: Next ›