2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea If there's not an election we will be marching on DC armed, so, either way, I'm not voting early I don't want the Dems knowing how far behind they are.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea I have had far worse allergies since COVID than ever before, doc says your body changes over time, but idk. Mind you my doc is not a vax pusher either, she actively told people to not vax their kids.

5
Ecl1pseGST 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've actually thought that it "could" be possible if medical science got out of hand. Didn't think it would happen in my lifetime though, but now I wonder. Glad I played a lot of Nazi Zombies as a teen. I'm sure Commie Zombies will drop just as easy.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, most people have yet to admit that much, they think we "saved Europe" so, baby steps.

3
Ecl1pseGST 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, The Government^TM has been on the wrong side this whole time.

5
Ecl1pseGST 5 points ago +5 / -0

To note- we've been on the wrong side this whole time.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://youtu.be/QBeSNsyLuw8?si=vFvq3rqCA6tccCtH here's a video that dispels much of the exaggeration of nuclear Winter. I don't know a whole lot about this guy but he seems to know his stuff. Honestly I just don't care anymore. I'm far more concerned about having to fight a civil war if they steal the vote again. Or worse, living in a world where nobody was willing to fight that fight.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

That may be, but nothing in use today is remotely close to as powerful as even the 2/3 charge Tsar that was tested. The sarmat 2 carries 10 charges that are each 750KT (according to what we know) These are certainly devastating for a few hundred meters but no, there's no way it can take out all of France. What it could do, possibly, is take out 10 very strategic targets that would be devastating to France, but not wipe it from the Earth, nowhere near that.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most likely, yes, people in power like to keep up the "nuclear war would end the world" idea to keep the public afraid, and make threats like this seem that much more serious. I mean, you could say that nuclear war would end the world as we know it now, but not actually, literally, end the world. A Tsar Bomba at full 100MT load could take out DC and it's suburbs and bordering towns for like 50 miles, but the idea that 4 could take out the entire US is insane nonsense.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is risen indeed. Feel free to do your own research, but I can say my opinion has been formed by watching a nuclear engineer on YouTube who often posts about all the unfounded lies surrounding nuclear. Basically, the powers that be do not want nuclear because it would provide such cheap energy to us, and they prefer us poor. Chernobyl was terrible, so was 3 mile island and Fukushima, however, the things they taught us have made modern nuclear extremely, extremely, safe.

5
Ecl1pseGST 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thankfully, contrary to popular belief, there aren't even remotely enough nukes in existence to end the world. Nuclear Winter theory is complete bs. If the Ruskies nuked the libtard filled cities they would be doing us a favor. 48hrs indoors and then clean up the mess.

13
Ecl1pseGST 13 points ago +16 / -3

It infuriates me that the British gave up our Christian Holy Land to those Christ deniers. And that our churches have been subverted to teach the lie that these Canaanites and Khazarians are "God's chosen" which would be a lie even if they were real Hebrews. Under the New Covenant all those who follow Christ are God's people.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes a stock. It's traded around and it's value is totally speculative. The only acceptable replacement is backed currency.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +3 / -1

Crypto is nothing more than a stock. It isn't a real currency, it has no physical value, and nobody is entitled to accept it. Don't get distracted. Ending the Fed is priority number 1.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entirety of what we call the "Jewish race" traces back to the Pharisees. Boggles my mind that so many Christians have been convinced that these traitors somehow retain their Old Testament "chosenite" status.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's true, but, this name is such a same-ism that I don't see it being a big issue.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea so, this doesn't matter in the slightest. With the power of the Internet it will take all of a day to let everyone know what the new term is.

4
Ecl1pseGST 4 points ago +4 / -0

As someone his age I think the majority is strong enough to make that statement. Even when you see a group of us in a room with TVs, most of us have our phones out instead. Nobody I work with under 40 watches cable news. They might watch pieces of it on YouTube but they don't sit down after work and turn on the TV like our parents did. We hop on our PC or just watch something entertaining and maybe scroll our phone sometime before bed to check for interesting headlines, or posts here in my case.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

CIA. Not that hard to spell. And if they actually were out of power we wouldn't have had those false flag shootings. Who cares if they have a bot that scours the internet for their name? Let them be scared.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uh you really think so? Nah, no, there are plenty enough of us who realize the fastest end to the war is to cut off the head of the snake. And if they hide outside our borders we would never let them back unless they came back in cuffs.

view more: Next ›