Hey, that was a well thought out and worded comment and I sincerely appreciate your perspective.

I believe your characterization of the situation is accurate, though I of course believe I am on the correct “side.” Ha.

In any case, thanks.

I think I can speak for most of us here when I say we completely understand, and we appreciate you.

It’s easy to be passionate about this movement because our cause is righteous. But that also means it can sometimes be too easy to neglect the “smaller” picture, our own personal lives and those close to us.

We support you in whatever you do, and thank you for all your contributions.

You’ll be remembered.

Fair, but also, post 140.

“What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating with POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”

I’m right with you. I don’t make a huge amount of money but I work a whole lot and need very little.

It’s crazy that the average person doesn’t realize how much of their spending is completely unnecessary.

I mean... I’m it saying he doesn’t, I have no idea what he knows, but I imagine that if I’m John McAfee and I know who Q is, I would know that he’s not interested in being my fucking VP.

Know what I mean?

Great point.

I am of course apprehensive, we all are.

But these people are playing the long-as-fuck game.

We’re dissatisfied that not enough has been done in the last few months, or years (though much has been, if you know how to look), meanwhile these people are going forth with plans passed down to them from their FATHERS and GRANDFATHERS before them.

This is how you win a war, not a battle. We need to be strong.

MuckeyDuck is mistaken. The first “official” Q post was in response to an anon that said HRC was to be arrested.

Because of the way replies are often formatted on the Chans, the quote from this anon that Q was replying to is included in full in Q’s post.

This often leads people to believe it is from Q, but it is not.

Honestly, I think people should be able to do as they please with their own bodies (not an unborn child’s).

I’ve even heard/read solid arguments for assisted suicide.

I don’t approve of it, but it’s not my choice. It’s your’s.

But ENCOURAGING it?! Entirely different. If your identity requires you to start removing parts of your body, you need help. And I want to help you.

It’s unhealthy. We shouldn’t be celebrating it at all, and honestly, it should be stigmatized. Just like suicide.

It’s not something a stable person does.

I’m sorry you’ve been downvoted, I thought you were funny haha.

What an excellent and well thought out comment. Thank you.

You’ve said it more succinctly than I could, but I’m right with you.

Money is just a means to end. It’s what it can get you that some of these malignant forces are after.

Conversely, or maybe even similarly... I don’t care about money. The amount I amass means nothing to me beyond what it contributes to my security.

I am not rich by any means, but I have double what I actually need.

And I need very, very little.

Such a great and well worded statement. It hits every point that I, and others, would want to make.

Well done.

Yeah this is bullshit.

I agree we need to respect law enforcement, and many of them are good people.

But enough of them are sick fucks and/or people that would give you an unlawful order to where I’m not interested in obeying them 100% of the time. I’m interested in my rights.

I don’t think it’s a race problem. But there is a power problem with some police.

Thanks for this my dude. Right there with you.

Following it all as it unfolded live was one of the greatest adventures I’ve ever had, and I’ve traveled half the world.

The discussions amongst anons as the drops happened, the discussions with Q and anons, so much digging... I learned so much. Some on my own, most with the help of other Autist diggers.

Not that it was all fun and games... It was worse before, but I still struggle to sleep at night with the things I know running through my head.

But I’m glad to be a part of it. Been there since the beginning and I’m happy to see it through, whatever happens.

That chick is Tom MacDonald lol.

I think we’re on the same page, friend. The wording is just a little different.

Sure you can swat a mosquito, and there will always be more shills. I think we’re both saying that we’d rather be able to recognize them, which in this case neutralizes then, than ban them.

I, too, prefer they expose themselves.

I just hope everybody is paying attention and doing their due diligence.

Thanks for this post and your perspective. It’s given me a few things to think about.

Just a note though, if you know your Q then you might hesitate to call Snowden a hero of our Republic.

I’m certainly not the first to mention it, but it’s also 45’s birthday and Flag Day.

It has been clarified many, many times on every Q forum/board I’ve ever seen, including this one.

The arrest post is not a post from Q. It is an anon. The Q post is the one replying to it.

This was great haha, thank you.

I get what you’re saying, but again, I don’t mean the rulings of the court as a whole, just individual Justice’s opinions. The random general Leftist having a “right” opinion or a Conservative “siding with the left.”

I think all the rulings as a Court have been consistent with what you would expect. I haven’t been surprised.

Really you’re right, and I think I’ve seen some more actual Constituional opinions recently than recently and previously.

I’ve just been mildly surprised a couple times on some individual opinions, but then again I’m only familiar with the history of about half of them.

I don’t mean to be a dick, I actually appreciate how you’re digging and looking for connections, but I feel like this is a reach.

If you think it is a match because of different time zones (which has happened, see the Q Post that says “No name returning to headlines” or something similar, pictured with him with his hands up), then you should verify it, then post.

I also think you can’t just take two words from a tweet then find them in a Q post. Normally if that is a nudge or proof, the phrase in question would be emphasized in one way or another, so as to show that the phrase should effect some digging.

Now if you could confirm both, you might have something.

Again I don’t mean to be rude or anything, I sincerely do appreciate what you’re doing. And you are digging more than I am at this point, certainly.

I just think we need to be more diligent. We need to be rock solid in what we put out to the world.

And the world is definitely watching.

Thanks for your perspective, I enjoyed it. Made me think of something I’ve contemplated a few times though.

I like the Brits and the Irish, they have strong blood. They’re not afraid to have a scuffle or skirmish with the police, especially when they’re in numbers and having fun haha.

But the UK police are mostly unarmed too. Would the citizens push back if the police were armed and willing to fire? Would the police be as intrusive if the people were armed?

I’ve always liked the quote “An armed society is a polite society.”

Also how I interpreted that.

Sure we could’ve guessed how this one would go (though I am pleased there wasn’t even one dissenter, even though this would be blatantly unconstitutional but hey), but on other topics, as individuals, they’ve kind of been all over the place.

This was my question too. I don’t understand.

You even recite the oath at MEPS before going to bootcamp.

It also says “during the covid19 pandemic.”

So this has been a thing for how long..?? How the fuck are these people enlisted before being citizens.

Maybe there’s some program I’m not familiar with, but what the fuck. How can you let somebody be in the military and not be a citizen.... seems like you’re begging for a security issue.