3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okeefe Media @OkeefeMedia We are here to empower citizens through journalism. Subscribe & join us today! http://www.okeefemediagroup.com

Source https://nitter.net/OkeefeMedia/status/1636037876679860227#m

5
Francewhoa 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thats all I ask because you don't hear about whats happening here....👍

It is indeed hard to get real news from South Africa.

Related news, today March 14th, 2023, by local journalist at https://www.citizen.co.za/news/south-africa/politics/eff-national-shutdown-threat-da/

For those interested in NOT censored news from Africa, I suggest:

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +1 / -0

the real solution is to get rid of the scam called fractional reserve system and debt based FIAT currency system.

I agree that both the fractional reserve system (FED) and debt based FIAT currency system are part of the problem. Not part of the solution.

My related post about resolving the challenge with the FED. Titled: "Who OWNS the Federal Reserve? Who CONTROLS the Fed? RESOLUTIONS by RonPaulLibertyReport." Starting with a "total separation between banking and state" at https://greatawakening.win/p/16aT7see4X/who-owns-the-federal-reserve-who/

I still believe that credit unions better match the need of working citizens. Including credit unions with or without the FED and FIAT alleged scam.

I updated my post accordingly. Now I suggest four alternatives. The 1st one includes both:

  • Abolish the Federal Reserve. Get rid of it. Source at https://youtu.be/dg0aysCJZyc?t=16m52s

  • Replace the dept-based FIAT currency with a really DECENTRALIZED cryptocurrency (crypto). NOT a centralized crypto. Definitely NOT the centralized Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Examples of really DECENTRALIZED cryptos which are not dept-based:

1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +7 / -6

I do not support Devolution. Why?

  • I believe that there are much safer speculated resolution than Devolution

  • In summary, the Devolution speculation is that there is maybe laws in place that will resolve all your challenge. I do not believe that. Because if you look at the FACTS, the facts contradict Devolution. When I make a choice, if I can choose between FACTS and SPECULATION, I always choose FACTS. For example, right now, there are still laws being passed that are really bad for you. Those laws directly contradict Devolution. In other words, when there are conflicting information between facts and speculations, I usually choose facts. The facts do NOT support the Devolution speculation.

  • Because I believe that for citizen to have real security and real prosperity, the best strategy is for citizens to actively and peacefully resolve any challenges. For example, but not limited to, do your own research, listen to various opinion. Then make your own opinion. They make life choices based on YOUR own research. NOT on someone else research.

  • One of the core speculation of Devolution is that citizen should be apathetic and inactive. So that speculated "laws" will solve their life challenge. I believe the opposite. Thus, I do not support Devolution.

by BQnita
3
Francewhoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

For those not familiar with classic Evil Dead movie, this is the original trailer at https://odysee.com/@sandyparker:0/The_Evil_Dead_movie_trailer:3

2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +3 / -1

For those not familiar with this Winnipeg lab in Canada, it is called the National Microbiology Lab (NML)

"The CSCHAH is a biosafety level 4 infectious disease laboratory facility, the only one of its kind in Canada. With maximum containment, scientists are able to work with pathogens including Ebola, Marburg and Lassa fever.["

Source at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Microbiology_Laboratory

2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +3 / -1

GWP: "Trump Curse? Signature Bank Fails Two Years After Bank Closed President Trump’s Accounts Over January 6 Riot"

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/trump-curse-signature-bank-fails-two-years-after-bank-closed-president-trumps-accounts-over-january-6-riot/

by BQnita
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
by BQnita
2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +4 / -2

Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in? What can you tell us about what's happening now?

I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:


1. Moved Cash OUT of WF

Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.


2. Moved Cash AROUND WF

Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".


Looks And Smells Fishy?

Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.

My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.


Same Risk With Deutsche Bank

I heard similar stories about Deutsche Bank. Many of their largest clients are presently moving their cash out. For those not familiar with Deutsche Bank, it is the 8th largest bank in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

The largest bank in Europe is HSBC Holdings PLC, UK. Which was allegedly created to primarily do illegal money laundering for people with Evil behaviors. My instinct tells me that for people with Good behaviors, HSBC is by far the most risky bank to do business with and store cash at.

Source about the ranking at:

Lots of sources about HSBC's alleged money laundering:

by BQnita
1
Francewhoa 1 point ago +2 / -1

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

https://archive.ph/q2FMd#selection-727.0-727.149

2
Francewhoa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Video "George Soros admits Nazi collaboration in 60 Minutes interview - 1998" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKUlz-C5BG8

Anderson Cooper denies that this clip exists, but here it is. This interview took place in 1998 on 60 Minutes. George Soros admitted that he has no regrets over his actions.

Related alleged news. "Alleged" as they do not link to anything official from the Hungary's goverment:

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›