The judge should be arrested and any cases involving illegals and gang members should be reviewed for bias.
Him and his wife should be put in prison for the rest of their lives.
The comment about Johnson not seizing this opportunity to get some bills passed while 4 fewer Dems are off opining for terrorists, is spot on.
If the GOP had any balls they would do just that.
But, he send everyone home because they've worked less than 3 weeks all year, thus far.
He's the reason so many people lost their homeowner insurance right before the fires.
Pravda tried to spin it as it being the insurance companies fault but it was changes mandated by this idiot's office that caused the cancelations.
Almost like it was planned or something.
I'm sure it was just another coincidence.
I knew Fred raised him right.
These photos will make for great material during the midterms.
Why is it that the US FDA is so far behind other countries when it comes to food safety.
I'm gue$$ing there may be a financial angle in play.
And the judge was Chinese, as well?
Wow.
Blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment and multiple SCOTUS decisions.
It should be readily truck down, the issue is how long before it will be and the citizens are left without Constitutional rights.
The real reason has to do with human trafficking.
The reason the FBI stepped in and demanded his immediate release when he was arrested by NH police on suspicion of human trafficking.
Great post.
Saved for future reference.
Those photos of the traitorous Democrat chatting with the terrorist while he completely ignored his actual constituents that were being murdered by illegals, will be excellent material for the mid terms.
The optics are horrible and they will be used against them.
Then why pass the the 14th declaring slaves as citizens and why pass the Indian Citizen Act?
Wong was a legal resident not an illegal alien.
As a legal resident you are 'subject to the jurisdiction of' the US.
I thought we were going to enforce more descriptive titles?
This title means nothing unless you click the link.
The OR indicates either of those prior conditions AND the condition after must be met.
Even Indians born off the reservations were not citizens if their parents were enrolled tribal members.
They were consided to be under the jurisdiction of their respective tribal governments.
Also, although Indians had 'sovereign' nations, they still had to follow the Constitution and all federal laws.
For instance, you could not own slaves on a reservation once the 14th amendment was ratified.
So they were technically under the jurisdiction of the federal govt but tribal members were still not considered to be citizens.
There is even a case that was taken all the way to the SCOTUS where an Indian wanted to vote but was denied since he was an enrolled tribal member and therefore not a US citizen.
So yes, freed slaves were US citizens before American Indians were, even though Indians were here before there was a United States.
Same with California.
The Leftists are trying to drive out the middle class so they can have low income and illegals as their serfs.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
The word AND means both factors must be true.
A foreign citizen is NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
If anyone born on US soil was automatically a US citizen, Congress would never have had to pass the Indian Citizenship act of 1924 to give American Indians citizenship.
My grandfather was not a US citizen when he was born.
Birthright citizenship is nowhere in the Constitution.
It simply isn't there.
How do these same Commie judges keep getting assigned these cases?
Random selection my ass.
It's amazing that any lower court judge even has any say whatsoever when it comes to Article II powers.
I would ignore the ruling.
Both Pedo Peter and his Crackhead son should be in prison for the rest of their lives.
It all started when they removed shop classes in schools.
Then every HS started pushing college as the only option.
Yes, every politician that is involved with any sanctuary actions is guilty of violating US 1324.
I fail to see how parents having the option to opt out of these Leftist materials, destroying the separation of church and state.
As phrase that doesn't appear anywhere in the Constitution, BTW.
Giving parents control over what their children consume in school shouldn't be a controversial thing, unless you're trying to subvert the will of the parents, of course.