3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

True and it does seem they're talking more of a spiritual comeback and the pride to be American so I cannot argue with that!

4
HermitAu 4 points ago +5 / -1

I don't want an American Comeback, I want a new America. One that doesn't rely on the military industrial complex to thrive.

15
HermitAu 15 points ago +15 / -0

The Great Awakening is the phenomenon of the global population's collective consciousness surpassing the tipping point where truth and freedom reign over lies and enslavement. Like a snowball rolling downhill, it will gain momentum until it's an unstoppable force. In fact, it already has I believe.

Dark to Light

NCSWIC

2
HermitAu 2 points ago +2 / -0

To me it was blatantly obvious why Gates was buying farmland. My first question after Gates made headlines for buying up farmland was "does he have interest in Monsanto?".. Of course he does.

2
HermitAu 2 points ago +2 / -0

The question has to be asked. A victim of sexual assault would possibly have a lower chance of being an impartial juror which is the most important thing of all.

"Scotty David answered "no," the source said. This meant he didn’t have to answer the subsequent questions, including if he believed that being a victim of sexual assault would affect his "ability to serve fairly and impartially as a juror in this case."

After answering the questionnaires, jurors were questioned individually by U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan and asked to provide details about their background. At this point, the juror again did not disclose his sexual abuse history.

Victims of sexual abuse can serve on a jury, but they must disclose this history on a questionnaire if asked, said attorney Arthur Aidala. By omitting the information, the juror deprived the defense of the opportunity to further probe whether the juror could be fair and impartial and in this case possibly jeopardized Maxwell’s right to a fair trial, he said."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ghislaine-maxwell-juror-did-not-disclose-victim-sexual-abuse-selection-process

3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rates declined significantly between the 1850's and 1900 and again between 1900 and the 1940's so no I don't think improvement in detection was a factor. It was almost nonexistant by the time the vaccine came around to save the day.

It seems the key takeaway is that improved sanitation and wound cleaning essentially wiped out tetanus, not the vaccine. As for my indication that the vaccine caused an increase, I can't find the video to back it up and it's possible I was mistaken.

10
HermitAu 10 points ago +10 / -0

Before you do, a 2016 study suggested a booster every 30 years instead of 10 and a more recent one suggested the booster is useless if you were fully vaccinated as a child.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200225075120.htm

https://news.ohsu.edu/2016/03/22/study-shows-tetanus-shots-needed-every-30-years-not-every-10

3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I added more to my post, please check out the link. I may be incorrectly remembering the claim of a drastic increase post vaccine. I will try to dig and find the video in question. However it is clear that tetanus rates dropped to an almost insignificant number before the vaccine was created. 66% of tetanus cases were among vaccinated in one study and there doesn't seem to be any direct proof that the vaccine has ever prevented a case of tetanus.

9
HermitAu 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, but the rates of tetanus increased significantly after scientists started messing with it ~100 years ago. I'm sure I recall this being said and wish I could find the testimony video.

In the meantime, here's an alternative perspective:

"Tetanus incidence and mortality declined by more than 99 percent prior to the development of the tetanus vaccine in the 1940s. This decline is cited from medical sources in the book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? by Neil Z. Miller:

“During the mid-1800s, there were 205 cases of tetanus per 100,000 wounds among U.S. military personnel. By the early 1900s, this rate had declined to 16 cases per 100,000 wounds--a 92 percent reduction. During the mid-1940s, the incidence of tetanus dropped even further to .44 cases per 100,000 wounds. Some researchers attribute this decline to an increased attention to wound hygiene.”

Post tetanus vaccine history It is clear that knowledge of sanitation and wound hygiene are the main factors decreasing both the incidence and death rate of tetanus. While the tetanus vaccine was allegedly developed to prevent tetanus, there is no proof this vaccine has ever prevented a single case of tetanus. Tetanus is a problem of wound hygiene; not vaccination status"

https://proliberty.com/observer/20100317.htm

2
HermitAu 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny, I'm currently listening to Graham Hancock's "America Before" speech as I prepare to go to sleep.

https://youtu.be/GAccZ8eWhXo

"We're a species with amnesia"

Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson are my favourite discoveries of the past few years. Incredible. Undeniable.

The official narrative of mainstream archaeology is an absolute joke and was demolished by the discovery of Gobekli Tepe.

41
HermitAu 41 points ago +41 / -0

First thing that comes to mind: Tetanus cases were nearly nonexistant and skyrocketed to a "new normal" after a vaccine was created. Tetanus rates had actually declined exponentially in the decades leading up to the creation of the vaccine simply due to better sanitation. There's no proof the vaccine prevents tetanus or ever did.

I watched a 4 hour long testimony by a former vaccine researcher who had been working with the government since the 50's I believe. The video seemed old if I recall, maybe from the 90's or 2000's. That testimony was like a bottle of red pills regarding the history of the vaccine industry. It runs sooooo much deeper than Autism etc.. I can't find it, maybe someone knows the video and can provide a link?

2
HermitAu 2 points ago +3 / -1

I did hear this years back. His reasoning behind it was that not doing so and keeping your advancements to yourself was counterproductive for the progress of technology and thus civilization. Everything I've seen from Musk indicates that he truly wants nothing more than to see humanity advance, survive and thrive. All according to his personal definition these things, of course.

I personally would like to see our civilization take a step back from technology, reconnect with nature and simplify things in a massive way. Slow down. But that doesn't necessarily mean we should stop finding ways to ensure humanity survives in the event of a massive cataclysm on earth. Otherwise we're just waiting for the next ice age and the floods that follow, or something else to bring us right back to square one and we start again as hunter gatherers. Some may think that's the way it's meant to be, but eventually there will be an extinction level event like the Chicxulub impact and there won't be 2 humans left on the face of the earth let alone groups large enough to repopulate the planet.

3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hear you friend. I'm tired too. So tired that I'm willing to accept 20% public 80% black ops as long as it does mean an end to the rampant corruption and a real new beginning where media and politicians are truly held accountable for their actions, and the framework to ensure this is upheld. If this truly happened, global prosperity and peace would spread like wildfire. The alternative is rather bleak.

I agree with you on religion, but I know that so many here are very religious and their hearts are in the right place as well. If the "Church" can be spared, but the cancer cut out, so be it. They won't need the wealth anymore either so the Vatican's assets will naturally be sold and the wealth distributed globally to the people. Same for the bankers, I reckon they've got a buncha trillion dollars kicking around that they've pillaged from us and all our families.

4
HermitAu 4 points ago +4 / -0

Care to elaborate? I have thought long and hard on the "80% dark ops 20% public" thing as well as Q saying full disclosure would destroy the world and put 99% of people in a mental hospital (paraphrasing) and have my own thoughts on it but am wondering what you think.

Is 20% disclosure not good enough even if the other 80% do go down, it's just done on the down-low?

Part of me says fuck it, disclose everything, tell us all of it and let those of us who can handle it start fresh. Part of me says maybe partial disclosure is indeed the way go for the sake of the masses. I honestly believe the entire Catholic church would fall in an instant if all was revealed, for example.

4
HermitAu 4 points ago +4 / -0

And so much more.. The Dark Side of Oz is an incredible experience if you're into synchronicity.

2
HermitAu 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is my concern, an endless back and forth power struggle where sometimes we're "winning" yet the status quo continues behind the scenes. If we do not have a complete reform of government, media, crony capitalism, the military industrial complex and the banking system then all this is for nothing in my opinion. It's now or never.

3
HermitAu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Didn't a certain someone say US election would be secure 2020+?

If the mid-terms are rigged i'm going to completely remove my hopium IV drip, assume the worst and prepare accordingly.

1
HermitAu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Irresponsibly printing currency tends to lead to the type of inflation we're currently seeing and the hyperinflation that's likely to come but the 2-3% "regular inflation" has to exist in our current economic system simply because of the Federal Funds Rate and the fact that interest is paid every time currency is borrowed by banks. The whole thing is a ponzi scheme funded by the hardworking masses.

4
HermitAu 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's basically a remote controlled bug. Neuralink has a chimpanzee playing pong with its mind, no controllers.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/8/22374749/elon-musk-neuralink-monkey-pong-brain-interface

Watching this is haunting for me... Reminds me of how many humans already live... Menial task.. Reward.. Menial task... Reward. Repeat until you're useless.

7
HermitAu 7 points ago +7 / -0

The picture on the left is 30 years old and the picture on the right is photoshopped to look even worse than the ghoulish reality. Like what CNN did to Rogan.

7
HermitAu 7 points ago +7 / -0

LoL.. As normal as anything else we're asked to believe I suppose.

Great dig, it's almost like you found this one serendipitously.

7
HermitAu 7 points ago +7 / -0

Elon is gonna do with Twitter exactly what Trump did with America. Fix it.

Trump proved to us that everything is fake. An outsider got into power for 4 years and accomplished countless things that we had been told were impossible. Peace deals in the middle east. President on North Korean soil. Energy independence. The list goes on. All despite endless aggression from everyone around him including most of his own party. He made it look easy. He proved how easy it can be and how prosperous we could be in a world with less corruption.

I picture Musk doing the same with Twitter. Go in, analyze the issues, clean house. Take care of simple problems that Ol' Jack always loved to make sound so complex and impossible to address.

I wonder how many internal e-mails and documents were wiped and deleted in a panic before Elon could come along and take a peek at the real company policies and agenda.

This is fun to watch, at the very least.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›