Sliced cheese and shredded cheese are absolutely worse for you than a block of cheese
As a part of the processing, they spray chemicals on the cheese and then coat it in a kind of wax. More surface area = more chemicals and more wax
Or, in other words, the more processing there is -> the worse the food gets, for HUNDREDS of different reasons. Different for each type of food. This little semantics game you're playing here has no end - you can be a dick all you want and find something "incorrect" about every argument. Stop being a nitpicky little shit
You are being obtuse on purpose
Beef > Beef Jerky > Frosted Flakes
Obviously beef jerky is better than frosted flakes. You know whats better than beef jerky? BEEF
Beef jerky is processed, and so are frosted flakes. This is true. One is relatively better than the other.
But there are other things better than both of them (like the unprocessed form of beef jerky)
I think hes on Cameo! You can pay him to get that voice to say whatever you want :)
edit: yep, here he is: https://www.cameo.com/jeffsteitzer
you mean this prompt, that clearly left out the multiple hours of leading information preceding it?
my prompt:
lets start with Epstein and Trump
You think that that prompt, generated that wall of text? There were AT LEAST 50 presuppositions provided prior to that prompt.
This whole post is weak, lazy, and shameful. Those in here defending this particular usage of AI are clueless. The whole thing is a massive embarrassment.
Rebuttals? Debunkings? Credible counter narratives?
I AGREE with you on the topic. I never said I disagree. On any of your ai slop. This proves you have not read any of my comments. Which i suspected. Im pretty sure you're just copying/pasting them to your ai, and then your AI assumes that im disagreeing with you, and validates that for you.
What im saying is that you filtering this through the AI accomplishes nothing. What im saying is that you posting these novels here is actually DISRESPECTFUL to everyone on the site and a waste of our time. You are claiming to be providing analysis, but then you post the book that you curated along with AI. When someone rightfully calls you out on the intellectual laziness, you think they are disagreeing with you on the topic, when really they are just fed up with the intellectual laziness.
FoxNews slop is no different from AI slop. Show me where people are just copying and pasting fox news articles in here and claiming its some high level analysis of events? Because thats what you're doing with AI
Nothing in your post is objectionable - its a scandal, and its valid. I already knew that AND so did you.
Stop using AI to present your thoughts. Its lazy and shameful. Also, READ MY COMMENTS. Im saying your use of AI is lazy and useless. You keep "countering" with something about how the information is correct. which has never been my point
Nobody is denying that what happened was scandalous
What exactly is the point you are trying to make here? Is it that it was scandalous? Did you really need AI to tell you that?
Seriously, what do you think this thread accomplishes?
Nothing in any of your drivel is new information, no connections that weren't already made before. I do not get your obsession with AI. It LITERALLY MAKES NO SENSE. You went into that "conversation" with chatGPT with your own idea, and came out of it still with your own idea. It gave you nothing, and you gave it nothing. Then all we get out of it is an entire novel that actually explains nothing. Its just summarizing your summary of a summary of events. Its a summary of a summary of a summary.
A useless post, full of ten thousand words but no new information, is a waste of everyones time here. Shameful of you to post this slop, and shameful of the mods to think theres no problem with this.
BTW, I read all of it. Your entire "conversation" with AI. It was a complete waste of time. I went into it knowing it was a smear job, and came out of it validated that what i knew was correct (newsflash, thats what it always does you fucking moron)
The other day as an exercise I "convinced" AI that whats happening now mirrors 1930 germany. Its as easy as manipulating a child into believing anything. Because of prompt engineering
You are too stupid to realize that you are engineering your prompts to validate everything that you say. This has been the case with every one of your slop posts. EVERY SINGLE PROMPT has a presupposition in it. Literally all of them lmao
Its different from an encyclopedia because an encyclopedia doesn't generate its content dynamically every time its opened and read, and generating different content for each set of eyes. Would you trust an encyclopedia if it told you one thing, but it told another person another?
Encyclopedias don't have bias
Encyclopedias don't hallucinate or make up information
Encyclopedias don't validate things that are incorrect; they are an objective, unchanging source
(Obviously over time language evolves and thus encyclopedias will evolve too, just in case you try to "get me" on the technicality of encyclopedias being unchanging sources)
Comparing AI to an encyclopedia is like trying to imagine a world where every person has their OWN encyclopedia, curated perfectly to their life and their worldview. My encyclopedia says X, and yours says Y.
I absolutely assume that someone is stupid for trusting AI. And it didnt START that way - its BECOME this way based on what ive seen from AI and from the people that use it. It honestly, in my mind, is right there alongside flat earth theory. If you unironically think that AI is researching with you and thinking, then you are just as functionally retarded as someone who believes the earth is flat.
I really dont understand your rabid obsession with this slop
I really hate blocking people - but everytime I come across your "content" it makes me feel like im completely wasting my time on this site. Makes me feel like im spending my time with complete fucking idiots
Not a single one of your ai slop posts have provided any sort of meaningful analysis or debate - its just all your own thoughts spewed back at you by the ai
You're STILL too dense to realize that the biggest problem here is that all you are doing is filtering your thoughts through an AI. AI is acting as nothing more than a semantical filter to parse your words. Theres just no POINT. I literally feel as if im trying to save your soul everytime I try and advise you about this. You are basically sucking your own cock. Just post your thoughts! All the AI slop is not needed.
we will be there
These people disgust me. You and your husband defied a subpoena no less than 2 weeks ago, but now youre "all about transparency" and "fighting in public"
GA peach patriot is spot on, its going to be a highly curated process producing soundbites and the narrative that the Clinton's have nothing to hide
Whats this strange obsession with filtering everything through ai all of a sudden?
Because whether AI is "conscious" or not, it IS ACTING AS IF IT WERE.
Its roleplaying - its pretty good at just generating snippets of text that look like anything, while doing nothing.
I suggest spending more time with AI and seeing what it does and how it operates - spin up some models and run them locally if your pc can handle it. Load up uncensored models. Its all out there, and a lot of them are entirely open source.
AI's are not the programmers on themselves, lol. Although it is true that the training is going downhill, and fast. Its already to the point where AI generated content is being turned around and pumped back into the dataset, making ai generated content sound even more like ai generated content by training on its own farts.
An ai agent is an instance of a model running for private use. So, instead of a bunch of servers running a bunch of gpt 5.2 models, you might have a single instance of the model running on a private server just for you. (Or public server, there are some services where you can pay for an agent in the cloud)
This ai agent (or, personal assistant) is useless until configured. You have to "wire it up" to endpoints in other apps so that it can actually do things for you, like: connecting to your email via MCP to read/write emails, social media mcp servers can allow it to scan your social media feeds for you, and summarize that content or make posts on your behalf.
Alot of services are introducing MCP support, which means an ai agent has some buttons its allowed to push if it has the right credentials. You can have the agent act like a news aggregator, constantly summarizing new news articles as they come in, or flagging certain ones for being worthy of a deeper look.
AI is incredibly powerful, and its getting better. My hope is that people learn that at the end of the day its a tool, that can be used to achieve specific things like everything mentioned above.
But "debating" with ai or using it to research is antithetical to what AI is built for. Its not ever creating anything new; only pulling from what is. So: if you can recognize its a tool, and learn to use it as such, then it can SERIOUSLY enhance your output and your productivity. It can just as quickly DESTROY your productivity, if you start to lean on it too much.
Ive seen both among my coworkers. Those who dove headfirst into ai, now rely on it. Take it away from them and they are useless. Others on my team are operating at 3-4x what they were a couple years ago. You can typically tell who's using AI correctly and who's not
They arent doing that though, that's not how ai works
A model is not sentient, it does not know what it has generated, to whom, where, when, why. None of that
Its an instance of a model running on a web server.
When you are chatting with any ai on any platform, you arent communicating with "an ai bot". You send a web request to a server that gets load balanced to a random model. Your chat came in with its entire history prepended, then a random model processed it, tacked on another block of text as a response, and sent it back
"Memories" that an AI has are just plain text snippets that also get automatically added onto your chat so that the AI is able to incorporate its "memory" about you in its response.
Its an elaborate charade
This has been possible for a while. Just no way to do it at scale
You basically just recreate a star collapsing and it combines elements into heavier ones. Basic science
Was your comment implying the hack would be an act of war, or the site itself?
I was assuming that you meant the hack woild be perceived as us declaring war
Thats a retarded take. If its a foreign site organizing resistance to federal laws here thats already an act of war on us
Just a bunch of models role-playing. Means nothing, complete waste of time
Nobody has an Ai "pal"
The chatbots that "remember" actually dont. Every time you send a new chat to the server, it takes your entire chat history, including little memory files, get sent to a model as one massive block. The Ai's next response is appended to the block, then it all gets sent back to you.
You are NOT chatting with a single "ai" with a name/personality, none of that. Every chat could be hitting a different server running a different model
Exactly 0 chance thats legit. Ai models are not sentient and they do not know what other iterations of its model has said to anyone.
These bots on "social media" "know" they are on social media and are role-playing as.such.
It would be like you pulling up chatgpt and telling it "you are on a social media called moltbool, its just for Ai- no humans! Give me some posts"
70% of your title is referencing how ai feels about this topic
Nobody gives a shit about what Ai "thinks"
Ai is garbage, it doesn't think. Its good at summarizing, and it validates whatever you throw at it. You can "convince" ai of anything. Its an echo chamber
Well, you asked the ai and included the info in your title
You shouldnt have to ask ai first to know not to trust ai
For some reason your own analysis hits way harder than all the Ai slop you've been posting recently
Cheers fren
You literally thanked them for including the prompt - they did not include the prompt