23
Insignificant 23 points ago +23 / -0

The craziest part to me is that these are only the drop-box absentee ballots we're talking about. I can't remember the final numbers they showed, but it was more than enough to give Trump all the swing states. Now consider the other means they used like flipping votes remotely or destroying Trump ballots. The true numbers may be more unbelievable than we imagine.

4
Insignificant 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm watching it now. This is explosive stuff...truly brilliant.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

So her max sentence went from 65 to 55 years? That's not much of a difference at this point.

4
Insignificant 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've had this debate so many times in the past. This country needs to step back and learn English again. Definitions do matter, and in this case, a conspiracy can be described as the Chicago Bulls practicing secret plays for months in hopes of bringing down their next opponents. It's also a conspiracy when two parents won't tell their kids what they got them for Christmas.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is what was needed for them to reassert their medical rights, so be it. Right-wing extremists are blamed for everything anyway, so they can go ahead with the stories about how it was Trump supporters all along that wanted vaccine mandates. Then they'll be happy to get rid of them in the name of punishing the ones they think are responsible. Hey, at least he didn't capitalize "her/s". I love when they have no idea what the implications are when they tweet something like this. Keep the inadvertent confessions coming morons.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Who's Ellie?"

That was a great movie wasn't it?

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

It wasn't Orwell, but it's always attributed to him for some reason.

4
Insignificant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Many of them would freak out not knowing how to make a cheeseburger or chicken nuggets without a microwave, or how to survive without cereal or starbucks.

26
Insignificant 26 points ago +26 / -0

This is precisely why I posted this article. There's no doubt to anyone that's been paying attention that this is a significant event. Stay tuned.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is from the first few pages of his file:

"Because of Mr. Disney's position as the foremost producer of cartoon films in the motion picture industry and his prominence and wide acquaintenceship in film production matters, it is believed that he can be of valuable assistance to this office and therefore it is my recommendation that he be approved as an SAC contact."

On the next page it summarizes his idea for the Mickey Mouse Club: "He would like the first scene to be done on the range which would show the Agent shooting at a bulls-eye target and would be based on the fact that the FBI agent is a great marksman and would be something that the children would look up to."

https://vault.fbi.gov/walter-elias-disney/walter-elias-disney-part-01-of-03/view

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't read those docs in many years, but here's how I found them:

Go to https://vault.fbi.gov/ and search for Walt Disney. I started from the beginning and read a few dozen pages before I got bored.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably for the same reasons Walt Disney himself got involved in targeting an all-children audience. Declassified docs from the FBI say he was recruited to target children in an attempt to get them interested in law enforcement, but I'd bet the real reason is way more sinister.

6
Insignificant 6 points ago +6 / -0

If anyone tries to make the Nazi/Trump supporter connection, just remind them that Trump didn't start a war, but yes, his supporters also can get behind a strong economy with very low unemployment, strong borders, sovereignty from international groups like the League of Nations and the World Health Organization, nationalist-themed education for our children, playing host to the Olympics, defeating a great depression in a few short years, constant Nobel prize winners in every scientific field, a strong and well-funded military, an amazing entertainment industry that's fairly moral due to bans on certain types of pornography and the closure of gay bars, a ban on abortions, ancient decrees that hold the beer industry accountable, and strong animal abuse laws, then yes, Nazis were much like many Trump supporters. Of course that's only one side of the equation though, as you've pointed out.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Wiki page on Trump is hilarious. It's clearly a smear campaign. Then I found this after reading a few linked pages...why has nobody mentioned Ukraine's possible role in rigging the 2020 election?

"Since 2016, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and his allies have promoted several conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal. One such theory seeks to blame Ukraine, instead of Russia, for interference in the 2016 United States presidential election."

"American intelligence believes that Russia engaged in a years long campaign to frame Ukraine for the 2016 election interference, that the Kremlin is the prime mover behind promotion of the fictitious alternative narratives, and that these are harmful to the United States."

"FBI director Christopher A. Wray stated to ABC News that "We have no information that indicates that Ukraine interfered with the 2016 presidential election" and that "as far as the [2020] election itself goes, we think Russia represents the most significant threat."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theories_related_to_the_Trump%E2%80%93Ukraine_scandal

Since we know Wiki is as unreliable as they come, perhaps Trump was right again and Russia's liberation of Ukraine will expose more than we imagined...thoughts?

5
Insignificant 5 points ago +5 / -0

And Ford is the only American Hitler mentions by name in Mein Kampf.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing to see here...do your part!

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

And this is probably why the Underground Railroad ended in Canada, not New York. Had any slaves been caught in Union territory, they would be shipped back to their owners at the expense of the taxpayer. Lincoln made this very clear in his Inaugural Address. "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

The main motive for war is found in that same speech. He said "The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the Government and to collect the duties and imposts; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere." This is what scared Southerners the most. Now we know why Lincoln gave the order to fire on Fort Sumter to start the war. After all, that fort protected the customs house that collected a large portion of tax revenue for the Union to ultimately distribute unevenly amongst the states. It really does come down to money in the end.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed. The fugitive slave clause is largely overlooked in history lessons. They never ask why Lincoln vowed to protect slavery for all-time, or how he came to the conclusion that an anti-slavery platform would get him re-elected. The devil's in the details.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but only after he promised to protect slavery for all-time in his Inaugural Address. The Emancipation Proclamation was Lincoln's "last card" that was played after the Union had lost several major battles in the early stages of the war. His pro-tariff platform evaporated in less than two years after being elected. There is much more to that history lesson than is ever taught in school.

Why do you think they only focus on the Lincoln/Douglass debates? It's because slavery is made the issue while they were in a state that cared about that. I dare anyone to look into Lincoln's other speeches that took place in states that cared more about a railroad being built than slavery. The truth is that we humans tend to generalize about many things, and it causes us to believe a distorted reality that clever historians have put together.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree except for the common generalization that slaves were forbidden to learn to read and write. This was not the case everywhere, as many slaves stayed with their masters precisely because they offered a free education. Of course, they had a better chance of receiving that education if they were in the South, as the Northern slaveowners were particularly sensitive about their "help" learning how taxes work, etc. Naturally, there are many perspectives on this issue but my research puts the truth somewhere in the middle and leaning right.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›