Is quelle the chap who believes in the Q gospel? And thusly that the Q gospel is something to do with Q?
Perhaps he watched that thing that someone posted the other day about remote viewing. Did anyone see that? A chap did remote viewing on Q a couple years back which was really quite foreboding (a word he used which I think is fitting).
Perhaps Quelle saw that and gave up his whole theory and belief system around the Q gospel. He had been quelled.
Don’t ever doubt Trump again.
You shall not doubt Trump. If you ever feel doubt creeping in, just remind yourself that he is vastly superior to you and carrying out plans far beyond your puny comprehension.
Who did you even think you were in the first place?
Let this be a lesson to you fren. You are only allowed so many of these strikes. You will be allowed to be brought back into the fold of Trumps anointing but you must always remember to Trust the Plan.
No, it is your logic which sucks. Your obfuscation, your extraneous detail.
Let’s keep it simple for you.
You said that the reason Trump can’t be held guilty for the vaccines is because he didn’t get his hands dirty. True, he was merely the director, the string puller, the shot caller. He wasn’t the mid level dealer who goes out into the field himself, he was the godfather who had minions carry out his bidding for him.
If controlling things from the shadows and not getting your hands dirty is enough to render you blameless in the rotten fruits of your Labour then let’s compare it with someone who WAS declared guilty whilst pulling strings from afar and having others carry out their nefarious deeds - just to see if your principles are consistent or whether you are just one of those sycophants who fingerfuck themselves to sleep of a night to thoughts of your Adonis Trump and declare him spotless in all things.
Charles Manson, like Trump, never took part in the sharp end of his plans. But it was his plans, his influence, things carried out at his behest and according to his guidance. If your principles are in fact principles then you must also consider Manson to be guilt free.
But you don’t. And rightly so, because it was under his guidance that these things were carried out. So too with Trump.
The difference is that whilst Manson protested his innocence, Trump DEMANDED the credit. If he gets the credit for the vaccines such as he demands and he thinks they’re great then he also gets responsibility for the damage they wreak, because it was his decision to expedite the process and forgo standard safety protocols and to deny the general public any recourse for any damages they may incur as a result of taking these experimental vaccines.
You cannot have it both ways. As you are laying in bed tonight, thumbing your bumhole amidst your Trump fantasies, just ask him “daddy why did you do it? Why did you release the vaccines so” - see what he says. Press him on the danger aspect, see if he responds
Who said I viewed him as innocent?
I don’t and I used the example of him being guilty despite not getting his hands dirty as a direct comparison with Trump whom you argued could not be guilty because he didn’t get his hands dirty.
That’s why I posted the Manson question to you.
If you consider trump guiltless in the vaccines despite the fact that he was the stringpuller then presumably you also consider Manson guiltless on that same basis? Was the meaning behind the question, in expanded form.
You said Manson was guilty, proving my point for me.
I know morons have a hard time keeping track of their own warped and incoherent internal logic but come on to fuck man. You have to be a special kind of bozo to return to your own vomit in this manner.
Yeah. I’m Scottish not American so your country not mine.
I don’t think the riots were hyped up at all. They were completely downplayed weren’t they?
The point I was making is that those dem states knowingly permitted absolute lawlessness. A strong President with a true moral compass wouldn’t have just kidded on like his hands were tied. He would have went in forcefully and arrested all the political facilitators.
Push easily came to shove and Trump was found wanting, inactive, passive and therefore complicit.
That David Dorns footage was heartbreaking.
I agree that the ones who carried it out and funded it were responsible but Trump was the President, the most powerful man - not just in your country, but in the whole WORLD.
He COULD have stepped in. He SHOULD have stepped in. He did nothing and allowed it to burn in the final analysis.
Donald Trumps own testimony “I pushed the FDA harder than they’ve ever been pushed before” “I’m the father of the vaccines” “go get your vaccines”
Things that Trump done: instituted Warp Speed, pushed the FDA to forgo the usual safety protocols despite the fact that the testing phase resulted in 100% of animals dying when the testing was abandoned. Trump indemnified Pharma against liability. And, as above, he encouraged everyone to get them.
He is the Charles Manson of the piece, corralling everyone to carry out his evil deeds.
He begs to be given credit, give him it.
What have I said that’s untrue?
He knows what’s up.
Drag queen story time Satanic deep State handler time
https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/7198124cf373e5fd75b44e866718114b?width=650