3
JesusMaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is something called Normalcy Bias that affects how people react to sudden unexpected events. When people suddenly hear loud popping sounds, they think they might be firecrackers, but even though the sounds are gunshots, the people might have very little or no reactions at all. There’s a YouTube channel (Active Self Protection) that reviews videos of self defense/ use of force incidents and does breakdowns of what the people in the videos did well or not. You would expect people who are close enough to witness this stuff to fight or scream for help or run away but you will see people just kind of standing around not doing anything while standing in the middle of a gunfight. It’s crazy but extremely common.

Vincent Fuscia had almost zero reaction for quite a while. Shots start being heard, Trump notices that he’s hit, Trump ducks, SS dogpile Trump, swat guys move in, everyone sits down, then VF’s first reaction is to sit down.

1
JesusMaga 1 point ago +2 / -1

Those two men appear to police offices rather than SS, and they SHOULD have been looking almost exactly at the spot the shooter was set up as spectators had noticed the shooter on that roof with a rifle and notified police and SS several minutes BEFORE the first shots were fired. It’s not audible in this particular video, but While Trump is speaking, you can hear someone yelling “GUN! GUN! HE HAS A GUN!” Like 20 seconds before the first shot.

Here is a NY Post link with closeup photos of the police snipers, as well as a photo of the alleged gunman after he had been shot and killed on the roof (far away so not graphic).

3
JesusMaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two people are dead (one is possibly the shooter) and another is seriously wounded, so it’s very unlikely that msm will say this is fake, but that won’t stop Reddit and twitter

5
JesusMaga 5 points ago +5 / -0

It won’t, the evidence was live ammo from seemingly the same source as the live ammo found on the set of rust, and this batch of ammo traces back to the armorer and her father. It would be great evidence AGAINST her, but she was convicted without it.

Against Baldwin however, this new evidence is completely pointless. No one was ever claiming that he supplied the ammo, brought it onto set, loaded it into the gun, or even failed to identify it before rehearsing the scene (because he didn’t even check). The prosecution’s narrative of events is that Baldwin pointed a real gun at a person, cocked the hammer, and pulled the trigger, which resulted in the death of one person and wounding of another. That he knew it was a real gun, blank rounds were on the set, and that blank rounds can, and have, injured and killed people.

Finding the source of the ammo does not prove that Baldwin did not point and fire the gun, so the evidence is not exculpatory in regard to the actual charges against him. The defense could theoretically used the evidence to impeach the testimony of another witness, but who they would impeach or how that would be relavent to Baldwin and his charges, I have no clue.

Edit: here’s a link to self defense attorney Andrew Branca discussing the dismissal, it’s 43 minutes but starts right away https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EYNRR3wr3BY

6
JesusMaga 6 points ago +6 / -0

That speech was what is known as a “limited hangout”. When you want to keep something secret from the public, but that becomes impossible, you make a partial admission of the truth while holding back key details, and often including falsehoods and misdirection to divert public attention away from the bigger secrets.

Brennan rebranded chemtrails as “stratospheric aerosol injections”, said we should start using them (implying we are not yet doing so), and said it was to fight climate change (which is fake).

Edit: stratospheric not strategic

2
JesusMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are 2 that I’m aware of:

  1. Bush sr’s secret service codename was timberwolf and fbi director comey made a post about his dog benji passing away just before bush’s death was announced.

  2. There was a Q post about every dog having his day and John mcain’s death was announced on national dog day

15
JesusMaga 15 points ago +15 / -0

My understanding of what happened in the AJ sandy hook defamation trial was that they never moved past the discovery phase into the actual trial. The plaintiffs lawyers asked for documents that jones said didn’t exist and the judge issued a default judgment against jones instead of instructing the jury that they could make a negative inference due to jones not providing those documents, and that no witness gave testimony and no evidence was presented to the jury for them to decide if the plaintiffs case had merit or not

4
JesusMaga 4 points ago +4 / -0

I know about a similar incident from 2020(?) in Pensacola, Fl. A hurricane came through, shipping company had several barges (and a crane iirc) loose and some struck Pensacola Bridge (3 mile bridge) and caused a partial collapse

Edit: news article https://winknews.com/2020/09/16/section-of-pensacola-bay-bridge-collapses-during-hurricane-sally/

9
JesusMaga 9 points ago +9 / -0

According to Hollywood gossip, Allegedly, deniro and roman polanski were drugging people who were underage to have sex with, and polanski got caught doing that because he was at someone else’s house instead of his own, because deniro was using polanski’s house at the time. They both agreed that polanski wouldn’t have been caught if not for deniro, so deniro has been paying polanski off ever since.

2
JesusMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

Typically, the states that are not currently, or soon to be constitutional/ permitless carry don’t have as much reciprocity with most states as their requirements to get a permit are so much harsher than their neighboring states. Also I believe that North Dakota is permitless for residents only

5
JesusMaga 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it was Operation Northwoods that proposed using “hijacked” passenger airplanes to attack targets in the US and blame it on the Cubans to justify an invasion to remove castro. I’m not sure if it was the same paper, but I think it said something about taking over the planes, flying them into radar dead zones, turning off the transponders, then swapping places with separate planes of similar size and appearance (with duplicate transponders) that were remotely operated to be used as the attack planes. JFK said hell no and threatened to splinter the cia into a thousand pieces

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›