Seems like if one was so inclined, one could use this to ambush certain domestic terrorists who would harm justices for upholding the law…
Why mark the bills?
Just to reiterate, I could literally go make an “anonymous” video that states the 2020 election was rigged, DJT is the proper elected President, and the democrats have a reckoning coming. It would be just as valid of an authority, because there is no one to say who is and isn’t in anonymous, hence the name.
I repeat: the message is always more important than the messenger. To accept someone’s word because you like them is as foolish to disregard that of those you don’t. Determine if what is said is good or true on its own merit.
Again, there is no “they.” Assume each message from “anonymous” comes from a different person or group with different ideologies and goals. Sometimes those who use the “anonymous” brand will do things you agree with, and sometimes they won’t. Probably the latter more often.
It started as a 4chan meme.
Anonymous isn’t an organization, anyone can claim they are anonymous or send messages as anonymous. It is simply a veil for anyone to use.
As such, messages “from anonymous” should force people to do what they already ought: listen to the actual message and analyze it without an appeal to authority.
This board, like most of humanity, has an obsession with “who said it” rather than “what was said.” If you are a critical thinker, it doesn’t matter who said a thing, only whether or not the thing that was said is true or false, which can be discerned on its own.
Literally sounds like a drugged up homeless person ranting to the air. Incoherent mess.
Signal, or other rolling-SSL messaging apps are your best bet for privacy. To decrypt anything in the message chain requires the entire message history up to that point, which means you’d have to have already been a target by someone who can reverse SSL certificates (NSA, CIA, etc.,) from the very first message, which if you were, then no amount of encryption is going to do you any good. Or you’d need a man-in-the-middle attack (but again, from the very first message) which is easily known by mis-matching “security codes” in signal.
If you verified each other’s codes, then you have little to worry about. The encryption is strong. If anything leaks, it’s from other apps you’ve installed that read your messages on every app after being decrypted.
You have clearly missed the point entirely if you think A is a realistic option.
You must need a super high concentration of the oil, considering people throughout Africa and Asia chew neem branches all the time (alternative to brushing teeth for thousands of years) and they don’t seem to have issues with birth rates.
Neem is great for dental health / oral hygiene though — can confirm.
Good find. For others, “tripcodes” are just hashes (you can lookup hashing algorithms for details). You can think of a (proper) hash as putting meat into a grinder to make hamburger. You can’t turn the hamburger back into the original meat, but the hamburger should always be a little different and match perfectly with the meat that was put through the grinder.
Hashing is a process to generate a hamburger representation of the original data (meat), so you can confirm it is 1:1 with the input without needing to expose the original. However, if the exact hashing process is discovered (through tables of inputs and outputs), it is possible to derive the original data from the hashed output. To help prevent this, you can add salt (a custom additional piece of data) that only you know. This doesn’t make hash tables impossible, but if the salt rotates, it makes it harder to derive the data, because the hashing method will change, and you will have to start your tables from scratch (unless somehow you know the salt).
An extremely simple example would be if we were to hash numbers by multiplying them by 2. So we hash 4 into 8, 10 into 20, and so on. If we saw 8 and 20, we wouldn’t necessarily know the original values unless we figured out the process by providing multiple inputs and comparing outputs (which would be exceptionally easy in this case). So what we could do is take the user’s 4 and 10, and add a custom amount that only we know (say, 3) before doubling. Then 4 becomes 14, and 10 becomes 26. (This too would still be super easy to derive, but imagine this on a more complex scale). The addition of our own number is very much like the “salt” of a hash (or a encryption for that matter).
So that is the purpose of a salt. But in this case, the admins, who set the salt, now have the ability to change it in such a way that they can achieve whatever hashed value they like through trial and error. In the previous example, imagine Q has a fingerprint of 8, and the hash process adds 2 (the salt) and triples the value, so the “trip code” is 30. Well, if you change the salt to 4, the new trip code would be 36, but 30 would be the new trip code for a fingerprint of 6.
If the salt in the hashing process changes, the resulting hash should ALWAYS be different for the same input data. And if you are able to achieve the same hash after the salt has changed, there is something screwy going on.
Also a developer: use brave search with the mixin Google results option enabled.
Works well enough and doesn’t support the woke, marxists or deep state.
The process you just described is that of RU-486, the “abortion pill” — not Plan B which only attempts to prevent the release of eggs from the uterus using the same hormones that oral contraceptives use.
So even if you believe that restricting the development of a fertilized egg is an abortion, Plan B is not.
For perspective, IVF is closer to abortion than Plan B contraceptive pills, as many fertilized eggs are “discarded” during the process.
Plan B is not the same as the “abortion pill” which prevents a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterine lining by shedding it. Plan B is a high dose of hormones found in normal birth control pills that prevents eggs from being released and does nothing to prevent pregnancy if an egg has already been released and fertilized. It is by definition a contraceptive.
Some view all forms of contraceptives as akin to abortion and sinful, whether pills or condoms. Others only view abortion as removing a developing fetus from the womb, while most conservatives believe it includes intentionally preventing a fertilized egg from developing. In the latter definition, Plan B is not an abortion and should be considered with the same judgement as oral contraceptives.
Missed that. Thanks.
Ah yes, I see it now. 👍
The line is mid 2020. That’s not Biden’s inauguration either.
This is an astute observation.
Some would even say that ones own attunement will determine with whom you can commune in the psychic and spiritual realms, and that most are not attuned with the higher realms, and therefore will only be communicating with the “tricksters” and “demons” of the lower.
Many have lost their minds (and health) swallowing wholesale any messages they receive from such entities.
It is stated throughout scripture that Christ is within you — therefore be very wary of any message that comes from without.
Distractions. Both are very probably controlled op.
If this proposal is pushed to anywhere that matters, Conservatives will waste time and money following a Gabbard / Carlson investigation, and then when it inevitably amounts to nothing, they will all feel like they got a win, when they really lost in a big way.
Eyes on the China, Labs, Audits, and ahead to the midterms.
Story seems fake.
Any mirrors? Can’t load archive.ph at the moment.
The article doesn’t necessitate Putin being privy to the plan. His attack was clearly provoked. The attack could have been planned and orchestrated by NWO, and Putin could be acting to fight The NWO — they are not mutually exclusive.
Very good point.
I don’t think so. Doesn’t look like him.