6
LessSwampMoreMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because thats the only way they can argue you need to take it to protect others. If its just to protect yourself they lose any sort of emergency argument of forcing you to take it. “We must punish you because you’re harming others”

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Has there ever been a clinical trial to test for the prevention of transmission? Think of the logistics, you would either need to isolate groups with only select people getting a treatment OR monitor EVERYONE that someone in the clinical trial comes into contact with. Typically, there is the assumption that if you prevent the initial infection, you then prevent it from being transmitted. Once vaccine failures occurred, that assumption goes out the window.

Checking for transmission was out of scope for the FDA approval because the FDA approved indication was to "to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)". Absolutely nothing about transmission in the approved indication.

In a sane world officials/pfizer/moderna/hospitals would have been sued for fraud for claiming it prevented transmission or reducing hospitalization.

7
LessSwampMoreMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

There seems to be many of these Supreme Court cases that provide “justification” but completely goes against the idea of men being free.

If i recall correctly the case was citizens united and it basically stated corporations have free reign for donations but individuals are still limited (creating two classes, the elite and the peons)

6
LessSwampMoreMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

I keep hearing about violations of companies freedom of speech “rights”, but should “companies” have freedom of speech? I was thinking in the context of political donations, but if we banned companies from making political donations, is there anybody (or any individual) whose rights would be violated? Every individual person would still have the ability to donate, just not under the umbrella of a corporation.

Summary: Ban political donations from corporations, remove monetary limits on individuals. Re-evaluate freedom of speech protections on corporations.

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you remember the 2016 elections, the dems have complete control over their primaries and can rig them however they want. The GOP hadnt implemented that yet and were still slightly beholden to the voters.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why does when the primary occurs matter for the method of counting delegates? And why cant they just change that bylaw at the same time they change the date if thats the case?

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

No need. They have your blood spot from when you were born, available for “medical research” and forensic investigations.

5
LessSwampMoreMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Having had strep throat, i can say amoxicillin works and noticed a huge improvement within 24 hours. Cant say that I’ve tried oregano oil though.

1
LessSwampMoreMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I ate at a restaurant near a movie theatre this weekend. The parking lot and movie theatre were filled with 12-30 yr old girls dressed all in pink and taking selfies with the barbie poster. It was unfortunate.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, I don’t feel like it will be that interesting. I expect Oppenheimer and (unfortunately) Barbie to beat out Sound of freedom, and probably MI as well. I would love to be proven wrong though. It is crazy impressive that it did beat out MI on a daily though.

With that said the reaction from the MSM and the left to sound of freedom is pretty telling and could be used wake up normies. Hammer home the idea that the left is arguing for ignoring child trafficking.

4
LessSwampMoreMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

The difference is that I believe our side welcomes investigations to uncover the true cause of death. The covidiens absolutely do not want to investigate any further the actual cause of death, whether it be covid or the vaccine, because it would damage the cause for “the greater good”

1
LessSwampMoreMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are some that are oblivious to the evils, and their are others aware but cave due to the amount of money Pfizer pays. I have seen equivalent positions at pfizer that pay 1.5-2x over most other companies in the area.

7
LessSwampMoreMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

I just saw that as well. Looks like it tore the roof off the pfizer building and then some. That pfizer location manufactures injectables.

There are reports of injuries as well, prayers for them.

Archive link for those not wanting wral

https://archive.ph/MtKbp

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

exactly like a politician

You said this and it immediately made me think, what if politicians are just using this “AI” to generate their responses and talking points? Especially committee statements and lines of questioning.

I always thought it was coordination through staffers but this gaslighting by “AI” makes so much more sense.

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, the 2017 Las Vegas Shooter and the compound in New Mexico where children were found that was destroyed almost right away

7
LessSwampMoreMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ive been thinking lately about why the global elites want to have the great reset and why they disguise evil as benevolence. And then i realized when listening to the history of slavery, it had ALWAYS been the way of life until the civil war (as far as I understand) ended it out in the open.

I bet the elites are pissed they cant openly enslave people anymore like their ancestors could and are trying to find a way back.

4
LessSwampMoreMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

They have the potential to be another tool in the medical toolbelt, however, efficacy has been grossly overstated and side effects immensely understated resulting in a risk profile where most of the population would not want to take them if they knew the truth and/or it was not forced on them by the government. Combine that with the liability protection for manufacturers and you have a recipe for disaster.

Nevermind that all the while research into treatments and other preventatives (especially not-patentable) is completely passed over. NIH should not be allowed to have patents.

22
LessSwampMoreMAGA 22 points ago +22 / -0

I dont bring it up but If someone else does (or asks me) i am now firmly and unashamedly anti vax.

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

From a technical point pf view, it’s completely different. It’s unconstitutional because congress controls the purse instead of one person.

And no, just because congress votes for bailouts for other industries doesnt mean we agree with it. The covid “relief” bill was a complete travesty and essentially paying companies to implement totalitarianism.

Then theres giving money vs paying for services, though in government most of the former is disguised as the latter, hence the need to drain the swamp.

Sounds like you were hoping for some of that student loan forgiveness money. If you were, i wish you the best of luck in paying off those loans.

3
LessSwampMoreMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

It used to have to be work related. And vaccine injuries for work required vaccines counted as work related injuries and needed to be reported as such. And the only vaccine requirement by OSHA was for blood borne pathogens training (hep B series) and could be declined with a simple “I Decline” form.

But muh covid!

6
LessSwampMoreMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Redirect to the planted “conspiracies” that they want to use to discredit Q. If you search qanon you get all the junk that is controlled. You dig into Q and you actually get the information they don’t want the normies to know.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›