No, watch the guy behind Mitch on his right. He is watching her hand and smiling. John Thune and Joni Ernst are watching the woman and smiling. Also the woman seems to come out of nowhere and seems to leave the press conference immediately afterwards.
Q said they have control of events. It appears that allowing the 2020 election to be stolen is part of the plan.
Yeah. The guy standing behind Mitch on his right, John Thune, and Joni Ernst all seem to be in on whatever it is. They are watching her and smiling the entire time. There appears to be something on her left hand that she quickly touches to Mitch's right hand or wrist, after which he immediately freezes up. The guy on Mitch's right is looking right at her hand when she does it. I had to watch the clip on youtube with the speed at 0.25 with a lot of pauses, but the resolution is too poor to identify what is on her hand. I think I read somewhere that she is Senator Shelley Moore from WV.
Hopefully all other women's sports will follow.
Banning them from women's spaces will contradict their delusion. They must be allowed into women's spaces to be validated as women.
Not sure what you mean by prison is umbilical, but Trump just said he would institute the death penalty for child traffickers when he took office.
The real question is who has the actual blackmail material.
And Meghan McCain saying "they can't kill him twice."
Think bigger. This movie has been released to wake up as many people as possible. Human trafficking is the most lucrative industry on earth, and it operates with impunity because most people are unaware of it. Exposing it to normal people who will oppose it is the only way to shut it down for good. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Many of those people may donate to organizations to fight trafficking after seeing the movie, which they were able to see because it put money in the pocket of the movie theater.
Keep in mind that this movie was blocked from being released for 5 years, and it cost $15 million to make, which is low for such a quality production, but still a loss for the makers of the movie. Angel Studios and the people involved in the release were aware of the obstacles that would be thrown in their way. Ensuring the revenue stream for the theaters kept it playing until word got out, and it may have been the only way to make it happen. The increasing attendance after two weeks is proof of that.
I don't think your position is cynical, just short-sighted. It's criticism because you don't like movie theaters getting the money for an empty seat instead of groups that fight trafficking. You are entitled to keep and voice your opinion, but if it were done the way you preferred, attendance may have fizzled out in the first few days and the movie dropped. What purpose would that serve? Keep in mind that no one is required to pay it forward and everyone is free to donate to organizations that fight human trafficking.
They plan to shove The Great Reset down our throats. This is just the lead up to make us so desperate that we will accept it. Same gameplan as COVID and the vaxx.
Did they really elect it though? Or was it selected because it was controllable?
Right. Thinking that a minor can consent or that sex between an adult and a 14 year old is acceptable is horrifying.
Virtue signaling is free.
So did they give him the money after seeing the shocking success rate? (This is sarcasm btw)
I agree. During COVID my mother who complied with masking and the vaccine was reading a book about how normal Germans came to support the Nazis and did not even see the connection. So ironic.
Yeah, it is impossible to measure actual viewership. The benefit or tradeoff is that the film gets more exposure the longer it stays in theaters. In the long run, the increased exposure is should result in more viewers.
I suspect that the MSM thought that they could end the theater run with bad reviews and mockery preventing people from going to see it.
It sounds like Home Depot challenged his unemployment claim too. The letter from the Oregon Employment Department agrees that his behavior was "not a willful or wantonly negligent violation of the standards of behavior an employer had the right to expect of an employee", and that he was indeed fired for his actions.
https://justthenews.com/videos/elon-musk-change-twitters-logo?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social
Elon changing logo to X and dropping the bird, according to this article.
I had not thought of this possibility, but I like it. No upvote because you are at +17.
I think I heard that too, in one of his speeches. But he also mentioned that Biden had more to fear from the 25th amendment than he himself did.
I think I saw that a while back, but I've been unable to find it since then. Maybe that option pops up when you go to buy tickets but it isn't showing in your area.
Excellent
Lady in pink is Joni Ernst, I think.