3
MAGAdeburger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which US attorney’s office

It would seem that the answer is NONE.

A more logical process would be military tribunals.

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can a created being truly create anything?

4
MAGAdeburger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Would be a good time for people to review the Hamdi case.

Yes, citizens must be tried in civil court. However, during time of war (invasion, insurrection or rebellion) when civil courts are not able to function, then military courts have jurisdiction. Moreover, during ALL times, enemy combatants, even if citizens, do not have the right to habeas corpus, nor rights to civil trial.

The question is over who determines whether a person is to be considered an enemy combatant. This was explored by Scalia and Thomas in their dissents, particularly by Thomas. That discretionary authority rests in the Executive branch, not the Court. However as Scalia points out, the government cannot just detain anyone, not even an accused enemy combatant, indefinitely. So the government must charge and conduct a trial, whether civil or military.

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Men In Black, Westword, etc. tried to tell us... not necessarily clones per se, but certainly the theft/possession of bodies or impersonation/cloaking

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has the running document total hit 17 yet? πŸ€”

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other option was much worse.

Or there was the other option of not allowing for state and federal officials to enslave Americans. Had full power of the greatest military on earth... so we're led to believe... and yet, riots, war crimes, election theft etc. were all ALLOWED to happen.

Cui bono?

Certainly not us...

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Finally watched. Quite interesting. The whole incarceration aspect makes me think of ideas from Minority Report and Demolition Man.

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The late news story covers up the event that already occurred but was kept silent as to sow doubt. Imagine if the news first runs that lightning can be directed, and then the strike occurs? Accusations of intentionally targeting the mural. But if it was targeted, and the news breaks after, then nobody links the two.

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

The character known as DJT apologizes for nothing, doesn't even need to ask God for forgiveness after all... Never break character. Stick to the script amirite?

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Certainly appears to be the case.

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

1899 was quite the trip. Took me about 3 episodes to figure out where it was going but then it was interesting to watch how they got there. Massive messaging going on

12
MAGAdeburger 12 points ago +12 / -0

Shot heard round the world was the start of the Revolution....

Not really the most historically accurate statement. The Revolution was already occuring prior to Lexington and Concord. The escalation by the Crown that April morning was the start of something more... in short, WAR.

We've already been knee deep in Revolution (which is a spiritual and psychological event, as John Adams said occuring in the hearts and minds of the people) for quite some time. The question has been, when is our Lexington and Concord to explode the powder keg of a war of independence? Are we still waiting for it, or has the war already been going on?

9
MAGAdeburger 9 points ago +9 / -0

Never understood why any government official's resignation should result in then staying in their office for any period of time... this ain't some McDonald's giving a 2 weeks notice. If you're leaving, then it should be immediate.

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

And that begs the question, why would he say one thing in "private" and yet say and do another in public? Mastermind, or useful idiot? I tend to suspect that Zuck is just a higher level puppet, but nevertheless a puppet.

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Love it. Maybe chatbot can help me write all of the history books I would like to publish someday 😯

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I find it odd that Q would make the reference to the Great Awakening, which were Christian theological movements (which to note, all of which were precursors to massive historical developments impacting all facets of civilization), and litter drops with Christian imagery, allusions and verbatim quotes, and yet there'd be anyone attempting to decouple the obvious connection...

It would seem rather to be, that some of the apparently self-appointed keepers of all things Q (because how all got into such positions is still a mystery) are less interested in Q's theological content and messages, and have not only refused to endorse them but actively suppress it under gaslighting claims that Q doesn't promote them...

And yet, bullshit Lost Cause and anti-Lincoln propaganda is routinely pushed here by so called "Patriots", despite Q quite clearly having nothing but respect and admiration for Abe, and utter disdain for the Democrat, rebellious slaver traitors who tried to destroy this country....

I just find the inconsistent standards laughable, and that's but the icing on the cake that is lack of true transparency (why don't the logs tell us which mods took what actions?) despite claims to the contrary.

If this is really the "Great Awakening" board, it should function as such. The fact that anyone would be actively attempting to hinder that, is quite concerning and telling....

as NFD loved to say, curiouser and curiouser

3
MAGAdeburger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Content should only be removed for violating site rules. In this case, there doesn't appear to be any such violation. I've moderated several sites in the past. It's actually not hard at all, at least not for a competent person. You simply respond to reports by exercising wise judgement. Unless your post was reported, there should have been no prompt for action to be taken. If removed without being prompted, then this indicates intentional targeting of your content. In either case, without explanation as to the reason for removal, allows questions to be raised... not a smart strategy.

Moreover, if the content is deleted and removed, then why can I or anyone else, still access it and comment on it by simply clicking the link via the mod log? Logical deduction is that the content wasn't in fact, deleted, but merely a shadow ban on that specific post was enacted.

Issues like these only raise more questions as the nature of this site and those managing it.

Curiouser and curiouser.

3
MAGAdeburger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Out of curiosity, was this a chatbot creation? πŸ€”

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Humans have seen and interacted with "sky people" across all civilizations for the entirety of recorded history.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›