What if the goal is to let the wells fail, where it can't be undone?
- take a cabal asset off the market for a very long time
- hamstring China, who bought 90% of their oil
- increase market demand for US oil
Worried about unethical self-enrichment.
The Bank of England was founded in 1694 by Scottish merchant William Paterson, who proposed the scheme to fund the government's war against France. It was established as a private joint-stock company with support from Charles Montagu (Chancellor of the Exchequer) and Michael Godfrey, and approved by King William III and Queen Mary.
Just imagine ...
Some might say, "If Q is calling the shots, why would they let so much corruption go on, such abuse of social care systems, etc."
What if rampant SNAP abuse, rampant social security abuse, etc. was allowed to make all the illegals (and even legal immigrants) come out of the woodwork, sign up and abuse these systems?
How else would you justify sending back someone who was given citizenship free and easy by the Biden administration, or even the Obama administration? Let them abuse the system and then revoke their citizenship over it.
The entire fractional reserve banking system that has enslaved the world (entirely by design) was created by William Paterson, who founded the Bank of England, in 1694.
Because I know everyone is curious, he was from Scotland. Scotland didn't have any Jews at the time.
The current state of banking that has brought the world to its knees is a system conceived and deployed in Britain.
You're completely discounting Q from the picture.
You think all of congress doesn't know that no-name was executed?
When cops convert an informant, they know that informant will continue breaking the law as part of their immunity deal, and they allow them to continue as they were with the understanding that they will be implicating others.
We are watching A SHOW, full of ACTORS.
Exactly. They're playing their parts, meanwhile the sealed indictments are in the hundreds of thousands by now I imagine.
The thing is, Q said they need the population at the precipice. You don't get to the precipice without obvious corruption everywhere. The only thing we can do is rely on the fact that Q says they have it all, and that nobody playing the game escapes.
Its not equal.
If you can't concede that Vance in his days of the Senate was any different than Schumer, or Nadler vs Rand Paul, then I don't know what to tell you.
You're too invested in demonizing conservatives.
I already conceded there are bad apples, but if you think there are an equal amount of bad apples then your powers of observation are limited.
You mean ...
All those years ago, when Q moved to Voat, and we tried to settle down in our little corner of the forum ...
And the absolute retards would pour in, DEMANDING unlimited, unfiltered, unrestricted freedom of speech to say whatever they wanted to say ...
And forum slid every other thread, every other comment, with the most vile racist garbage about muh Joos, and when you tried to shoo their Nazi propaganda away you failed their litmus test of absolute unrestricted free speech where they doubled down ...
And if you said anything against it, you were the IDF ...
You mean those assholes were getting paid to post? I'm shocked. This is my shocked face, you can't see it but it is very shocked looking.
The left and the right aren't a wash out, equal, 50 50 culpability, no way.
Each side is responsible for catering to their audience. Politicians expecting the votes of conservatives are on a much shorter leash. Are they still guilty? Sure. Not guilty as often for as much, but they're still guilty.
Because leftists don't care, but conservatives aren't willing to overlook corruption in the same way. Conservative politicians that want reelection at least have to put up a facade of normalcy and responsibility.
What about 4?
I think by the end of this term he might have already had 3.
That is very true. I love it here.
The bots may seem mild mannered today on GAW because that's all they can get away with.
Back in the days of Voat it was brutal, having nowhere else to post about Q because we were chased out of everywhere else and having to suffer the stormfront rejects who had no restrictions on how vile they could be.
So I go look at the X account link X22.
First comment, from "Sean Stewart". Calls X22 an "op" aka psyop. Accuses Trump of covering up the Epstein files and doing nothing.
Go to look at this account's other posts and low and behold, muh Israel, muh Zionists, muh Bibi, and Severe TDS.
Accusing Trump of attacking Iran. Lots of pro-Iran propaganda. Anti-Elon posts.
The sheer overlaps on psyops with leftist bots is amazing. Same pro-Iran, anti-Israel drivel, same anti-Trump drivel, same "muh Epstein" drivel, same anti-Elon drivel, very pro-Tucker now that Tucker went off the deep end, etc.
The psyop is everywhere. The psyop pushers are dual purposing their accounts. There's absolutely no reason that 100% of the accounts in question all have the same talking points across the board.
Make it make sense that if you just so happen to be squealing about the speed of release of the Epstein files, you also just-so-happen to be extremely pro-Iran mullahs. What is the connection between hating Elon and loving the new Tucker?
How is it MAGA supports 100%, literally -- that is the poll, 100% of MAGA supports Trump according to CNN! and yet the accounts here at GAW, pretending to be vaguely pro-Q (so they should know better) are all against Trump to the bleeding edge of what they can get away with.
IMO, there are massive chat farms, or bots, or paid commenters, and its not just GAW its everywhere, everywhere except where they could actually vote in CNN's poll because Trump is 100% approval there.
The reports were Qatar paid Tucker, was posted here a few weeks ago. They're paying a whole lot more than Tucker.
How do you "freeze" crypto?
Can they freeze all crypto if they wanted to?
I thought crypto contained an element of anonymity.
To be clear, the SPLC paid people to hate Jews so they could fight antisemitism.
They paid people to act like the Jew hater bots on GAW.
Most normal people, after being told their ideas are repugnant and they're banned, would take the L and go find somewhere else they can post. The only reason they would create a new account and keep posting is if they're being paid to do so.
David Wilcock thinks you earn your salvation by having 50.1% good karma.
I say you earn salvation by accepting Jesus Christ as your savior.
You sit there trying to show how I'm no Christian but David Wilcock is.
So now there's only 1 question for you. David Wilcock says you will ascend by having light shown upon you by aliens.
FFS if you can't denounce his fruitloop theology for that alone, you're the epitome of bad faith arguing.
Jesus took a flog and ran around beating money changers in the temple. Jesus never sinned. It's called righteous indignation.
I tell you of what Christ did and said and you diminish it and say he wasn't really about that.
Pearls before swine.
You refuse to address a single argument in my entire "long winded" comment and decide you would rather tone police.
You're arguing in bad faith.
I heard you like Matthew.
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Matthew 10:34
Like I told you before, I've got a half century of bible study in my noggin. Come at me bro.
You're confusing indignation and righteous anger with hatred.
The same kind of righteous anger Jesus had when he whipped the money changers in the temple.
Or did you think Jesus had hatred in his heart when he did that?
Well according to you, everyone here is now aware that Israel has turned a new leaf.
Israel is making everyone aware that the only way to salvation is praying for forgiveness of your sins and accepting Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior.
Israel now begins their posts by quoting Q's prayers to Jesus. Isn't it a great day?
Did you ever think Israel would do such a 180, handshake?
THANK YOU.
I made a comment about handshakes coming out of the woodwork to defend him and HERE YOU ARE.
Thanks for making my point.
290 handshake saying I'm posting on behalf of Israel, your bot programmer's biggest flaw is conflating too many psyops per account.
You want to know what Q is about? This is Q ...
You know what Q was not about?
Everything about David Wilcock. He ...
- believed he is Edgar Cayce, reincarnated
- believed he communicated telepathically with aliens
- was witnessed by cops being crazy for several minutes before he offed himself
It's just being laid on too thick not to be the latest psyop. The sheer number of handshakes that crawled out of the woodwork on his behalf is the tell.
The other tell is everyone pumping him lately are pumping HIM, not any information he shared.
Oh yes, oh look at this guru, wasn't it suspicious how he died? He knew too much, oh no ...
There's not a single bit of info that David Wilcock released that's ever even been shared here, as far as I can tell. Why aren't you pumping information about him, instead of about how he killed himself?
You want information about David Wilcock's ascension? Here's some tidbits ...
Requirements for Ascension: Wilcock teaches that to ascend, individuals must be slightly above 50% "service to others" (as opposed to "service to self") in their daily life and karmic balance.
This is the part that pisses me off. You're conflating the doctrine of a hippy new age fool with Q. This hippy new age fool believes in reincarnation, did Q ever push reincarnation? He pushed communicating telepathically with aliens. Did Q ever suggest such a thing? If you're Christian then you know, those "aliens" he was communicating with telepathically actually have another name.
And what is the hippy new age doctrine? You earn your ascension by being 50.1% better than you are bad. Is that what the bible teaches? Or does it teach that no one can earn their way into heaven, that the only way to get to heaven is by accepting Christ's sacrifice on your behalf as you call him Lord.
- "Ascension" and 2012: Wilcock heavily promoted theories surrounding the 2012 apocalypse and "human ascension" via alien intervention.
Raise your hand if you think Q believes in ascension via alien invasion. Anyone?
How about you John Titor, do you think Q condones the philosophy of human ascension via alien invasion?
And yet David Wilcock is being paraded around like he's one of us, and that when fake Q said Ascension in Q post 4966 (all the 2022 posts and later were done by the Watkins IMO but that's another story) ... the notion that "ascension" meant aliens improving us with ray beams is the weirdest bullshit ever concocted on GAW.
There's ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about David Wilcock that has ANYTHING to do with Q ...
The psyop is conflating this new age bullshit with Q and Q followers. Get this crap out of here, its disgusting.
How much do the Jew-hating peanut gallery on GAW get from them?
Do they get a shekel for every new account they create after getting banned?
You're still trying to argue the bible features reincarnation? You don't even have the awareness to realize you're standing on an island alone with that opinion?
Find me any theologian anywhere who considers themselves to be a Christian that holds that viewpoint. Literally anyone, anywhere ... doesn't even matter if they're a bad Christian, show me ANYONE who agrees with you.
And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?
Is THAT all you need to establish the doctrine of reincarnation?
I'll take it easy on you, because it looks like you're trying hard to understand. Every baby born after Adam and Eve is born a sinner.
To help you in your studies, go to your favorite AI bot and type this in: Explain the Christian doctrine of every baby being born into original sin.
Not to mention the fact that the Apostles were wrong in their assumption to begin with, Jesus corrected them of their ignorance and now you want to hold their ignorant statement up as doctrine? It doesn't work that way.
We were being hardcore gaslit by the pro-Mullah trolls.
They pranced around here saying how unpopular Trump is now that he attacked poor poor Iran.
The accounts that really hate Jews, and really hate Trump most of the time, who cried for Palestine and Lebanon, who feared for Iranian children getting attacked by muh evil bad Trump ...
They were standing on an Island by themselves, they had the complete opposite stance of Americans.