No. It isn't problems with the neighbors. It's the tendency for officials to seek retaliation against those who voted against them. That is why the secret ballot. We already know how to have as secure an election as is humanly possible.
We don't really need to save it either. We should just use it while it's available, while continuing to work on true alternatives for the future when we do start to run low, or when something that is just better comes along. Whichever comes first.
The stupid idiots shouldn't be talking about their stupid shots to other people anyways. They thought this was going to be some kind of bragging right. It turns out that the unvaxed were right and they can't stand it. I might have gotten the shot if they hadn't turned it into some kind of religious ritual. It would have been a mistake. My habit of determining the truth or falsehood of something based on the behavior of the people around it has paid off before, and it did with this one.
They've got little boys scared that if they help carry their sister's laundry to the washing machine, they'll turn into girls. Vice-versa for girls. They present this stuff to the kids as if this just magically happens, but the kids don't want to turn in to the opposite gender.
That's just ridiculous. Also shows a basic misunderstanding of the people he apparently sees as opponents, the parents of the children. He apparently believes that none of the parents are armed, should he actually be serious about this threat?
I never thought they were riding this on a Sussman conviction. That's not me moving any goalposts. The goalposts were never there. Sure a conviction would have been nice icing, but the connections to the FBI and Hillary's campaign are the cake.
I think her losing was part of the justice meted out to her. She wanted to be president so bad because she thought she could rule the world from there. She's power hungry and she genuinely looks down on most people. Those people rejected her and denied her the throne of power, and she has not really been a significant player since. Yes more justice is needed, and the two their justice system they are forming must be brought down, but take the battle victories we score along the way.
That movie was the first time I'd heard of a kill trigger being employed. "All your records are safely hidden away. Due to attorney-client privilege, as long as I am alive, they cannot be released to the public." I thought it was brilliant. Also I liked the scene where, as part of his job interview, the made him determine how much they were offering him before he opened the envelope.
They did, but they are still saying the end product is global warming. Every discussion about this from them expresses concern that the temperature is going up. Not one of them is concerned about the possibility of it getting colder. In fact, all mitigation proposals, which are really just socialist standards, their real aim, are justified as preventing the temperature from going up x degrees.
Think strategically. When someone who normally doesn't agree with us, does, then add their voice to the push for that particular issue. The key is to find naturally occurring points of intersection and not to compromise our side to artificially create a point of intersection. This is the mistake the RINO's perform constantly. When our views do not intercept, we just go our separate ways on those issues.
I had never seen "2001, a Space Odysey". In "Tron" i didn't think they broke into anything, just somehow mysteriously wound up inside a computer game. The year after "Wargames", "Real Genius" had some pretty cool period tech stuff and hacking scenes in it. I first saw those movies when they first came out, and that was state of the art tech at the time.
As is always the case with these kinds of observations, we need to determine a history. Do Army recon planes frequently land in Uvalde, or was this a one time thing? The former increases the chance of a coincidence. The latter means it is highly unlikely to be a coincidence and certainly warrants further investigation.
Enforcement of their edicts would be done by small groups of armed officials. Each armed household they take on may result in the loss of one or two officials. They may eventually overwhelm that house, but then they need to move on to the next armed house and do it all over again. They would lose by sheer attrition as long as thr American public is so heavily armed. That goes for Democrats, any foreign would be invading nations, or any forces affiliated with the UN, WHO, or WEF.