Agree to go with your firsthand observations, but mine are different.
The study is the observation point we both share. Would you agree that the study indicates what the posts are declaring? Would you be surprised to see significantly higher cancer rates in a group of significantly older people (say ~5 years)?
I'm surprised he's running with this. Study just doesn't support that IMO.
https://files.catbox.moe/ay6t84.pdf
Look at the age breakdowns. Just doesn't make sense to extrapolate this conclusion when the age ranges differ so greatly across cohorts.
EDIT: I'd encourage anyone down-dooting to read the study introduction look at the table on page 5, and pay especially close attention to the age breakdown.
If you think I'm missing something as far as what the study presents, please break it down for me.
Do you have the details of the fenben protocol? Is mother in law still there? Did you have any exposure to other toxins that you're aware of?
Thanks again and I pray that you are healed from this and are with us to fully enjoy when Cankles and Soros are publicly charged.
Thank you u/ArmyLady for sharing your firsthand experience. It is incredibly valuable and unfortunately most of the time this info is lost.
If you could summarize your diagnosis, treatment, and timeline in full I'm sure it would be very appreciated and serve as a reference for other frens in your situation.
https://files.catbox.moe/ay6t84.pdf
Probably not a summary the study authors would agree with.
Some other factors to consider:
*They excluded folks who already had cancer: "Only the subjects who were admitted for the above cancers for the first time afterthe follow-up start were considered as new cases."
- The unvaccinated cohort was much smaller and younger: "A markedly younger age was observed among the unvaccinated (mean 45.1±19.7 years), compared to the subjects who re-ceived at least three vaccine dose (mean 53.0±20.0 years; p<0.001; Student's t-test for unpaired samples) or at least one dose (mean 50.2±20.5 years; p<0.001"
I'd be hesitant to draw any conclusions at all from this as that five year difference is critical. 45-50 you see a bigtime health breakdown in folks.
It really does feel like we're running downhill at this point and this cabinet is doing all the things we hoped would happen.
And a lot of folks do forget that there is a pretty explicit drop that what we know will be made known to the public. I sometimes forget it and think the plan will never be revealed, but it's right there in 34:
"Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted."
If you look on Polymarket you will see there are wagers that align with a lot of the Q stuff. There's definitely smoke everywhere.
Ok check out this photo it shows one door with 16 and the one next to it with 17.
Maybe the numbers were added recently?
Another image with the 17 at this link:
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/minneapolis-annunciation-catholic-school-shooting-08-28-25
Ok here is something to check, this image has a 16:
Maybe related to # wounded/killed?
The white hats repeatedly create these states of mental conflict/hypocrisy.
Just a year ago Democrats were crowing about how fantastic it was that Biden had removed RFK's secret service protection...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143223851
I can't even count how many times this has occurred. Seems like hundreds. I would think two or three instances would be enough for folks to get the point..
A+ proof and make sure to also check out Virginia's post itself:
https://cdn.anontools.xyz/screencaps/1319071346282778624.webp
Official confirmation of the Oct 21st release at the publisher here:
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/712958/nobodys-girl-by-virginia-roberts-giuffre/
Oh believe me I understand it's ripe for abuse.
But what Trump has proven is it's a lot more effective to have a counter-policy than no policy.
Examples?
-
Operation Warp Speed. Seeing the country faced with permanent vaccine and mask mandates and an ignorant public on the verge of embracing it, what does he do? Fund & accelerate the vaccine release, make it widely available, and let the public see for themselves how useless it was.
-
Embracing unions. It's not the fault of workers that their unions frequently suck. A Trump version of embracing unions means not having to compete against slave labor and having protection against economic warfare from nation states.
-
Interventionism as a cudgel. Trump is intensely involved in foreign affairs but to the benefit of civilians rather than feds/ngos.
-
Space Force -- rather than try to downsize/fight a compromised military, he expands it and moves the people he can trust most into a new branch. No cabal member is going to vote against a military budget increase.
-
Flag burning. Again, Trump goes on offense and will force democrats to defend the right to burn the US flags but not LGBTQ2SIA+ flags.
-
DOGE: built from the corrupt husk of USDS.
-
Tariffs: taxing the international elite to create the foundation for ending the income tax.
Defending universal gun rights in all instances is an enormously fatiguing position, and puts us at a disadvantage with the general public as they rarely experience the benefit of it day-to-day. But with ERPOs/GVROs, we'd have a simple & effective counterpunch we could throw any time the feds come charging in.
Think it makes sense to revisit this as it pissed a lot of folks off at the time--myself included--but as always in hindsight Trump seems to find a way to thread the needle on the most contentious issues.
The only thing I can imagine would make democrats/feds stand up for gun rights is the threat of them being taken away from extremely dangerous & mentally unstable kids who are being funded & trained as school shooters.
This policy would give republicans the foothold to counter-punch emotional appeals to end the 2nd that always come out after a school shooting: a policy that specifically targets fed-created assassins.
To some degree it's giving the left what they want, but Trump has proven he knows how to judo the feds when it comes to this sort of policy, and democrats would be stumbling over themselves trying to decide whether to fight it or support it.
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-trump-transgender/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Ass%27n_v._Bruen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rahimi
I'm not making any predictions or even inclined to offer an opinion on the policy itself, but I will observe that it would create a lot of chaos and force people to play roles they're unaccustomed to having to play. Trump thrives in that environment.
JAG
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5463383-military-lawyers-civilian-crimes-dc-takeover/
No more DC pedos prosecuting these cases.
Thx fren I see it here now:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1800328/000108514624002880/xslForm13F_X02/infotable.xml
It's listed as "TRUMP MEDIA & TECHNOLOGY GRO" under the infotable file.
El Salvador already seems to have hings under control. For us things are still in progress.
Without Trump's first months of action we wouldn't be in any better of a situation than the UK. It's pretty clear that every part of government outside of Trump is working against the public.
Can anyone find the name of the company that allegedly dumped their holdings? I see ARC Global dumped their holdings in September of 2024 but I don't see anyone dumping around July.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Donald_Trump_in_Pennsylvania
This video doesn't feel authentic at all. The average person would not know this info, especially an NPC.
It looks like Altadena, where this play was staged, is frequently referred to as "magical":
https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/378388/the-end-of-the-california-fairy-tale/
"The Santa Ynez reservoir, which should have held 117 million gallons of water for the Palisades, was bone-dry, having been closed for repairs around last February."
"Some of the allocations may sound like chump change, and I’m sure many of the programs are valuable, but then you get to wondering what’s sacrificed for them."
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/los-angeles-fires-eaton-altadena-community-1235232192/