1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

D-priv, Dallas? Could be something here but I suppose Cohen may just need some good people and figures a brute force job posting can't hurt.

Did you see the tinfoil on the moon of the San Francisco NFT at end of last PP Show? Guess we'll know in a few hours if it was any good. 🤣

6
merf 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hope this man gets to serve as long as he wishes and if he chooses to retire he finally gets some of the credit for being the bulwark of the court that the left has denied him for so long.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I didn't mean to come off as dismissive of your post. Rather just offering a comment on how the media is reporting on it.

6
merf 6 points ago +6 / -0

This seems to be a nothing burger. Just opening up the warrants to be exercised.

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are so many headfakes within headfakes there that I just have to step back and laugh.

I guess it would be Barr pretending that Trump is reckless for pretending to be worried about replacing FISA 1.0 with FISA 2.0, and cabal operators aren't sure whether they should be in favor of FISA 1.0 because that's great to use against people like Trump or in favor of FISA 2.0 because it might protect Trump using FISA 1.0 against them in a more covert & broad manner?

My impression here is that white hats operate like they have a checkmate scenario and don't really care which version of FISA is around, and that their broader interest is simply to have the public aware of FISA and how it's used, and the cabal gets to choose how they lose.

Also worth reviewing is Barr's "resignation letter", where the dude doesn't fucking resign, and Trump doesn't even classify it as such in his tweets:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614499981602819

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614514493878273

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/attorney-general-william-barr-resignation-letter/b82836cf0fe20bf8/full.pdf

Dates [start] will become important.

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2019/2019-12-09.pdf

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tbh most of the Q stuff is so openly discussed on Twitter now, that topics usually start there and move here.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well in the future I think it'd be worth having the debate. What is a proper oath of office? What does a valid one look like, what makes the Biden administration's invalid in comparison?

It's a good legal question worthy of some debate.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was brought up earlier but tbh I'm not buying it (for at least the subset of names I researched).

The only statute I could find says there must be a "record" of the oath of office. Doesn't specify what form that record must be.

There are videos of Harris and others being sworn in. Video IMO constitutes a record.

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.uniformlaws.org/committees/community-home?CommunityKey=4b7c796a-f158-47bc-b5b1-f3f9a6e404fa

Legislators blindly follow this organizations recommendations. They are essentially an invisible, parallel legislature. If you control UniformLaws.org, you control foundational legislation across all 50 states.

5
merf 5 points ago +5 / -0

18 months is ridiculous. Should be on the order of at least ten years. Would be worth pursuing legislatively if we can find the damn statute.

===

Oh wow no surprise. Uniformlaws.org rears it's ugly head.

"Uniform Property Act"

UniformLaws org is being used or controlled by the cabal. Everyone needs to become familiar with it.

The idea is it disguises itself as a benefit by creating commonality on "nonpartisan" issues, but the reality is it has a highly uniparty agenda of robbing from the poor to give to the cabal.

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

You definitely got something there with memeber

5
merf 5 points ago +5 / -0

Best timeline ever. This is so wild.

1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good eye. Not sure what it means though. Some of the "tied" posts are worth reviewing.

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

[Verse]

Woke up this morning, feeling kind of strange

Something's been happening, don't know how to explain

Doctor said it's fluoride, in the water you consume

Now I can't help but worry, what it's been doing to you

[Verse 2]

You used to be so wild, free as a bird in flight

But now you're actin' all docile, like you've lost your fight

I blame that ol' fluoride, messin' with your brain

Turnin' my rebel into a law-abidin' mule

[Chorus]

You've been poisoned by your water, it's a real disgrace

That ol' fluoride's got you dazed and in a haze

But honey, I'm here to tell ya, we'll find a way

To bring back the outlaw in you, and wash that fluoride away

5
merf 5 points ago +5 / -0

This seems like a bit of a hat tip to anons lined up with the FISA 702 debate. I don't think this is an actual declas event.

Just a wink and a reminder that things are on track.

https://rules.house.gov/bill/118/hr-PIH-RISA

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

What do you figure is the significance of the special access programs in relation to Hunter? Congress was aware of the attack on Russia?

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a bit too on the nose, but if there's anything Western investigators have been trained to do it's to ignore malfeasance at Burisma...so in that respect it's the perfect hiding place.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

u/#q4166

#4166 is far and away the most unbelievable Q post.

How on earth could the agency be what it is if 99% are good??? Makes zero sense...

I also notice that Q doesn't give the % of patriots working in ATF. 🤣🤣

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›