"Around here" is locked in a RETARDATION BELIEF IMPRINT that you're afraid might be true and therefore you're unwilling to investigate for yourself. It's this simple. What's worse is, the RETARDATION (your words) is allowed to persist because the topic is banned here on GA, I guess unless you're a mod and the post is to mock. Rules for thee....not a very fair playing field, eh?
I've been looking for one globe proof for over 6 years now running. So far, bubkus, nada, zilch. I don't know about you, but I could sure use an extra $90K in funds.
Wouldn't you guess there should be hundreds of irrefutable SCIENTIFIC proofs of the globe? I know I once thought this was the case. And then I went looking for them.
It's easier to fool somebody than to convince them they've been fooled.
We've been lied to our whole lives. This is just one of the more UNBELIEVABLE lies.
Wake up and do your own research. Once you do, you can no longer believe in the globe lie. It's this simple.
How do the mods "know" Brent? There's a 3 bitcoin reward for one single proof of the globe waiting to be claimed. Just one proof. There should literally be dozens, if not hundreds, if not thousands of proofs.
I myself looked for that one proof for over 3 years to shut down a buddy of mine that kept nagging me about FE. Much to my surprise, I was never able to find one.
If you've got the proof but are unwilling to try and collect the 3 bitcoin (~$90K), share it with me and I'll submit it and split the prize with you.
Whadaya say?
What a beautiful prayer - touched my heart as I joined you in your words. Thank you!
"The two utes"....:)
Ditto - fruits of a modern-day edumacation!
Vaguely recall my rant, lol, but I'm sure it was a doozy!
Everything changed after the coup otherwise known as the civil war. No more "nation states", "American" converted to "Federal" government, aka a corporation. Marx had made his mark with the right usurpers, no doubt.
I don't think the maga path works until another 50 million or so brainwashed sheeple wake up. Hard to believe but the vast majority still think everything is just fine and there's no need for any big changes in education, government, medicine, economy, etc.
IMHO, that much longed for "precipice" is still a ways off sadly.
POLIce -> POLIcy Enforcers. The state/government writes their policies that they pass off on the unsuspecting sheeple as "laws" that apply to them, otherwise known as statutes, codes, ordinances, mandates, etc. All are policies.
Way back in the day we-the-people had Peace Officers that were in charge of keeping the peace.
Solid meme. Should be circulated widely!
When a puppet ACTING AS the "president" of a geographic territory "declares a national emergency" about an imaginary boogyeman (phake unicorn-virus) everybody gets to disregard any and all MAN-MADE rules, masquerading as "laws".
Businesses were shut down, livelihoods destroyed, rituals were instituted in schools, the most important thing in our lives (oxygen) was severely limited, most especially for our children. Not a shred of science supported any of it. Literally not a shred. There's no such thing as viruses. They've literally never been shown to even exist, let alone "cause dis-ease", let alone "get passed" between humans. And as such, not a single scientific study demonstrated that "masks worked". There were no scientific studies that demonstrated staying 6-feet apart did any good. The term "asymptomatic carrier" was invented in 2020, once again without a shred of science to back anything of the sort up. The definition of "vaccine" was changed to support the new toxic poison being distributed.
All this to say, the doctors and insurance carriers can and will argue that they were simply trying to "protect society" from this deadly imaginary scourge. And the cabal-created LEGAL SYSTEM will back them up all the way.
Any STATUTE (which is not a "law", but rather a corporate policy) is easily superseded by another man-made policy known as a "national emergency".
Morality, common sense, decency, fair play and natural rights carry no weight and have no say in "matters of national security" which trump them all in the empire of lies.
Mine was poorly worded and unclear looking back on it. Your phrasing was crystal clear. In this ultimate battle of word games and "spell casting" (Information war), we need all the clarity we can get!
Nothing is "illegal" if you're in charge of inventing LEGAL statutes, codes, acts, etc.
However, it's entirely immoral and completely UNLAWFUL, which has nothing to do with anything "legal". World of the living versus world of the dead.
Great share OP. Unwinding the institutional brainwashing is an absolute necessity for people to make sense of what's REALLY happening today.
That's a better way to say it!
Scary question that would elicit scarier answers methinks!
I thought the story was that a frustrated spook dumped them on the autist boards a few days ago to prove a point or something along these lines?
Prior to WWII, what is now called the "defense department" was more accurately called the "war department" for good reason...
Well that's a possibility too I suppose. Between hotels and waiting rooms, that might account for 99% of their subscription base.
As I don't do "doctors" I never would have guessed this possibility but it makes sense. Good thinking!
Yep, that occurred to me an hour or so after I wrote the question. I think you just might be right as I see them at both these chains in their higher-end properties.
So in reality, USA Today probably has a "real" circulation of 100K at best....
Believe it or not; "USA Today" is the #1 Newspaper in America by total circulation - triple the circulation of our "paper of record", NYT.
I've never known a single person in all my life that reads this paper but I know dozens that read NYT as well as a couple dozen that read WSJ. Both of which are delivered in my neighborhood.
I'm curious if anybody here has friends/family/acquaintances that subscribe to USA Today? Maybe they give it away for free at grocery stores or something?
Interesting that you equate leaders with taking away freedoms. Leaders aren't rulers, and legislators are neither.
They PRESUME to be our leaders, and we blindly allow all they do. These "leaders" have managed to erode our natural rights over the past 150 years well beyond the point of recognition. Need we discuss anything beyond wars, taxes, "emergency acts", Covid insanity, etc. to make the fundamental point?
Those should be mostly administrators, and very limited as such.
I can't think of a single "limitation" they feel stifled by. You can step your way through the Bill of Rights and see none are truly upheld, let alone the essential articles of the Constitution. It's all been trampled under foot - no exceptions.
Some will argue that 1A is still in place, but is it really? Perhaps in your house or backyard but that's about the extent of it still being honored. You can't even say certain things on this board without having your account terminated. Now imagine what can be said on the major media networks, newspapers, social media, etc. Huge limitations across the board. The private company / public square argument continues to be deflected by our "legislators", in favor of the corporations of course. There are virtually zero free speech options at all. Gab, Bitchute (partially), Odysee. That's literally about it.
Many make the argument that the 2A is still enforced, but is it really? That you need to pass a background check is the very definition of infringement. That you can't buy certain types of guns but "they" can. Another obvious infringement. I don't think I need go on...
How did we get here if not by the actions or inactions of our leaders and legislators? Covid proved they could get the brainwashed populace to follow along with anything they suggested, and they knew the populace would handle the enforcement of their desires (via peer/public pressure). All they had to do was prevent any open dialogue and counter-narratives from ever reaching media outlets and the rest took care of itself.
The complacency of the people allowed elected public servants to start behaving as rulers.
Brainwashing and propaganda deployed by the highest "elected officials" enabled this.
This was enabled by the indoctrination of students within a system guaranteed to keep them unthinking and ignorant.
Agreed, but this was late in the game, 1920s/1930s at the earliest. The systemic brainwashing of the adult population was already well under way for at least 50 years by the time Rockefeller education started to enter the picture.
Note the sharp change between the inventive boom of the 1800s with the decline by the 1900s. Check when public schools were mandated.
There was actually an explosion of inventions in the 1900-1930 timeframe. A long, long list. I don't know when public schools were mandated, but I'd guess even later than this - post WWII for sure I'd surmise.
Baseline, the educational system requires extreme overhaul
It's going to be eliminated altogether within the next 20 years IMHO. That is, in any way resembling what exists today. Society will "regress" (which is really "progress" in relation to now) back to simple living in balance with nature when today's madness ceases to be.
As to your final paragraphs, everybody needs to essentially mind their own business, adhere to the golden rule and follow their bliss. Nothing short of this will do. And I firmly believe we're heading in this direction but it will take at least a generation or two to see tangible evidence of it. The obstacle is, we live in a society almost singularly based on the acquisition of money which causes all the antagonistic behaviors that are counter to this simple set of rules.
And don't get me wrong, I do get it that "it seems impossible and hopelessly deluded to think we can get from here to there". It must happen in stages of course.
The fundamental fix for it all is the masses taking back their power that is currently being unwittingly given away to our "leaders". And that can only begin after the masses recognize how profoundly they've been deceived on virtually everything they've been taught that they can't easily verify for themselves that gives the "leaders" a distinct advantage over the serfs. And this entails a long, long list that cuts to the core of every institution, bar none.
The "federal government" was established as a "business" from the get go. It had 19 clearly enumerated duties to fulfill, everything else fell back to the independent nation states. The elected representatives (Congressmen, Senators) were put in place to keep this "business" operating properly, fulfilling the wishes of the people of the states. All "legislation" these elected representatives passed applied solely and completely to the EMPLOYEES of this business (federal government) - having not a single thing to do with the population. Put simply; statutes, acts and codes were meant to be CORPORATE POLICIES exclusively applicable to federal employees only.
And look what we have now. Hundreds if not thousands of "federal agencies" and 92 MILLION statutes on the books later, the vast majority of which infringe upon and/or impinge our natural freedoms in one way or another. They're so universal and prevalent, we don't even notice them. It's just the "way it is", right?
It's at about this time when I often hear "well name one country that has it better than us?" I totally get it. We have more freedoms than any other country in the western world as far as I'm aware. But we're all under the thumb of the cabal ultimately.
Back in them thar olden' days, the county sheriff was the "top dog" and highest "official" of the land he oversaw. While by no means a perfect system, it was vastly superior to what we have today. The state government's duties and role in daily life were vastly diminished in comparison, really only having powers to regulate intra-county activities by and large. The federal government of course had zero authority/influence other than over federal employees in the county of course. And this system worked quite well for decades. If you didn't like the rules/laws being enforced by the sheriff in your county, you could move a few miles to a county. There was no need to expatriate under these circumstances. The county with the least restrictive sets of county rules/laws would attract the majority of the people to it. The sheriffs overstepping their powers would lose their next election. A near perfect system of checks and balances.
I believe this is the direction we're headed. There will be some sort of balkanization in the not-too-distant future as more and more wake up to the bassackwards, completely inverted system of government we somehow allowed to take hold. I've got some crazy theories as to how this was all allowed to happen. I'll only suggest that some form of mass collective brainwashing had to have happened that put everybody to sleep. And as such, we appear to be in the very early stages of the "Great Awakening".
Here's hoping we're about to shift this puppy into second gear soon!
there must be leaders
Who says so?
Regardless of one's best intentions, the very act of "ruling over others" starts the individual down the dark/negative path. It's universal law.
"The golden rule" is the only "law" we need and it doesn't require any "leader" to enforce.
Additionally, think carefully about whether you have the RIGHT to take away the freedoms/property/choices of another man/woman. If nobody gave you that right, then how is it possible you can somehow give such a RIGHT to an "elected official"?
It's not possible. Do you see?
Thus, by believing in a false "right" of the "leader" to take away rights of others, all voters in these systems of government bear some responsibility for breaking this universal law as well.
This is more or less what the founding fathers set up in 1776. The "President" was nothing more than the CEO of a company/business that was tasked with carrying out 19 enumerated tasks. Neither the "President", nor Congress, nor the Supreme Court were set up to make any rules restricting the freedoms of the people inhabiting the sovereign states. All the "legislative" rules created were corporate by-laws to hold the "government" employees in check. Their Acts and Codes had nothing to do with the people, quite naturally.
Why would "The People" want to vote for someone that could turn around and restrict their rights? Makes no sense at all... does it?
The choice to "rule over others" leads the individual down the dark/negative path as a matter of natural universal law as taking control over the fate/destiny/affairs of others breaks natural/universal/God's law of free will.
Thus, no "leader/president/chancellor/premier/emperor/king/queen/etc. can avoid this fate...
The AIDS/HIV scam (no such thing as boogeyman-viruses) is a great example of what they think about trans/homosexual/minorities. Millions were slaughtered with the toxic, deadly poison known as AZT.
It's all a deception Brent.
Wouldn't you think we'd have a couple hundred space cameras on satellites at this stage of our technological evolution? Live feeds offering 24x7x365 views of the earth with over 30,000 satellites, both public and private now allegedly orbiting? Imagine the advertising opportunities alone! NASA could rake in kajillions and stop wasting taxpayer money on their endeavors alone.
Why don't the folks on the ISS take their own video cameras up and shoot a nice 90-minute video of their supposed one revolution around the earth? Heck, why doesn't the ISS have a permanent video running 24x7?
Something as simple as this would put the whole situation to rest, wouldn't it?
The realm we live in is far more complex than you imagine with your "no pictures of flat earth" complaint. For starters, it appears we cannot get any higher than perhaps 100 miles above the surface. Nobody knows this for sure but it seems there's a limit as to how high we can go - as if there's a barrier of some sort above us - dare I say a "firmament"?
As to your "proof" complaint, the challenge is to produce some SCIENTIFIC evidence, not pictures and videos that anybody could claim are fake. Surely there's some irrefutable scientific experiments that can prove the ball, curvature, rotation, earth moving, etc. Right?
Even the sham artist Einstein was forced to admit in his time that there was no way to scientifically prove the earth was moving or rotating. Nothing has changed since either. As it turns out, all the scientific experiments demonstrate that the earth is still and motionless. An inconvenient truth that the establishment works hard at keeping hidden I might add.
Now, as to Q and his response to the very basic question. I'm of the belief that the "earth realm" is indeed not "flat" and likely a sphere or oblate sperhiod. This realm includes both that which is above and below what we know of as "earth". I also believe this "earth realm" is indeed encased in a sort of bubble-like (firmament) wrapper of sorts. Of course I can't prove any of this. It's speculation. But my point is, Q could very well argue that the "earth realm" is anything but "flat" and I would agree. However, the 6 continents and 4 oceans we're all familiar with are definitely "flat" and there are zero scientific experiments that demonstrate otherwise. What passes for "science" in academia today are mathematical models and abstractions based on many ASSUMPTIONS that are baked into their models. Real science doesn't stand on assumptions and this is how we know we're being lied to about this earth realm. Because no assumptions would be required and the proofs would be plentiful.
So yeah, none of your kajillion bytes of photographic data pass as proof. But since the globe earth is "settled science", there should be hundreds or thousands of other data points that irrefutably prove the establishment claim. Not just pictures and videos produced by government agencies that we can all agree don't have our best interests in mind.