14
NOT_ADMIN 14 points ago +15 / -1

I hope this is a lesson in disinformation for anyone who believed it without evidence, or perhaps misinformation for this who knew the movie was being made by others but then started believing Mel was more involved.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not proof. It's also very low quality images. Maybe find some hi-res images from the same angle, and do forensic facial wrinkle mapping, this is a forensic tool used to identify individuals after years of aging and even after surgeries.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • that's your opinion I have not seen any real evidence for that.
2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • He is the perfect example of a double-edged sword. Black hats and white-hats used him because he is a puppet.
  • black hats trust him because of his corruption while whitehats they could use that corruption to redpill
1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at 7:02. His phone matches the one in front of him to the left. Looks odd at first but it's likely just an exposure issue and his camera focal length is wider than the source footage camera.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

If true its is very interesting.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kinda, It depends more on the data given to it and the environment it learned in. For example when I created an Ai to detect people crossing the border, for the data i created 10000 temporal sequences which totals 30000 synthetic images of humans moving across terrain with random skin tones, clothing, walking paths, strides, speeds. But I only randomized the amount of people to be between 1 and 5. So the ai may fail with very large numbers, and it should fail with vehicles. It might also fail if there are any flashes of light from metallic objects or if the people are crawling. Basically, the more you randomize the data within realistic parameters, the more generalized the model and the more flexible the Ai will be to perform the task.

0
NOT_ADMIN 0 points ago +2 / -2
  • Ai is a tool. Designed to do a task. There are many Ai. Most are machine vision and are only designed to recognize what an object is, or estimate the volume of a liquid by sight etc.

  • any tool can be used as a weapon. And any tool can be crafted into a weapon.

  • ai isn't going away and it isn't enherently evil, just like a gun isn't. But it can be dangerous.

  • I suggest instead of fearing a tool we make our own.

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blackrock and vagaurd own them. They are the onse forcing companies to do this. Why? They want them to tank.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

however, it is an ideal solution for anyone who has a remote location, with access to power, but where traditional internet or WiFi services are unreliable or nonexistent. We have seen Starlink successfully working in rural locations with a low-density population that has limited, or no service from traditional fibre, cable, and DSL internet connections. An example of some other use cases where Starlink would be useful; onboard boats, oil rigs, remote mountain ranges, and other rural locations.

It appears to be design woth the idea of working when other services won't. It can work even where cell service stops like federal waters.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm.i will try searching around and get back to you

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

No you use a phased array antenna. You completely bypass ISPs as the traffic is beamed directly to you.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›