https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9IMx4Ct/the-old-lady-flu-shot/
People ARE waking up. Still a long way to go, but opinions are changing rapidly.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9IMxLOC/human-papilloma-virus-vaccine-hp/c/
The flu shot isn't the only one to avoid . . .
I think you are underestimating the ultimate effects of the Kill Shots and of the democidal depopulation campaign generally.
Soon, NO ONE will believe that ANYTHING put out by Pharma, or by any other large corporation or institution, is healthy for you, or positive in any way, or even slightly benign.
Within another few years, the landscape of trust will be VERY different, and Pharma as we know it will be just a bad memory.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I doubt it. The Great Awakening has barely begun, really, and the effects going forward will astonish us all.
There has NEVER been a good reason to take the flu shot, IMO. Keep your immune system up with vitamins C, D, and the B vitamins, take quercetin and/or green tea plus 35 - 50 mg zinc, and a few other things (there's a wide variety of proven-effective supplements available) and the chance of you getting sick drops substantially -- and if you DO get sick, you'll likely get over it much quicker than you would otherwise.
Having Trump, the most-listened to person currently ON EARTH, putting this out in plain language is AWESOME. The Woke will send it around, aghast. The rest of us (including many liberals and former semi-Woke) will spread the word with joy.
It's exactly what truly awake Americans (and others around the world) have been thinking and longing for, for years. Now the most effective and pro-America President we've ever had is stating it clearly.
AND we all know he'll actually follow through. There will be pushback, but Trump isn't just blowing smoke -- he'll get results.
What a time to be alive.
This IS partly by design, I believe (as WarMind says) but it is also -- even moreso -- the result of emotional damage, especially early in life. (Hence, horrors like the Inquisition and Salem Witch burnings, to name two particularly nasty examples).
The large Kaiser ACE study is an excellent overview of the problems that trauma in childhood can cause throughout later life:
ACE Study What is an ACE? An Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) is defined as experiencing any of the following categories of abuse, neglect, or loss prior to age 18:
- Physical abuse by a parent
- Emotional abuse by a parent
- Sexual abuse by anyone
- Growing up with an alcohol and/or drug abuser in the household
- Experiencing the incarceration of a household member
- Living with a family member experiencing mental illness
- Domestic violence
- Loss of a parent
- Emotional neglect
- Physical neglect
Beginning in 1994, the "adverse childhood experiences" (ACE) Study, a partnership between the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente assessed the relationship between adult health risk behaviors and childhood abuse and household dysfunction.
The study began with a sample of 9,508 individuals representing a 70.5% response rate. Respondents were given a score of one for each ACE category that they experienced.
Findings showed that people who experienced four or more adverse childhood events had:
- increased risk for smoking, alcoholism and drug abuse
- increased risk for depression and suicide attempts
- poor self-rated health
- 50 or more sexual partners
- greater likelihood of sexually transmitted disease
- challenges with physical inactivity, and severe obesity
A follow-up sample combined with baseline data for a total sample of 17,337. Additional findings show that ACE Score is associated with:
- likelihood of attempted suicide across the lifespan
- increased risk for broken bones
- heart disease
- lung disease
- liver disease
- multiple types of cancer
ACE Score is also correlated with:
- impaired job functioning
- homelessness
- criminal justice involvement
Not mentioned in the above: the symptoms caused in adulthood by childhood trauma had a strong, graded relation to the NUMBER of different traumas. And psychological symptoms of many types are absent or only hinted at in the data; "conflict" -- including between Christians -- is, I believe, a major result of all this early trauma.
Jesus knew what he was talking about when he told His flock to not "offend" children.
Language is an attempt to describe the fluid, ever-changing, unique, connected, ineffable nature of life and of reality generally by using static, delimited, common symbols (words). That it works even as poorly as it does is a miracle.
Interesting and insightful post, WarMind.
I've long thought that any religion's core teachings should fit on a 3 X 5 card, should be presented up-front at the beginning of its text, and be expanded after that with details consonant with the core teachings. Of course -- sigh -- it's too late for that.
The confusion caused by the "you can support any position with text from the Bible"^ factor is a major reason for division among Christians, in my experience. (^Yes, I understand that's an overstatement).
The expanded details of any religion naturally and beneficially include cultural differences, as long as they don't conflict with the most IMPORTANT of the core teachings, which is:
Any TRUE religion must obviously emphasize emotionally healthy behavior and attitudes. There are many ways to do this; Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Sikhism famously do so with Ahimsa, the doctrine of non-violence to all living things, which those religions and their adherents conform to in slightly different ways, especially as regards vegetarianism.
Jesus did this most famously with his admonitions about love, about proper treatment of children, and (IMO, but I'm probably an outlier here), in his statement about the location of the Kingdom of God / Heaven:
Matthew: 18:1 At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? 18:2 And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, 18:3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. 18:4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 18:5 And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Mark: 10:13: And they brought young children to him, that he should touch them: and his disciples rebuked those that brought them. 10:14: But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. 10:15: Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
Luke: 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
John: 13:34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. 13:35 By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
Clearly, any admonition to initiation of violence against others (human sacrifice, violent jihad against those who believe differently, etc) is at odds with the healthy ethos that defines a true religion.
There have always been people who escaped Communist countries telling us the same thing -- that Communism is a murderous, nightmare tyranny -- because EVERY Communist regime has been alike in that regard.
For example:
The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror Repression (written by a group of leftist European intellectuals who researched every Communist nation of the 20th Century; most were actually Marxists, and were all horrified by what they found.) -- very expensive book but worth having if the cost isn't an issue for you.
Death by Government: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900 5th PRINTING Edition by R.J. Rummel. -- Less expensive but still not cheap.
You can read some of the information in Rummel's book here, at his website. For example:
28,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
- 61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State
- 35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill
- 20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State
Note that it isn't just Communist nations that mass-murder "their own" people, but rather ANY nation that suffers under a real tyranny.
THIS IS WHAT WE ARE FIGHTING: a group that WILL kill its opponents and enslave those who are left. It doesn't matter what they call themselves.
In addition to those three supplements, I'd take (Hell, I DO take, despite not ever having COVID or being jabbed) a large number of OTHER supplements -- mostly based on natural plant or animal extracts -- that are known and validated (via clinical trials and other data) to improve health and in many cases to extend average lifespan in animals and in some cases (as expected, given the animal data) to extend HUMAN average lifespan as well.
NONE of these have ANY long-term validation for their effects in the jabbed or in those who have had serious episodes of COVID. How could they? There hasn't BEEN a long-term since this all started, and I don't know if any long-term trials on that cohort are even in the planning stages.
But the health-promoting benefits of supplements have been well-known and well-supported for decades. For instance, research scientists Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw published Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach in 1983, which became a best-seller. 858 pages.
Even well before that, Nobel-Prize winner Linus Pauling and many other doctors and scientists had published studies and other data showing remarkable benefits of supplemental vitamins and other substances (amino acids, herbs, antioxidants, etc). Obvious yet important caveat: everything, no exceptions, has its dangers -- including vitamins, herbs, etc. So does too much WATER for that matter; you can actually kill yourself by drinking too much H2O in a short period of time. Supplements are FAR safer than artificial drugs in nearly all cases, but -- don't be stupid.
I don't have 858 pages here, so I'll not start listing and describing particular supplements, but I encourage anyone concerned about their health to start researching the subject. IMO, taking just three supplements (as in McCullough's protocol) is weak sauce for dealing with the onslaught of poisons, pollution, GMOs, and other mostly-unavoidable assaults on our health, not to mention the spike protein and whatever else the Death Cult is attacking us with.
Yes. "Love thy neighbor" -- in whatever wording -- is really the heart of EVERY true religion. Love is the one-word distillation of everything that matters; protection of the young, ethical behavior in business and everywhere else; fidelity in marriage -- you name it.
True, and so does government.
NO society works properly with a mass of neurotic and sociopathic citizens. Religion can help, but as the Inquisition (among other things) shows, even religion can be corrupted, and people with heavy emotional damage cannot be reliably made to behave as if they were healthy. Neither laws nor religion can do that.
EDIT: Hence, Jesus teachings about compassionate treatment of children -- which is FAR more important than even most Christians seem to believe.
That government is best, which governs not at all.
Henry David Thoreau, in Civil Disobedience.
The FDA has been working to boost Rockefeller-style "medicine" and to surpress anything real, effective, and inexpensive since Day One.
Regulation is a critically important function that belongs in the PRIVATE SECTOR, not with government -- where it immediately becomes "control" and is taken over (regulatory capture) by those interested in removing your choice and pushing THEIR agenda for reasons of money and/or agenda.
Two examples below, both founded in the 1890s. They've since (esp. UL) become corrupted by government "partnership" but even now are examples of how civil society can provide regulation that is far more EFFECTIVE, far less COSTLY, and without the extreme tyranny that develops when government alone is the regulator.
Yes, and even aside from TRUST, there's the issue of COMPETENCE -- Trump clearly knows how to get things done, has the skills and brass balls needed to deal with foreign leaders, has learned who he can and cannot trust, has a record of consistently outing the no-longer "major" media for the liars they are, and so on.
I trust MYSELF to be true to the Constitution and MAGA values, but I know damn well I'd never be as effective in the White House as Trump has already shown himself to be. I don't have the personality for it, nor do many others. Trump, on the other hand, was clearly born for the role.
Yes! Forgot them, and they're apparently in contention for Numero Uno.