1
NoGardE 1 point ago +2 / -1

Remember to remind every legislator who votes for this of their vote in a few years when there's actually a chance of passing both chambers and getting signed into law.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

For Dr Natalia so loved the world that she gave her custom to a pharmaceutical megacorporation, that we might not perish of a mild cold, but should instead be enslaved to Klaus Schwab.

2
NoGardE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elections don't matter, only inaugurations. It doesn't matter whether Crippled Warmonger would properly have been recognized as the victor rather than Kenyan Commie. Kenyan Commie is the person who got to exercise the power.

5
NoGardE 5 points ago +5 / -0

Woodrow Wilson. Don't give this meat puppet so much credit.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's assuming Elon's control is an upgrade from their current position. The Twitter purchase has been good for us, and for a select few people who had been kicked off and have now been brought back, but it's too soon to say whether we're benefitting in the long term from Elon's purchase.

Merging the bird and SubStack would likely benefit Twitter, but I still don't trust Elon yet. He remains a technoglobalist, just a rival to the WEF set of technoglobalists.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

The crazy thing is, it's really a matter of the finder of fact being an issue, where most appeals rest on interpretation of the law. The judge just basically said, "Because you don't have someone confessing to their obvious malicious intent, it's not proven, so get fucked."

Since most appeals are used to accepting the decision of the finder of fact, it'll be hard to overturn. Maybe there's an appeal point on the judge finding fact rather than ordering a jury?

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Formally speaking, the US government claims secession isn't allowed. Therefore, they'd continue to claim authority over the troops stationed in the seceding states.

What really matters is whether the rank and file living in seceding states recognize the validity of the secession. If the substantial majority do, and the dissenting minority of troops are offered the choice between joining the seceding state's New military, leaving the service and entering civilian life, or moving to a different state, it would likely go peacefully.

If most of the military found the secession illegitimate, then a new union among the seceding states, forming a new military, would be necessary as a deterrent against invasion.

2
NoGardE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Add: suborned social media and advertising companies to advance propaganda in favor of the regime and silence opposition.

by BQnita
2
NoGardE 2 points ago +2 / -0

The words on pieces of paper only matter to the extent that people are willing to back it up with force. This code or that code, this or that statute, executive order, or memo, doesn't particularly matter.

The fundamental question is, what will convince the military and the executive departments to go along with a direction?

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, but this one is a Z, not an S, which makes it fine.

Please ignore that Kanye's was also a Z.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is true, but the Freedom Caucus can't prevent "Bipartisan" establishment stuff from getting rammed through.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be replaced with Kevin McCarthy as Speaker and some other lizard as Minority Leader.

The faces change, but the machine stays the same.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only thing that matters is whether the state apparatus will go along with a path. Seeing as they kept treating Obama as the real president all through the last 6 years, shuffling some paperwork won't do anything.

The closest thing there is to a viable plan is Trump winning in '24 beyond the margin of fortification, and then making the entire administrative state At-Will.

4
NoGardE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Get this man into the Senate. He's running in NH.

1
NoGardE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neither was Operation Warp Speed giving massive amounts of money to pharmaceutical corporations to bypass testing.

2
NoGardE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some of us have also done the experiments ourselves and validated that the models in the 1990's textbooks are accurate enough to rely on for day-to-day engineering.

18
NoGardE 18 points ago +18 / -0

Do you know your US Supreme Court history? Wickard v Filburn, they held that anything that impacts the economy counts is interstate commerce. Similarly, the WEF is about anything that impacts the economy.

Fun fact: just as "climate" is a term that encompasses all natural processes in the solar system, so it can be used as an excuse for anything, "economy" is a term that encompasses all human activity, so it can be used as an excuse for anything.

view more: ‹ Prev