It’s not actually just for medical use. In every interview I have seen, Rogan was the most memorable, Elon has stated, I’m paraphrasing here, that Neuralink will launch for medical purposes and about 5 years after that be available for non medical uses. Which he explains as high level computing in your head and high knowledge being able to connect to the internet and use it as a resource in your head. High capacity perfect recallable memory, etc. So high a level that if you don’t get one you will be left behind in society. He says it will expensive, $100K+, but after getting it you will be smart enough to easily work out paying it off afterwards for those who would have to finance it.
I believe the government “investigating or looking into Neuralink” is their controlled opposition of it. Oh we looked cause we don’t want nefarious tech and have to protect you cause we care but guess what it’s all good. Go get hooked up and make sure you upload the latest firmware into your head.
According to Elon Neuralink will be such an upgrade to human knowledge, computing power, and memory that those who don’t get it will be left behind and obsolete in society. See my post currently right above yours.
Too easy to hide a remote kill switch and start blackmailing people. The more we have to depend on others for basic things, the more opportunities for evil and evil people to sneak in. That's why I think private space travel or even colonies is a pipe dream because of human nature is way too fallen and volatile and there are way too many things that can go wrong (you won't cooperate, then no more oxygen for you).
While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.
Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.
As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later, appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.
This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."
I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but am wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they are not really in opposition, but are intended to create that illusion to change the beliefs of an otherwise wary populace. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful tools for changing our beliefs. It is one of the primary traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.
Very well said. I've observed this as well.This is why I am deeply suspicious of DeSantis. I also sometimes question Trump, especially about continuing to recommend the death shot.
All we really have is hope and continue to follow the real facts for truth. The research I've done for Trump has indicated that he is what we think he is. He definitely is human and makes mistakes.
If you have anything to add, would be curious to hear your thoughts about Trump and what you believe.
While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.
This is exactly the kind of thinking we always must entertain. It reminds me of how the so called robber barons and banking cartels in the 1910s publicly opposed the Federal Income Tax Law, and that swayed public opinion in FAVOR of the law because of how they were guided to believe it would hurt the big dogs who were barking the loudest. Well, as it has been documented in a couple of well researched books, that public opinion shift was the exact goal. The income tax law although appearing to harming the wealthy robber barons and banking cartels financially, actually benefited them... because it was not about the amount of money they had in their accounts, it was about controlling the flow of money in a society, which they could easily leverage to their own benefit in a virtual plutocracy. While of course establishing foundations and ensuring loopholes to skirt the downsides of the income tax law.
it has been documented in a couple of well researched books, that public opinion shift was the exact goal
Which books talk about this? If you approximately where I can find the references to how public opinion was swayed (chapter e.g.), that would be helpful too. Depending on the specific evidence they provide, this could be very useful for an upcoming part of my report.
I mean... If it was that easy, it wouldn't even be 2D chess. They're quite aware that we think like this: "MSM hates Elon, thus he is good". The easiest move to gain our trust is then to publicly attack the person while shaking hands with them in private.
Don't be so gullible and short-sighted, people! Nuclear power was "meant for good purposes" too but the potential of it being used as a weapon was quickly discovered. You think Neuralink will be any different?
There is already a procedure to stop handshakes...
They know from autopsies that Alzheimer patients have their pineal gland
coated or abnormal.
Prof Michael Levin and his work on cells show that each cell has consciousness and can function alone but works with the body....they can already regenerate spines in mice by a slight electrical charge and get the mice running about. Can grow teeth too. Thankfully will put expensive dentists out of business. When I mentioned this to my dentist he said they would t allow it..dentists wouldn't allow it.
..under Rockefeller control.
Either the whole thing is a scam..or something else is going on
Technology itself is a tool. Outcomes all depend on who uses the tool and how it is used.
Just because guns are used to kill people, it doesn't mean that guns are bad.
Even Elon Musk himself has concerns about how AI is going to be used. It is clear that he is not unaware of the dangers.
Technological advancements in any society shall be accompanied by strict moral teachings from God. Without that, technology itself will be used by evil to destroy us.
In thinking of the context of “you’re watching a movie” and the assumption that Elon is in fact a white hat.. the only way this storyline makes sense to me if that human/robot hybrids are to be shut down before it ever gets off the ground. Sort of the operation warspeed hypothesis. Elon purposely poisoned his reputation with msm prior to pushing this new goal of his. It’s the only thing that makes sense to me.
The road to destruction is paved with good intentions. They'll "investigate" to get his info, then use it for awful terrible things. Also, it's super creepy, never, ever.
It’s always about the long game. Look at how many things that are going on today that were seeds being planted decades ago. It’s starts off good then matures into it’s final disgusting form. Once enough people have it decades from now they have most of humanity by the balls and then we are done. And we will have championed our demise as well. Our Armageddon will happen sooner or later and it can’t be stopped but I don’t want to cheer on a satan worshiping brain chip maker in the mean time.
Not surprising. They're probably bored with going after Trump at the moment and Musk took a big dump in their Twitter-sandbox so he gets to be the object of this month's Two Minute Hate.
I wonder when they're going to launch investigations into Pfizer etc? Surely that's right around the corner!
I won't take it even if he is using it for benign and benevolent purpose. I don't trust such thing.
Its actually only for people who are paralyzed, have stroke etc.
And remember personal income tax will only apply to the rich. Those filthy rich folk. Not to you hard working middle and low class people.
This is how I feel. Slippery slope.
Aah. I see.
Do I dare say that you might be a potential customer for this? (I know, I should stop making jokes based on your name!)
Hahaha. I don't even care if you joke about my name, Bubble.
It’s not actually just for medical use. In every interview I have seen, Rogan was the most memorable, Elon has stated, I’m paraphrasing here, that Neuralink will launch for medical purposes and about 5 years after that be available for non medical uses. Which he explains as high level computing in your head and high knowledge being able to connect to the internet and use it as a resource in your head. High capacity perfect recallable memory, etc. So high a level that if you don’t get one you will be left behind in society. He says it will expensive, $100K+, but after getting it you will be smart enough to easily work out paying it off afterwards for those who would have to finance it.
I believe the government “investigating or looking into Neuralink” is their controlled opposition of it. Oh we looked cause we don’t want nefarious tech and have to protect you cause we care but guess what it’s all good. Go get hooked up and make sure you upload the latest firmware into your head.
I get you... however, a lot of people are missing the point...You don't have to get one, I won't... but that's not the point...
Same as the vaccines. Not getting one.
For those who want. I understand.
Unless you are paralyzed you won’t be a candidate for this procedure.
Unless you're old, obese, and diabetic, you won't be eligible for a "vaccine."
To start.
Jabbing someone with a needle is a lot quicker than scheduling brain surgery.
I understand. Then that's good then.
According to Elon Neuralink will be such an upgrade to human knowledge, computing power, and memory that those who don’t get it will be left behind and obsolete in society. See my post currently right above yours.
My brother would love one. His hands quake so much he can't do simple tasks.
I go for acupuncture.
Parkinson?
His doctors say MS, but I take it with a grain of salt. It took them 2 years to diagnose it.
Look into Vitamin A poisoning. It's real.
https://ggenereux.blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/extinguishing-the-fires-of-hell2.pdf
Too easy to hide a remote kill switch and start blackmailing people. The more we have to depend on others for basic things, the more opportunities for evil and evil people to sneak in. That's why I think private space travel or even colonies is a pipe dream because of human nature is way too fallen and volatile and there are way too many things that can go wrong (you won't cooperate, then no more oxygen for you).
That's what I was thinking too.
Name checks out.
Thanks.
Didn't planet of the apes kinda start that w.. Nevermind
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1599903522275102720
Trying to put him in the Fauci boat...
While doing my investigation I found that in every instance when an agenda, idea, controversial thing was pushed on the populace, it was done by controlling the opposition; by being the opposition. The idea that "they" wouldn't want X since they are trying to shut down X is not merited in the evidence.
Take for example Birth Control (since I'm currently working on that). According to the official history, Margaret Sanger was arrested and harassed, mostly by the NY Police department. This harassment, her arrests and eventual jail in the NY police corrections are stated as having been the best thing for her movement (according to official history). This last action in particular (imprisonment) brought huge attention to her movement and caused great sympathy for "the underdog," poor Ms. Margaret Sanger, who was just trying to help people and increase women's freedom.
As it turns out, the person who was in charge of the Jail system in NY at the time Sanger was arrested was, just a couple years later, appointed head of the Bureau of Social Hygiene by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This is the stated funding source for Sanger that eventually kicked off her superstardom. While I can't find direct evidence for it, the NY Police department was almost certainly under Rockefeller control at the time as well. It was well known as corrupt. Since I have shown that Rockefeller owned the entirety of New York at the time, his rulership of the Police is almost certain.
This is just one connection between Sanger and Rockefeller that suggests they were in opposition, when in fact they were besties. The Sanger-Rockefeller relationship is just one example of such "Opposition."
I'm not speaking on the Musk thing or his Neurolink. Personally I'm a fan of both, but am wary about everything. My suggestion is never to assume that just because entities appear to be in opposition, that they actually are. Most of the time (almost all of the time), according to my investigation, they are not really in opposition, but are intended to create that illusion to change the beliefs of an otherwise wary populace. Controlled Opposition is one of the most useful tools for changing our beliefs. It is one of the primary traps of The Matrix (and every con game). Be on the lookout for it at all times in your investigations.
Very well said. I've observed this as well.This is why I am deeply suspicious of DeSantis. I also sometimes question Trump, especially about continuing to recommend the death shot.
All we really have is hope and continue to follow the real facts for truth. The research I've done for Trump has indicated that he is what we think he is. He definitely is human and makes mistakes.
If you have anything to add, would be curious to hear your thoughts about Trump and what you believe.
This is exactly the kind of thinking we always must entertain. It reminds me of how the so called robber barons and banking cartels in the 1910s publicly opposed the Federal Income Tax Law, and that swayed public opinion in FAVOR of the law because of how they were guided to believe it would hurt the big dogs who were barking the loudest. Well, as it has been documented in a couple of well researched books, that public opinion shift was the exact goal. The income tax law although appearing to harming the wealthy robber barons and banking cartels financially, actually benefited them... because it was not about the amount of money they had in their accounts, it was about controlling the flow of money in a society, which they could easily leverage to their own benefit in a virtual plutocracy. While of course establishing foundations and ensuring loopholes to skirt the downsides of the income tax law.
Which books talk about this? If you approximately where I can find the references to how public opinion was swayed (chapter e.g.), that would be helpful too. Depending on the specific evidence they provide, this could be very useful for an upcoming part of my report.
I'm reminded of the proverb:. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions ." Original source unknown.
I mean... If it was that easy, it wouldn't even be 2D chess. They're quite aware that we think like this: "MSM hates Elon, thus he is good". The easiest move to gain our trust is then to publicly attack the person while shaking hands with them in private. Don't be so gullible and short-sighted, people! Nuclear power was "meant for good purposes" too but the potential of it being used as a weapon was quickly discovered. You think Neuralink will be any different?
I've been a little suspicious that this is pre-existing technology that they keep for themselves.
Yep, this is becoming painfully obvious
It doesn’t help musk that he has them all soiling themselves…he’s likely going to always be getting investigated for something
We are from the government...
What about the cures. This harassment is about the free speech on twatter.
There is already a procedure to stop handshakes...
They know from autopsies that Alzheimer patients have their pineal gland coated or abnormal.
Prof Michael Levin and his work on cells show that each cell has consciousness and can function alone but works with the body....they can already regenerate spines in mice by a slight electrical charge and get the mice running about. Can grow teeth too. Thankfully will put expensive dentists out of business. When I mentioned this to my dentist he said they would t allow it..dentists wouldn't allow it.
..under Rockefeller control.
Either the whole thing is a scam..or something else is going on
Diet also likely has something to do with it.
Yes I agree
MAYBE. How anyone here would put blind faith in new, untested tech with big altruistic promises is literally beyond me.
I hope it's being done for good purposes. Just think of all the disabled veterans that could benefit...
Unless its more theatre.
Those who love violence weaponize everything. The bulwark we are missing is institutional transparency
Technology itself is a tool. Outcomes all depend on who uses the tool and how it is used.
Just because guns are used to kill people, it doesn't mean that guns are bad.
Even Elon Musk himself has concerns about how AI is going to be used. It is clear that he is not unaware of the dangers.
Technological advancements in any society shall be accompanied by strict moral teachings from God. Without that, technology itself will be used by evil to destroy us.
They want to steal the technology.
In thinking of the context of “you’re watching a movie” and the assumption that Elon is in fact a white hat.. the only way this storyline makes sense to me if that human/robot hybrids are to be shut down before it ever gets off the ground. Sort of the operation warspeed hypothesis. Elon purposely poisoned his reputation with msm prior to pushing this new goal of his. It’s the only thing that makes sense to me.
The road to destruction is paved with good intentions. They'll "investigate" to get his info, then use it for awful terrible things. Also, it's super creepy, never, ever.
It’s always about the long game. Look at how many things that are going on today that were seeds being planted decades ago. It’s starts off good then matures into it’s final disgusting form. Once enough people have it decades from now they have most of humanity by the balls and then we are done. And we will have championed our demise as well. Our Armageddon will happen sooner or later and it can’t be stopped but I don’t want to cheer on a satan worshiping brain chip maker in the mean time.
A brave new world.
Not surprising. They're probably bored with going after Trump at the moment and Musk took a big dump in their Twitter-sandbox so he gets to be the object of this month's Two Minute Hate.
I wonder when they're going to launch investigations into Pfizer etc? Surely that's right around the corner!
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXCjyArB/x/c/4TogeUApzOc