So that's a pagan for you.
Christ: No one is good, not one. (Mark 10:18) >> This is why we need Christ! <<
Ghandi: If people were good enough to not need Jesus, we'd follow Jesus.
Saying "the Catholic church" in this context vs. actual US Catholics is like saying "America opened its borders" in OBiden's reign vs. what actual Americans wanted.
In fact "Are we beginning to see" is apparently yes. As one data point: https://amgreatness.com/2025/04/23/catholics-turn-on-the-democrats/
If your point is that .gov people are often useless or at least careless you’ve made it. From over here in private work it’s a security breach waiting to happen, a quick ride to the do-not-promote list, and a faster ride out if the lapse leads to a phish or other incident.
BS. Every employer drills it into employees’ heads not to use work email for social purposes.
The only reason to use the .gov is because it’s for work purposes.
Well. Middle-class people rarely have the $ to become pilots, much less have means to own and operate a plane.
I’d cross-correlate with the jab. Doesn’t take much inattention to auger, just a bit of heart trouble or a brief blackout.
“Our democracy “ at work.
Sadly for EUrocrats this probably either ends for them under a scimitar or a guillotine.
You perhaps misspelled “world” but “West” is a part of the world…
The Jesuits have been sneaky underhanded schemers longer than there's been a USA. One can only tangentially call them Catholic at all.
Relevant to this board, consider the kind of people Jesuits persecuted back around the time this country was founded. That's some fun noodle baking and will get you labeled as far wierder than a mere Q enthusiast.
No. We preserve our milkweed and get an excellent response from butterflies.
Took em a year to realize that the resource was going to be reliable.
BuT iF we L3t mIgRaNtS in teh ArMy tHeY wIll b3 m0d3l Americans
So many thin covers for overseas election fraud.
I can easily imagine the wave of populist wins around the world without these funds to prop up globalist politicians.
Just like bad newbie 1LTs; by the book they’re trained to be confident and decisive which gets people killed until they have experience or unless they have enough brains to trust their sergeants and team.
Conversely the hardest thing to do in leadership is get that honest answer until trust is built; by default people give the answer that makes the boss go away, what they think boss wants to hear, or what they think will get the desired result.
Again, here Trump has built that over a lifetime, not least by getting shot!
So: these rely on the general assumption about Nixon insofar as he never got charged -- and so the blanket was never put to a test.
There's one way to find out if a blanket pardon for an unspecified, not yet charged crime is valid.
As with so many other matters, you only want to put something important like this to the test when you're sure of the result. We don't want to accidentally lock into place a mechanism where evil can do whatever it wants to us and then pardon itself, laughing over the wreckage with impunity.
OANN here through KloudTV.
Excellent. He committed many many crimes over his career. Maybe the LGBT crew would have a word or two.
There are a nontrivial number of auto door amateur ballistics tests out there.
Don’t count on some sheet metal as cover even while some dingo is measuring his block of clear gel.
c.f. "Liberator" pistol.
Recognise the pattern; just like the left moved into journalism so as to bleat out that the country wanted socialism, or had Tweets by the thousands all duckspeaking about the clot shot at once, so here.
Many large institutions have leftists embedded in places where they can exercise undue volume.
On the ground, correct traditional thought surges, to the point where it worries Francis.
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2022/06/14/pope-francis-traditionalist-gag-243151
It has always been thus. The elites create language to disparage the people.
“Vulgar” from the Latin for the regular people. “Villain” from Anglo-French (like after the Normans invaded) from Medieval Latin and back to Latin for a country person.
All our language is tuned by people who hate most people and want to rule unjustly.
The second most dangerous data security risk is a disgruntled employee.
The most dangerous risk is an embattled C-suite exec, because then it’s a business transaction and not a crime.
I think the lack of competence was proven by the event.
Yes, long before any Q stuff. I easily remember uses from a decade ago and in all likelihood the name dates from 17 :) seconds after they landed on the NSA name itself. Might even be the reason NSA was named that if anyone involved had our sense of humor.
Observer: [discussing The Village] This place has been going for a long time.
Number 6: Since the war? Before the war? WHICH... WAR?
(this from 1967)
The awake have known all along what's up.
SHE/IT. Yep. (insert the usual meme with the usual face stretching that word out)