12
OneMoreTim3 12 points ago +12 / -0

I wonder if that picture was the 1776 equivalent of the hot girls holding AR-15s today.

3
OneMoreTim3 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am familiar already. I just trust Derek more.

Dereks view matches very closely with my own observations and beliefs. He was the first to explain what I was seeing with the laws to back it up with the how and why.

1
OneMoreTim3 1 point ago +2 / -1

Talking out if his ass by giving verifiable facts?

Did "Biden" reauthorize those EOs? Yup. That's a FACT. Verifable if youbarent to lazy or have your head buried.

What do you think he was making up?

0
OneMoreTim3 0 points ago +2 / -2

What presumptions? He names the actual laws so you can look them up yourself. He links them even.

He is the least presumptive person I follow.

3
OneMoreTim3 3 points ago +3 / -0

This was an early one for me as well but I still don't get the whole post master general part.

1
OneMoreTim3 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is pretty big. Wonder why not higher.

18
OneMoreTim3 18 points ago +18 / -0

You eagle eyed pede genius!

2
OneMoreTim3 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem with these statements is the lack of explanation.

What are we supposed to do? Expose them how? Pointing fingers and crying pedophile on suspicions?

We don't have the verified knowledge of even who we are exposing other than Hollywood, zionists, jesuits, masons, etc all of which are pretty damn generic terms that have some decent people in them.

If we are the digital soldiers quit withholding the ammo! So we can work!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›