Then I encourage getting to "know" Patel Patriot. He was the original person, in early 2021, to begin researching Devolution and how it might apply to actions taken by President Trump.
Patel Patriots meticulously researched articles and increasingly frequent appearances on alt media shows like X22 to discuss his research became known as the Devolution Theory.
Patel Patriot says that there is NO WAY to know whether President Trump is still CIC. Those who say that he is are GUESSING. They are not stating a proven FACT.
Could the guess turn out to be correct? Yes. But right now, its just a guess and, as Q warned, the guesser should make that clear.
Is it possible that we'll never know? Patel Patriot and many of those who have read his 33+ Devolution Research articles agree, its very unlikely that the public will ever know. But its possible.
Dereks view matches very closely with my own observations and beliefs. He was the first to explain what I was seeing with the laws to back it up with the how and why.
Son. You seem to have somehow accidentally wandered onto the playing field with your hot dog and Bud light. Clearly your attitude seems to be that everything you've never read is bs. That's not how it works around here.
did u really ban him for a week? LUL, but - and its happened to me from drunk posting, but i gotta say i think the ability to even have this conversation is more important than not letting someone voice their opinion? seems like hes truly trying to figure this out.
Hes banned for a week for expressing his perspective and not liking the video. The message is clear and purposeful. Get in line, say the things, like the things, carry the water and do not ask questions or have any identity outside of the proscribed lines. You are utterly expendable and have no value to the "community", in the traditional or normal meaning of that word.
Without looking at the particular EO's, I'll just say that just because Trump likes steak for dinner, does not preclude Biden also enjoying it. Meaning that sometimes they overlap. Much of what he thinks is weird about Biden extending EO's is based on the presumption that absolute diametrical opposition is obviously employed in all and every instance. That is a matter of faith still. You have to already have made the leap. If one researched to find the answer to this question of weird EO extending they may find explanations that don't reflect "The Plan".
So what explanation is there? A candidate runs on the idea that they're the antithesis of their predecessor and then immediately upon taking office they start verbatim renewing EOs of their predecessor?
Walk me through an alternative explanation, because even in my most charitable mindset I can't think of one!
Most executive orders don't have an expiration date. So Trump kept many Obama executive orders in place. I just made a comment where Trump used Obama EOs to extend sanctions on North Korea and Venezuela.
EO 13818:
Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
They don't know that this did not originate with Trump and Trump had to pass this.
Why did Trump have to pass this? Because he was obligated to execute a law passed by Congress and signed by Obama. Which law? The EO says this right up front. The authority Trump relied on for this law was the
the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act
which was passed as part of this law (Public Law 114-328) which was signed by Obama in December 2016. It's the big Military budget law where smaller acts like the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act are debated in Congress and added to the bill when they get approved.
Subtitle F—Human Rights Sanctions
SEC. 1261. SHORT TITLE.
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act
This law defines a new sanctions regime Congress is telling the President to carry out. In this law the president "shall" (this means must in legalese) review a list sent by congress of people to be sanctioned, review if they have committed the offense and report back to congress if the person is being sanctioned or not and what the sanction is. The president must also do this
(h) Regulatory Authority.—The President shall issue such regulations, licenses, and orders as are necessary to carry out this section.
There's other thing the President must do including the dates and times of the report.
The Trump Administrations actually missed the date for the first report. The same day the Executive Order 13818 went into effect, the Treasury Department delivered the report to Congress on who was sanctioned.
United States Sanctions Human Rights Abusers and Corrupt Actors Across the Globe
December 21, 2017
New Executive Order Implements Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act,
Provides for Treasury Sanctions Against Malign Actors Worldwide
...
In an Annex to the Order, the President imposed sanctions on 13 serious human rights abusers and corrupt actors. In addition, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, imposed sanctions on an additional 39 affiliated individuals and entities under the newly-issued Order.
A better example might be the Patriot Act. It's safe to say no one here supported or supports that giant infringement on our rights, yet 45 did not reverse it. It is presumed to be one of those "using your enemy's own weapons against them" scenarios no?
Most executive orders are not about policy disagreements
Lots of them are don't even originate with the President, but they are a way of the President following a law passed by Congress
Which is to say the an executive order is the executive branch executing a law.
An EO becomes the published rules for the law and gets published in the Federal Register.
There's plenty of examples of executive orders agreeing with previous policy and extending it. For example Trump extended sanctions against North Korea and Venezuela in his first year, these built on executive orders levying sanctions.
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in order to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13692 of March 8, 2015,
One pol can be the "antithesis" of another, but still overlap on tons of things. That can be an explanation. I don't know that it is. Just keeping an open and honest mind and trying to think about it without any religiosity.
He is repeating parts of the "solid theories" developed and popularized by someone else and sharing some of that persons foundational research.
Hopefully this video will inspire people to go to the original source who does NOT conflate guesses with facts.
This is a topic that's faaar too complex to be understood and vetted via a video lecture. That's why the originator researcher and populizer of the Devolution Theory uses articles with links to his many primary sources.
Guesses based on some facts are still guesses. As Q warned, these guesses should be clearly identified as guesses in order to avoid confusion and to avoid providing our adversaries with smear fodder.
Hopefully Qs warnings will be heeded so the consequences Q warned of are avoided.
Personally, I don't call Derek and his fans trolls since I'm not a mind reader so I can't know what their motivations are.
Instead, for DJ fans who are sincerely curious about the Devolution Theory I prefer encouraging them to go to the original source and read Patel Patriots detailed and meticulously sourced 33 articles that lays out what's now known as the Devolution Theory.
I'm puzzled why Derek isn't doing this too. Hopefully he will start doing so asap.
Seems some people want to shut what Derek says down just because, well, they say he provides no proof. That's bullshit. He's close to something here and that scares the hell out of the demons. If you don't agree, move on, no one cares if you think it's bs.
It’s a fact that Biden didn’t get a 13 gun salute, he didn’t have Hail to the Chief played at the fake inauguration, and he didn’t get the touch the wreath of the fallen soldier. All things that the POTUS gets.
I wouldnt say its comms, moreso soft disclosure. Have you gotten to the episode that teases plausible deniability? Where the alien with amnesia directs a tv show depicting dramatized events of SG:1
He clearly stated that the Constitution is suspended when the COG (COOP) started post insurrection.
COG did not start. He has zero evidence of this. We have plenty of evidence otherwise. Example, normal civilian government and courts continue in every single city and town in this country.
He doesn't have evidence but the originator of what's now known as The Devolution Theory does have evidence which he links.
However, the originator, Patel Patriot, is very scholarly and cautious so he makes it very clear when he is stating a FACT and when he's speculating. I'm grateful for his self discipline.
When I encounter "influencers" who are less disciplined; people who conflate guessing with stating proven, vettable facts, I'm reminded of Qs many warnings, especially when Q became more "mainstream" and began attracting the interest of people who lacked the training found on the chans.
No one especially Biden would sign orders that hurt him......He signed orders on stuff he doesn't believe in.
Or it could be your assumptions are wrong.
What about those executive orders would hurt him?
Added
As for researching what he says. US Law (and orders) derive from the Constitution. The language of Constitution is quite clear
The Constitution provides: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the
Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States . . . .” U.S. Const. art. I, § 2,cl. 1.
This makes Biden as president the Commander in Chief.
I would like to have a beer with that man
Several 😉
He backs up what he says with verifiable facts, not opinions.
I wish it didn't hinge on a presumption
What presumptions? He names the actual laws so you can look them up yourself. He links them even.
He is the least presumptive person I follow.
Then I encourage getting to "know" Patel Patriot. He was the original person, in early 2021, to begin researching Devolution and how it might apply to actions taken by President Trump.
Patel Patriots meticulously researched articles and increasingly frequent appearances on alt media shows like X22 to discuss his research became known as the Devolution Theory.
Patel Patriot says that there is NO WAY to know whether President Trump is still CIC. Those who say that he is are GUESSING. They are not stating a proven FACT.
Could the guess turn out to be correct? Yes. But right now, its just a guess and, as Q warned, the guesser should make that clear.
Is it possible that we'll never know? Patel Patriot and many of those who have read his 33+ Devolution Research articles agree, its very unlikely that the public will ever know. But its possible.
I am familiar already. I just trust Derek more.
Dereks view matches very closely with my own observations and beliefs. He was the first to explain what I was seeing with the laws to back it up with the how and why.
Not facts he talking out his ass sorry none of his other videos were true like his posting from the new GITMO
Son. You seem to have somehow accidentally wandered onto the playing field with your hot dog and Bud light. Clearly your attitude seems to be that everything you've never read is bs. That's not how it works around here.
Here, take a week off to get caught up.
https://www.devolution.link
There will be a quiz...
did u really ban him for a week? LUL, but - and its happened to me from drunk posting, but i gotta say i think the ability to even have this conversation is more important than not letting someone voice their opinion? seems like hes truly trying to figure this out.
Hes banned for a week for expressing his perspective and not liking the video. The message is clear and purposeful. Get in line, say the things, like the things, carry the water and do not ask questions or have any identity outside of the proscribed lines. You are utterly expendable and have no value to the "community", in the traditional or normal meaning of that word.
WWG1WGA
Yeah. Unban the guy. We don’t benefit from being in an echo chamber. We are better than this.
Smashing with facts way better than banhammer.
Truth is a lion. Let the fool's foolishness stand exposed. Are we for free speech or not? This is queer.
The EO's are real but that doesn't mean all of Johnson's conclusions are necessarily correct.
Without looking at the particular EO's, I'll just say that just because Trump likes steak for dinner, does not preclude Biden also enjoying it. Meaning that sometimes they overlap. Much of what he thinks is weird about Biden extending EO's is based on the presumption that absolute diametrical opposition is obviously employed in all and every instance. That is a matter of faith still. You have to already have made the leap. If one researched to find the answer to this question of weird EO extending they may find explanations that don't reflect "The Plan".
So what explanation is there? A candidate runs on the idea that they're the antithesis of their predecessor and then immediately upon taking office they start verbatim renewing EOs of their predecessor?
Walk me through an alternative explanation, because even in my most charitable mindset I can't think of one!
The same way Trump didn’t remove every policy made under Obama. It’s not hard to conceive Biden doing the same with some of Trumps policies.
So you can link up an Obama executive order that Trump renewed verbatim?
Most executive orders don't have an expiration date. So Trump kept many Obama executive orders in place. I just made a comment where Trump used Obama EOs to extend sanctions on North Korea and Venezuela.
A lot of people have referenced this Trump executive order https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27925/blocking-the-property-of-persons-involved-in-serious-human-rights-abuse-or-corruption
EO 13818: Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
They don't know that this did not originate with Trump and Trump had to pass this.
Why did Trump have to pass this? Because he was obligated to execute a law passed by Congress and signed by Obama. Which law? The EO says this right up front. The authority Trump relied on for this law was the
which was passed as part of this law (Public Law 114-328) which was signed by Obama in December 2016. It's the big Military budget law where smaller acts like the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act are debated in Congress and added to the bill when they get approved.
In that law look at section1261
This law defines a new sanctions regime Congress is telling the President to carry out. In this law the president "shall" (this means must in legalese) review a list sent by congress of people to be sanctioned, review if they have committed the offense and report back to congress if the person is being sanctioned or not and what the sanction is. The president must also do this
There's other thing the President must do including the dates and times of the report.
The Trump Administrations actually missed the date for the first report. The same day the Executive Order 13818 went into effect, the Treasury Department delivered the report to Congress on who was sanctioned.
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0243
...
It doesn’t have to be executive order, but policies made in Obama-era like CARRP, is something Trump kept and supports.
A better example might be the Patriot Act. It's safe to say no one here supported or supports that giant infringement on our rights, yet 45 did not reverse it. It is presumed to be one of those "using your enemy's own weapons against them" scenarios no?
Most executive orders are commonplace.
Most executive orders are not about policy disagreements
Lots of them are don't even originate with the President, but they are a way of the President following a law passed by Congress
Which is to say the an executive order is the executive branch executing a law.
An EO becomes the published rules for the law and gets published in the Federal Register.
There's plenty of examples of executive orders agreeing with previous policy and extending it. For example Trump extended sanctions against North Korea and Venezuela in his first year, these built on executive orders levying sanctions.
This Trump EO, built on a 2015 Obama EO https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/08/29/2017-18468/imposing-additional-sanctions-with-respect-to-the-situation-in-venezuela
This Trump EO builds on a 2008 Bush EO and references 3 under Obama https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/09/25/2017-20647/imposing-additional-sanctions-with-respect-to-north-korea
One pol can be the "antithesis" of another, but still overlap on tons of things. That can be an explanation. I don't know that it is. Just keeping an open and honest mind and trying to think about it without any religiosity.
He would never continue an EO on election fraud that hurts the DEMONrats.
Unless he believes it won't hurt dems. Or that it may hurt but be worth it? I don't know, of course. Just a possibility
Three orders make no sense to renew.
Did you even listen?
He is repeating parts of the "solid theories" developed and popularized by someone else and sharing some of that persons foundational research.
Hopefully this video will inspire people to go to the original source who does NOT conflate guesses with facts.
This is a topic that's faaar too complex to be understood and vetted via a video lecture. That's why the originator researcher and populizer of the Devolution Theory uses articles with links to his many primary sources.
Talking out if his ass by giving verifiable facts?
Did "Biden" reauthorize those EOs? Yup. That's a FACT. Verifable if youbarent to lazy or have your head buried.
What do you think he was making up?
Guesses based on some facts are still guesses. As Q warned, these guesses should be clearly identified as guesses in order to avoid confusion and to avoid providing our adversaries with smear fodder.
Hopefully Qs warnings will be heeded so the consequences Q warned of are avoided.
Hopefully, DJ will become more mindful asap.
It's all guesses on those of us out of the know...
Trolls are coming out of the woodwork.
Personally, I don't call Derek and his fans trolls since I'm not a mind reader so I can't know what their motivations are.
Instead, for DJ fans who are sincerely curious about the Devolution Theory I prefer encouraging them to go to the original source and read Patel Patriots detailed and meticulously sourced 33 articles that lays out what's now known as the Devolution Theory.
I'm puzzled why Derek isn't doing this too. Hopefully he will start doing so asap.
I am no mind reader. You can tell the trolls if you see when they joined and previous comments.
Lately they have been coming here like crazy.
He was on X22 last Saturday. This man knows how it works.
wonderful video!!!
Seems some people want to shut what Derek says down just because, well, they say he provides no proof. That's bullshit. He's close to something here and that scares the hell out of the demons. If you don't agree, move on, no one cares if you think it's bs.
It’s a fact that Biden didn’t get a 13 gun salute, he didn’t have Hail to the Chief played at the fake inauguration, and he didn’t get the touch the wreath of the fallen soldier. All things that the POTUS gets.
THIS
The shills are just trying to keep normies from doing the research and being red pilled
Cheyenne Mtn. vs. [ SES ] / [DS ]
Biden is a goa'uld host
Col. Jack O'Neil being played by Trump
Basically, yeah.
MJ 12 says Stargate is comms.😃
I only watched season 1
I wouldnt say its comms, moreso soft disclosure. Have you gotten to the episode that teases plausible deniability? Where the alien with amnesia directs a tv show depicting dramatized events of SG:1
Ha? I was gonna say soft disclosure but changed it to comms😃😃
Haven't seen the alien w amnesia episode yet !
Hopium of the highest order. Thanks!
Fact: No hopium needed
I know folks here are fans of this guy. But when he talks about Laws and Orders he seems to ignore the Constitution which undermines what he says.
He clearly stated that the Constitution is suspended when the COG (COOP) started post insurrection. Did you listen to the video?
BTW, I'm not defending or even agreeing with him, just stating what he said re: your question.
He clearly stated that the Constitution is suspended when the COG (COOP) started post insurrection.
COG did not start. He has zero evidence of this. We have plenty of evidence otherwise. Example, normal civilian government and courts continue in every single city and town in this country.
I TOLD YOU... Im not advocating or supporting what he's saying, But cant control yourself apparently. FFS.
He doesn't have evidence but the originator of what's now known as The Devolution Theory does have evidence which he links.
However, the originator, Patel Patriot, is very scholarly and cautious so he makes it very clear when he is stating a FACT and when he's speculating. I'm grateful for his self discipline.
When I encounter "influencers" who are less disciplined; people who conflate guessing with stating proven, vettable facts, I'm reminded of Qs many warnings, especially when Q became more "mainstream" and began attracting the interest of people who lacked the training found on the chans.
Why are you trolls here?
Before claiming I'm a troll, how about you engage with the what I said. Point to a single thing I have posted that is incorrect. Educate me.
No one especially Biden would sign orders that hurt him. He signed one against China. He signed one on election fraud and treason.
He signed orders on stuff he doesn't believe in.
Go listen this time.
Or it could be your assumptions are wrong.
What about those executive orders would hurt him?
Added
As for researching what he says. US Law (and orders) derive from the Constitution. The language of Constitution is quite clear
This makes Biden as president the Commander in Chief.
For anyone who needs more evidence ever since Watergate, the DOJ has had a policy of not indicting sitting president.
I get the appeal of hopium and copium, but it doesn't mean I should snort fat rails of these drugs.
Biden, is not the President of the republic. He is the president, of a bankrupt corporation. Therefore, he is not the CIC.
So you tell me.
A bankrupt corporation that started in the 1800's right?
Doesn't that mean Trump was also president of that corporation?
It all seems like snorting lines of copium
Look. If you believe that Joey Bribes won the 2020 election? And he is the legitimate POTUS, and CIC. You're commenting on the wrong site.
What did you do your own damn research.
Listen to what he says go look up the orders and then get back to me otherwise leave me alone troll.
Do not answer me.
All you negative people posting did you truly listen?
Did people read the 33+ research articles that Patel Patriot began writing in early 2021; research that became known as the Devolution Theory?
If not, I highly recommend that they do.
Hopefully helpful feedback:
Hes explaining how President Trump COULD BE "Commander-In-Chief". There is NO WAY to know whether he is or he isnt. We may never know.
Guessing can be entertaining and can help keep ones mind in tippy top shape.
However, conflating guesses with proven facts, especially if the guesses are based on facts, is something Q warned against.
Who's Derek Johnson again? NASCAR driver correct?
https://www.derekjohnsoncountry.com/bio
Where’s the video of trumps presser talking about this?