Whattsamatta? You ain't bloodthirsty?
Maybe that's what all the people that signal as satanists are doing! Oh, and maybe all of the "good" guys are actually the bad guys. And the same for the "bad guys". Maybe they've ALL read The Art Of War since it's not exactly obscure, having been on every high school and/or college reading list ever and not to mention a popular coffee table book for That Guys all over the country. Hmmm. What if I'm assigning dudes and labels based on my own personal preferences? Aww geez. I'm fucked.
Actual discernment in action. Not giving in to peer pressure, and not caving to confirmation bias outright, as well optimism bias and self-serving, availability, and anchoring, being other types of biases you managed to discern yourself free of. At least that's the goal of critical thinking. The effort is what is important. Sustained until habitual. Forgive the tangent, but it sticks out like a sore thumb when I see because it's so rare these days, as we all know. And most rightly identify it as a major problem to be overcome. But that's it usually. When it comes to actual practice most people won't be separated from the dainty little narrative that they already have going. Again, sorry for the tangent when I should have left it at just saying, "Good on you, and I agree with your reasoning. Well done".
Alot of people that want to make America great again have no interest in being in a club or anything that sells merch. To them, America was great when you didn't have to perform politics to your neighbors. And you didn't care what their political persuasion was as long as they voted. And were left alone. So there's a lot of overlap with the protest sorts that do like merch and "belonging" to a group that has insider lingo. America when it was great, allowed for such things. Pressure to confirm makes it feel culty.
I think he was just saying that he's not associated with the Trump led in particular part of the republican base. I'd guess you know this already and are being obtuse just because, why not? Which of course, why not? But Incase you don't know and genuinely think he was saying he doesn't want to make America great again, I believe he is very obviously not saying that and didn't imagine such a misreading of his comments.
The part about Tucker not wanting his lucrative brand and work to be interrupted. This is a part of the calculus for determining people's motivation that I always see people applying pretty loosey goosey. It's a huge part of any person's psychology. Money, and maintenance of their off camera, out of D.C. lives is what I believe is the major driver for most of the people we talk about. Then there's people that will instead of weighting those everyday mundane realities of life in 2023 properly, will insert massive narratives of good/evil with a equally massive backstory and extended universe of characters. And if that sounds cinematic or made for t.v.(web), well that's because it is. But that's none of my business.
He answers to "Shaman". And doesn't appear to be neurotypical in his presentation. C'mon, he's got a big ol heart and deserves all the love he can get in this world, but he's a total kook and there's nothing wrong with that.
Haha. Good one!
Sparse crowd, huh?
I'm OQ. Looks like it's just you and me. Lol
Phooker talk.
.. too, while we're at it.
Ok. That's not what I was initially referring to.
I think the average is 70-75.
Separation of church and state.
I remember a year or two ago when someone that had anything to do with D.C. would die after a long long life at like, 82 or something, and everyone would claim it was Donald Trump and The White Hats evening the score. Haha. Natural causes my ass! 82 year olds don't just die. Everyone knows that
Same reason not everyone dies in every car wreck that involves a fatality. Obviously.
He's dressed in Belenciaga
He sure wants our money
Youd make terrible movies.
You are correct sir. And it's working. Yuck
Don't be so afraid. You're fine to love and be loved. Don't be so available for control.
I agree on contrarianism not being discernment. Which is something I see an absolute TON of here at GAW. But I don't think he was being contrary in place of being thoughtful. But what I do see a ton of is people stumbling on those hurdles that he was at least trying to avoid. I believe most of the work done in the GA is from just the trying. If people are aware of the fallacies and at least trying to avoid traps on their way to the truth, especially when it would be easier to let biases dictate out "truth". Obviously it would be massively hypocritical of us here to do that. So I champion any warriors that go forth with unpopular but warranted revelations. I don't care for false booms or participation trophies. Same is true for you I presume.