Child 1 steals cookies from cookie jar
Parents " did one of you steal cookies"
Child 1 : silent
Child 2 : "I don't know"
Parents "Tell us now"
Child 2 "This is stupid why does it matter"
Child 1 : "That means it was Child 1"
Parents : "It matters, now I'm suspicious of both of you"
Child 2 : "Fine then check out beds for crumbs"
Child 1 : "Ahh what no let's not do that it was Child 1, just believe us don't look in our beds"
Parents : "Let us see your beds and decide for ourselves"
They don't let us know the actual plan. That's not the point of the Q posts... (at least from the way I see it)
Future proves past suggests that the purpose of the posts is a to provide proof of the plan after the event happens, without outright exposing the plan.
Metaphor time!: If I tell you that I can predict the lottery, but only tell you the numbers after the results are called, there's nothing to prove that I knew them before. The only way to prove that I knew them is to create a proof before they're called. But if I just say before they are called what the numbers will be then everyone who see's them will pick those numbers, or worse they may call off the lottery to stop anyone using the numbers. I would have to provide the proof in such a way as its only decodable after the lottery results are in.
We aren't the only people with access to these posts, and we don't want the plan to be known before it can be actioned. If we knew, they would know.
The thing to take away from this is that its a good thing USAID is mentioned but no one picked up on it, it means the posts worked in providing the proof without exposing the plan. And lets look forward to what else is still to be revealed!
👀 Yellow Tie....