I can see where you are coming from- interesting, indeed!
The weapons of our warfare are not carnal (the way the world does things) but are mighty to the pulling down of strongholds.
The end does NOT justify the means.
Yes, If you could comment with how you did that, I'd be appreciative. I forgot, since I don't do it as often as I should here!
Consider this: Kavanaugh wrote his own dissent, and also gave any stickler for the 'rule of law' types (read Gorsuch) a 'heads up' on what could be coming:
That's a good question - I remember reading about Roberts being associated with Epstein - don't recall any of the others...
would appreciate any digs on this, feel free to post here!:
Indeed! Kavanaugh has given the other two of President Trump's appointees a way out, you can read about it here:
Not per se' - see the path Kavanaugh made, above, and both my comments and u/Swampthings247 comments.
That implies that Congress passed the Tariff Act first! If you put all the information together, you have two routes to get the tariffs through:
-
You find which 'statutory box' needs to be checked, get it done quickly, and make emergency SCOTUS appeal.
-
You go through the legislative branch, and get Congress on board for tariffs. (Using the standing filibuster if necessary)
(See u/Swampthing247 comments above....)
(I don't link Q posts often enough to remember the code, and feel rather foolish for that , so here's the link:
So I presume if the 'right statutory box' is found, Gorsuch and Barrett would reinstate them? I'm iffy on Barrett, but Gorsuch seems to be a stickler for legality - and in many ways that is a very good thing. I hope the right route is found quickly!
There's quite a bit of evidence for the corruption of CPS, no matter what country! , https://parentalrights.org/child_protective_services/
The original context refers to the Hebrew people in exile in Babylon:
…10For this is what the LORD says: “When Babylon’s seventy years are complete, I will attend to you and confirm My promise to restore you to this place. 11For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, to give you a future and a hope. 12Then you will call upon Me and come and pray to Me, and I will listen to you.…
However, prophecies sometimes are fulfilled more than once....
I'm hopeful that there is a plan to protect the Israelis that do have a functioning conscience and who desire to do what is actually right.
And of course, Ehud Barak is right in the middle of all of the happenings, as the leading member of the Left wing Labor party. Neither he nor Epstein wanted any more of the 'wrong kind of Jews' coming to Israel - those that care about the meaning of the Scripture, or doing what is right.
Feel free to comment on my Karoline Leavitt post with a link to this post, or may I link to it?
Thank you! and thank you again for the direct link to this post. Great ammo for Karoline Leavitt!
You don't have to support any stupid month even if you are not racist...(IMHO)
the whole X thread is worth a read - Note picture of King Charles in the Muslim head garb.....
Agreed. If any nation is getting foreign aid, we are being lied to.
Doesn't need to nuke the filibuster, just needs to use the standing filibuster (old school) rule, fifty one votes passes essential bills.
All foreign aid and all pork projects need to be dumped, too.
You and me both.
He also :
-
Hated Netanyahu, and really liked Ehud Barak
-
Wanted the 'right kinds' of Jews in Israel
I still have an EIB money clip and a Dan's Bake Sale Shirt packed in my things somewhere, and a box of Limbaugh Letters - One of which has a letter from me in it. He had a great sense of humor, and wasn't afraid to use it against neo - cons and liberals.
UPDATE
President Trump has other tools in the toolbox to legally keep the tariffs in place, SCOTUS ruled that certain of the tariffs are in the interest of national security, such as the ones on aluminum and steel. There may be others that fall under this category or other statutes that can be used!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/president-trump-responds-after-u-s-supreme-court/