Conveniently its after 6 years (statue of limitations). What recourse can be had for these crimes?

6 years have gone by. This is memory holed in so many. People can't even remember what happened last week in such a chaotic 24/7 news cycle. Will there be anyone held accountable is the real question I have.

If this happens, Iran would become the largest glass formation on the planet.

https://x.com/i/status/2076754296352145803 cover 2020 election fraud. Happening happenings

I know nothing but my speculation is that he framed his trip around the timeline the media announced but reality was it was days earlier than the photos broadcast.

Its dangerous to have media coverage and locations/travel timelines known so he could have easily been there earlier than what was stated in the media for protection and easily been home when he died. Just my 2 cents.

Yep. Didn't people learn anything when the government came to help them when they issued gold and silver certificates lol

Why they would call the government to come help them excavate it is insane. Load it up and shut up.

This is a big concern. Are they upholding the constitution or following orders. Indoctrination and subordination. We all know / saw what covid did.

Must be a lot of cleanup in the reflection pond?

Fun fact - The founding fathers never expected the constitution to be a static document.

From grok Yes, the Founding Fathers expected the Constitution to be updated and revised after ratification. They designed it as an imperfect but improvable framework, deliberately including a formal amendment process (Article V) to allow peaceful changes based on experience, without resorting to revolution or violence.

Key Evidence from the Framers Article V was non-controversial and intentional**: At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, delegates recognized the document's flaws (e.g., no Bill of Rights, structural issues). George Mason argued: "Amendments therefore will be necessary, and it will be better to provide for them in an easy, regular and Constitutional way than to trust to chance and violence." Alexander Hamilton echoed this, calling for an "easy mode" to fix defects. They rejected the Articles of Confederation's rigidity**: The prior framework required unanimous state approval for changes, which paralyzed reform. The Framers chose a balanced supermajority process (proposal by 2/3 of Congress or state applications, ratification by 3/4 of states) to make amendments feasible but not too easy. Madison in Federalist No. 43**: He explained that Article V "guards equally against that extreme facility, which would render the Constitution too mutable; and that extreme difficulty, which might perpetuate its discovered faults." Useful alterations "suggested by experience" were anticipated. Ratification debates**: Federalists, including Hamilton and Washington, assured skeptics that amendments could (and would) follow ratification. This helped secure approval, leading quickly to the Bill of Rights (1791). Washington noted a "constitutional door is open for such amendments as shall be thought necessary."

Broader Philosophy The Framers were Enlightenment thinkers who believed in progress through reason and experience. They did not claim a monopoly on wisdom and viewed the Constitution as adaptable to future circumstances (e.g., population growth, new issues). Gouverneur Morris stated they did "the best we could; leaving it with those who should come after us to take counsel from experience." Thomas Jefferson (though not at the Convention) famously argued constitutions should expire every generation, reflecting a related view that the living should not be ruled by the dead.

They expected amendments for corrections, rights protections, and adaptations—but not constant tinkering. The high thresholds ensured broad consensus, preserving stability and "veneration" for the document over time.

In practice, early amendments (Bill of Rights, 11th, 12th) validated this vision. The process has been used 27 times total, though it has become rarer and more difficult in modern polarized times—something the Framers likely did not fully foresee due to the rise of stable political parties.

In short: The Constitution was never meant to be a static or "sacred" relic immune to change. The Founders built in a deliberate mechanism for revision precisely because they anticipated it would need updating by future generations. This adaptability was key to its ratification and long-term endurance.

Thanks...

There are these though... clearly speaking about arrests. But maybe there is something coded as arrests are in all caps. Acronym for something else?

Indictments, ARRESTs, and DECLAS will force WW coverage. Leaks, bribery, collusion re: media will force resignations w/ follow up criminal prosecution. Q

Are you ready to see ARRESTs? Are you ready to see PAIN? Are you ready to be part of history? Q

The first arrest will shock the world?

Synthetic shorts are worse than naked shorts. Synthetic allows for nothing and more nothing to crash a stock price on non existent shares.

It might be a good way to bring attention to the manipulation though, if it crashes and causes him another election. Maybe then there will be enough people awake to demand arrests?

New fed chairman, Trump's guy, will have to come up with a plan to save the markets. Trump is soo involved in market sentiment that it will be really bad for the market to crash on his watch.

Trump wont allow it.

Boost it up for safety.

Seems like a good deal to keep Iran in check. If they want peace they gotta earn it, as Vance and Trump say. A lot of incentive for them to be good.

When do we see how great of a deal this is, so we can stuff it down Obamas throat?