2
QKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Taking the Bible out of context is a dangerous sport. In the New Testament it is said, literally by Jesus Himself:

Matthew 25:31

31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

So it appears that this is in direct contradiction to what is posted here. And this is red text.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Potentially in jail. Yes it is an actual possibility.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if they can (which I am not sure), it would take easily over a year to wind its way there.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am actually astounded. I thought at most they would come in with 2-4 guilty just to appease the prosecution and it would be a slap on the wrist and he walks away. 34-0 was not even on my bingo card as a possibility honestly.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I figure by the end of next week or two weeks, it will be all reversed.

Based on what though? There is no legal precedent to do that outside of an appeal which will take months at best. What magic is going to reverse all this shit in two weeks?

3
QKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sooooo...nothing in this post said that he was confirmed dead. Only that the crash site has been found. I am not saying he is alive or dead. I am saying that no one has confirmed anything yet. Why do we post shit claiming one thing when the actual content is nothing of the sort? It really make us look bad.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

It makes a lot more sense than 'Oh we have a time machine crystal ball so the Northern Lights in 2024 mean that a post from six years ago is pointing to some mysterious thing that apparently didn't happen'. I wish we could all just see past the obvious bullshit shitposts and talk about what is real.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the concept that Q has a literal fucking time machine is retarded. If that were the case they would not have fucking deltas that you have to squint at to have them make sense. They would have said 'The election will be stolen but Biden will stay in power'. If you have a literal time machine you could control the world even if it is Read Only.

3
QKek 3 points ago +5 / -2

Shit like this is why people think we are retarded. This is in no way proof of anything. Why would they use this language on a secret access page? Come on people, think with your brain. This is completely fake and only being spread to make us look bad.

15
QKek 15 points ago +15 / -0

Exactly. Lizard people bullshit posted here just makes us all look like fucking retards.

3
QKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

The ruling specifically says that write in votes for him cannot be counted.

3
QKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is not in any way correct.

2
QKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ruling specifically says that write in votes for him cannot be counted.

2
QKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I were trying to put my words and/or decisions about sin into God's mouth I would definitely want someone to call me out on it.

-2
QKek -2 points ago +2 / -4

Fren, as a Christian, I think God would make an exception on this one.

What? You're saying that God would give someone a pass on one of the Ten Commandments? I hope that was a joke. And even if it was, it was not good at all. Rethink your humor maybe.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
QKek 0 points ago +1 / -1

I saw something on Twitter that said Trump was going to be put in jail tomorrow. Just because you saw it on Twitter does not make it true. Or even credible.

If Arab nations were going to attack Israel en masse they wouldn't be spreading leaks about that could find their way to Twitter. Notice how there were no leaks about Oct. 7th on Twitter the week prior.

2
QKek 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well the issue is that none of that makes any difference at all. If she were not eligible, she would not have been on the ticket. Sometimes the conspiracy theories are just that...theories. If you have any evidence to the contrary I would love to see it.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think unproductive datefagging by any other name is just moar unproductive datefagging. I've yet to see anything that validates Deltas as validated future events that actually occurred.

1
QKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great answer. Never stoop to their level and throw out accusations you cannot back up. No one "looks" like a pedo. Unless you have some pretty damning evidence you should not be doing this.

2
QKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

This judge looks like a pedo.

What does a pedo look like?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›