"artists"

kek!

Here’s a dive into page 170, found Sirhan S.’s A.M.O.R.C. connection and this led to Ed Butler, propagandist / CIA-friendly apologist, who diverted public attention away from Jim Garrison and research into who really did the assassinations.

Sirhan S. was a Rosicrucian AMORC member, joined in 1965 or ‘66. note: headquartered in San Jose, this Rosicrucian ancient-Egyptian-styled spiritualist society is different than and had legal disputes against Paschal Beverly Randolph’s Rosicrucian group of Quakertown, Pennsylvania.

this review summarizes how Ed Butler, propagandist, worked with CIA and others to frame a narrative of Sirhan Sirhan being a mysticist, propaganda done in strange fashion, because rather than Ed Butler showing the AMORC connection of Sirhan S., Ed Butler used Anthony Hilder to promote a wild, false idea of a Sirhan S. link to Blavatsky mysticism.

p. 170 of RFK release:

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/rfk/releases/2025/0418/44-sd-394-part_1_of_5.pdf

What was a Rosicrucian guy who was taught by correspondence self-hypnosis and metaphysical practices doing 2-3 feet away from Senator RFK when he was assassinated by someone firing from close range? Propagandist Ed Butler, connected with CIA personnel, worked to shape public opinion, diverting public attention away from the CIA and its activities surrounding the JFK and RFK assassinations.

Question: why did Butler do this propaganda? To draw attention away from finding the real shooter, and place a false conspiracy theory in the public’s mind, further obfuscating the facts.

Background setting to Los Angeles and RFK assassination:

Anthony Hilder who was in the music industry produced in 1967 with Myron Fagan “The Illuminati and the CFR”. Myron F. had been a Broadway starting in 1907 and wrote & directed plays 1925-1930. Mryon F. moved over to Hollywood where he became anticommunist, and his legacy included the recording made with Anthony.

ITT Intl. Telephone &Telegraph completed purchase of the Ambassador Hotel in 1968 where RFK was shot while greeting workers in the kitchen. ITT executives = part of military industrial complex. CEO Harold Geneen in 1970 worked with CIA in Chile to prevent the election of Salvador Allende. ITT provided telecomm. equipment to the Pentagon.

So at the CIA-friendly Ambassador Hotel, RFK was killed. Next analysis: CIA propaganda and Anthony Hilder and the Sirhan Sirhan mysticism angle — who orchestrated this? CIA propagandist Ed Butler!

Background and key figures, CIA related:

Ed Butler attended Army Management School in Virginia. Butler became interested in psycho-politics and anti-Communism. (REM: FBI dir. J. Edgar Hoover published Masters of Deceit in 1968. Not directly influenced by Hoover, Butler was a product of the anti-Comm. sentiments of the 1950s.)

Ed Butler recruited Clay Shaw in New Orleans for propaganda purposes. Ed Butler in 1963 also had contact with Oswald’s handler Guy Banister. Note: Jim Garrison researched Ed Butler and found Butler had some falling out with Clay Shaw and the propaganda group in New Orleans in ‘61.

Butler gravitated over to CIA relationships with Deputy Director Charles Cabell and psy-ops master Ed Lansdale. Butler was helping create INCA (Info. Council of the Americas). Eustis Reily worked with Butler’s project INCA. He owned Reily Coffee where Oswald worked May - July 1963!

Skipping past a lot of Oswald and JFK assassination details, review picks up just a year before the RFK assassination: Ed Butler wrote an attack against Jim Garrison in the New York Times (12/24/67). Butler is no light-weight player in the propaganda machine. Ed Butler next set up propaganda shop in…. LA.

LA scene 1968: Ed Butler, Sirhan Sirhan, and Anthony J. Hilder.

Ed Butler published his “Revolution is My Profession” book blaming Communists for the “theories” that tried to link the CIA to schemes including the JFK assassination. Next Ed Butler connected with Anthony Hilder, wanting to frame Sirhan S. as a Blavatsky-inspired mysticism follower. This is weird, because Sirhan S. had actually been studying AMORC Rosicrucian mysticism and spiritism,not Blavatsky teachings.

Anthony Hilder wrote with John Steinbacher: “Robert Francis Kennedy The Man, The Mysticism, The Murder”. Though they may not have known of Sirhan S.’s AMORC connection, or maybe they did, the authors did not state the connection. Ed Butler, the CIA-friendly propagandist seems to have utilized Anthony H.’s 61 page booklet to further a false conspiracy theory narrative focussed on Sirhan S., potentially blocking researchers from looking in a better direction. to seek out who the actual assassin really was.

Source and references for the material regarding Ed Butler’s activities:

https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/ed-butler-expert-in-propaganda-and-psychological-warfare. Jan. 10, 2004 by James DiEugenio

Anthony Hilder has been identified by the partner of Dr. Len Horowitz (public health advocate) as having Cointelpro deep state ties. R.I.P. Sherri Kane, you lived fighting the deep state in Hawaii, cared for American hero Dr. Len Horowitz, shared 528 hz. love frequency healing music, and named Cointelpro agitators including Anthony Hilder. 17 stars for you, Sherri a d Dr. Len.

https://www.archives.gov/research/rfk

Wouldn't the U.S., and the rest of the world, be much better off if the CIA was TOTALLY dissolved at this point in history?

Artists? You mean Autists?

I asked Grok for a synopsis of the newly released documents here is the reply: The recent release of approximately 10,000 pages of documents related to the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) on June 5, 1968, ordered by President Donald Trump under Executive Order 14176 on January 23, 2025, has provided new details but no definitive bombshells that fundamentally alter the established narrative. Below, I summarize key findings from the declassified files, focusing on any surprising or notable elements, while critically examining the information for potential gaps or inconsistencies.web2 Key Details from the Released Documents 1.Sirhan Sirhan’s Motives and Writings: •The documents include handwritten notes by Sirhan Sirhan, the convicted assassin, explicitly stating his obsession with killing RFK. He wrote that RFK “must be disposed of” and described his “unshakable obsession” with the act. •Sirhan, a Palestinian Christian, expressed anger over RFK’s support for Israel, particularly following the 1967 Six-Day War. A newspaper article about RFK’s pro-Israel stance was found in Sirhan’s pocket at the time of his arrest, and he later admitted this fueled his hatred. •Surprising Element: Sirhan’s notes also include a broader call for the “overthrow of the current president” (Lyndon B. Johnson at the time) and pledges of support for communist Russia and China. This suggests a more complex ideological motivation beyond his stated anti-Zionist beliefs, potentially pointing to radical political influences not fully explored in earlier investigations. 2.Rumors of Prior Threats: •FBI documents reveal interviews with tourists who, in May 1968, heard rumors in Israel that RFK had been shot or that assassination attempts had occurred in places like Milwaukee or Nebraska. These rumors predate the actual assassination by weeks. •Surprising Element: The State Department cables, as noted by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, include foreign governments discussing RFK’s assassination before it happened, raising questions about whether intelligence agencies had prior knowledge or if these were speculative rumors. This could suggest lapses in security or unheeded warnings, though the documents don’t confirm actionable intelligence. 3.Near-Massacre Threat: •The files describe a plot by an individual who threatened to board RFK’s funeral plane, potentially targeting the Kennedy family in a broader attack. This was thwarted, but it highlights the intense hostility surrounding RFK’s death. •Surprising Element: The existence of this secondary threat is a new detail, indicating that the assassination may have been part of a broader climate of targeted violence against the Kennedys, possibly beyond Sirhan’s lone actions. It raises questions about whether other actors or groups were involved, though no concrete links are established in the released files. 4.Autopsy and Ballistic Evidence: •Newly released autopsy images and diagrams confirm that the fatal shot entered RFK’s head behind his right ear at a distance of approximately one inch, consistent with Chief Medical Examiner Thomas Noguchi’s 1968 findings. •The documents reaffirm that Sirhan was in front of RFK, raising ongoing questions about how he could have fired the fatal shot from such close range behind RFK’s ear. This fuels speculation about a second gunman, a theory supported by RFK Jr. and others. •Surprising Element: Acoustic evidence from a 1968 audio tape (the Pruszynski tape) suggests 13–14 shots were fired, while Sirhan’s .22-caliber revolver held only 8 bullets. This discrepancy, noted in the files, strengthens claims of additional shooters, though no new evidence definitively confirms this. 5.Conspiracy Theories and Second Gunman Claims: •The documents do not resolve persistent conspiracy theories, particularly those involving a second gunman or figures like security guard Thane Eugene Cesar, who was behind RFK and armed at the time. Cesar’s ownership of a .22-caliber pistol and inconsistencies about its sale (he claimed to have sold it before the assassination, but records show the sale occurred months later) remain suspicious but unproven. •Allegations of CIA involvement or a “Manchurian candidate” scenario (where Sirhan was programmed to kill) are mentioned but lack substantiation in the new files. •Surprising Element: RFK Jr.’s vocal support for these theories, including his claim that Cesar, not Sirhan, killed his father, is indirectly bolstered by the autopsy and ballistic inconsistencies. However, the files do not provide new evidence to confirm his assertions, leaving these claims speculative. 6.LAPD Handling of Evidence: •The files highlight past criticisms of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), including claims by witness Paul Schrade (who was wounded in the shooting) that the LAPD destroyed evidence, hid ballistic data, and covered up signs of a second gunman. •Surprising Element: The controversy over RFK’s blood-stained clothing being displayed at a 2010 conference in Las Vegas, noted in the files, underscores ongoing issues with evidence preservation and raises questions about the integrity of the investigation. Critical Analysis and Outstanding Questions •Lack of Resolution on Second Gunman: Despite the detailed autopsy and acoustic evidence, the documents neither confirm nor debunk the second gunman theory. The absence of new ballistic analysis or witness testimonies leaves this as a persistent gap. The claim of 13–14 shots versus Sirhan’s 8-bullet revolver is compelling but not conclusive without further forensic data. •Pre-Assassination Rumors: The reports of foreign governments discussing RFK’s assassination beforehand are intriguing but vague. Were these credible threats ignored, or merely rumors amplified by the era’s political tensions? The files don’t clarify, suggesting either intelligence failures or overblown speculation. •Sirhan’s Ideological Breadth: His support for communist powers like Russia and China is a surprising addition to his known anti-Zionist motives. This could indicate external influences or radicalization, but the files don’t explore whether Sirhan had connections to broader political networks. •Remaining Files: Approximately 50,000 pages related to RFK’s assassination remain unreleased, according to some sources. What these contain—whether routine records or more sensitive intelligence—remains unknown, fueling speculation about withheld truths. •Establishment Narrative: The official narrative—that Sirhan acted alone—remains intact, but the new details (e.g., shot count discrepancies, pre-assassination rumors) challenge its completeness. The lack of definitive evidence for a conspiracy could reflect either a thorough investigation or a deliberate cover-up, as critics like RFK Jr. argue. Surprising Highlights •The pre-assassination rumors reported by foreign governments and tourists suggest a possible intelligence lapse or a highly charged rumor mill, neither of which was adequately addressed at the time. •Sirhan’s broader ideological statements (supporting communist regimes) add complexity to his motives, potentially pointing to unexplored influences. •The near-massacre threat against the Kennedy family on the funeral plane is a chilling new detail, hinting at a wider scope of danger. •The acoustic evidence of 13–14 shots remains a strong point of contention, supporting conspiracy theories but lacking conclusive proof. Conclusion The released documents provide fresh insights into Sirhan’s motives, pre-assassination rumors, and ballistic discrepancies, but they stop short of rewriting the history of RFK’s assassination. The most surprising elements—foreign rumors, a potential family-targeted attack, and Sirhan’s communist sympathies—raise questions about the broader context of the killing but don’t confirm alternative narratives. The unresolved issues, particularly around the second gunman theory and unreleased files, suggest that the full truth may still be obscured, whether by design or oversight. Scholars and researchers will likely need months to fully parse the 10,000 pages, and the remaining 50,000 pages could hold further surprises.

I like Robert, he's so funny & smart.

Makes all the legal mumbo jumbo interesting & entertaining

Artists-----don't you love spellcheck? Kek

Mark Groubert has a good breakdown of the RFK docs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pqr-sJuRbg&t=72s

How about Kevin Bacon? In the PDF it talks about a building of the Rosicrucian order called Francis Bacon Auditorium at 1342 Naglee Ave in San Jose, CA

IF you look into the name Francis Bacon...you get this guy on the left https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2022/apr/17/friend-of-francis-bacon-snubs-the-tate-to-give-art-works-to-paris-instead#img-1

Now look at the guy associated as his friend and later was given some of the paintings from Francis Bacon and his name is Barry Joule

Now look at Barry Joule now and compare him to Kevin Bacon KEVIN--https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/gettyimages-1304643306.jpg?resize=1200:*

Barry Joule--https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/03/30/multimedia/00francis-bacon-001/00bacon-secret-hqwj-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp

Makes ya go Hummmmmm....interesting. Barry Joule and Kevin Bacon look EARILY SIMILAR

Que Sirhan, Sirhan...

Tulsi is CIA, and that should say everything.

Lee Harvey Oswald even fire his rifle that day?