Everyone else:
"Boo you whore"
Where's the video of the teleprompter exploding though? That streak from the "bullet" seems to be coming from the correct trajectory to be an actual bullet.
Film speed as in ISO? Last I checked 1/8000 is a shutter speed format. Shutter speed also makes a lot more sense when talking about the motion blur on fast moving objects.
Priming the public?
Multiple bullets is the predominant theory.
So it definitely was Crooks and not Maxwell Yearick?
I like this take. It is notable that the eye on top is cut off.
Sorry for making fun lol. I think the passion of whites delivery makes for a good watch
In the time since your comment you could have watched it 23 times over lol
Trump was not insulated. There is a photo of one of the actual bullets. It takes way too many mental gymnastics to justify this being a staged event.
It's 2 minutes lol
TrUmP sTaGeD tHiS tO EsCaPe ThE LaW
As long as we agree that there aren't two versions of Trump giving speeches in front of a crowd, I can accept everything else.
Body doubles can't have the same personas and gravitas and vocal patterns, or the same leadership instinct to do the photo op and fist pump. If Robert Trump was doing that speech why can't we just have Robert run for president? This line of thinking feels like such a dead end.
Agreed. I reject this line of thinking entirely. Either this was a real assassination attempt, or it was somehow pulled off with zero actual bullets and several crisis actors in the audience.
That wasn't a body double though. The real Trump was shot yesterday.
What about the blood on his ear and the people who died? Are you suggesting crisis actors? What about the photo series that captured the bullet in midair? Your line of thinking opens Pandora's box in a way I'm not comfortable with.
I'm getting conflicting messages on this one. Apparently there were two Thomas Crooks, and the one who donated $15 was much older than 20 years old.
Certainly fits the profile lol. Do we have more info on this, the location and date? Also maybe more pixels?
Supposedly there were multiple bullets
Wow. You pretty much called it.
I'm not too concerned about the missing crowd. That can 100% be explained through low camera angles. What I'm wondering about is the speed and placement of the bullet. How hard would it be to edit something like this into the photo? I've seen this photo floating around and it seems hard to believe a photo could be so perfectly timed.
In my view, either this event was orchestrated for optics or it was a real gunman shooting at Trump.
Q knowing about it would mean it was either orchestrated for optics, or that Q is in part, a supernatural or actual time traveling/prophetic source of Intel. You can't game out a gunman missing a shot like this, not even with militarily level planning.
The implications of this being "the shot heard around the world" are staggering
THEY NEVER THOUGHT HE WOULD MISS