Why would the U.S. "invade" South Africa?
If South Africa keeps going for another 10-years like it is... it will be an impoverished 3rd world nation that can't feed itself and practically zero GDP.
At that point, we wouldn't need to invade. SA will be about as relevant as Somalia or Zimbabwe.
The EU will keep fighting to the last Ukranian. It doesn't have to make sense. It only has to make money for the few people at the top.
Consider this a win.
If we are billed for work that USAID already completed... then we have full rights to AUDIT THEIR WORK AND THE ACCOUNTING BOOKS.
If we weren't obligated to pay for work completed... then we would have no rights to audit. Let the DOGE begin.
Zelenski isn't even President of Ukraine at this point. His term as President EXPIRED almost 12-months ago.
He has just been occupying office since he cancelled the presidential election a year ago (knowing that he would lose).
Any deal that Zelenski signs isn't worth anything. He has no legal authority anymore.
"Last Thursday, CIA chief William Burns made his 10th secret visit to Ukraine..."
OK... then it's not so 'secret', now is it?
OK... now start the 24-hour clock.
If Victoria Nuland hasn't filed a lawsuit against Flynn for slander by then... we'll know that the allegations are TRUE.
If the DOJ wants to prove collusion as part of the RICO investigations... these videos provide proof of coordination and willingness to participate in the fraud.
Trump and the Republican Leadership should already be prepared for this.
If disruptions start, then STOP the speech and have security immediately come in and escort out the entire row of people. Not just the one disrupter... but remove everyone in that row.
Next disruption, stop the speech, rinse and repeat. Otherwise, if you only take out the single disrupter, then you'll have 50 more disrupters waiting their turn. By taking out whole rows of Democrats... you are making it clear that the entire Democrat Party is responsible for their own people, and bear the consequences together for not controlling others.
When about 10 rows, or roughly 300 people are escorted out of the hall... that is most of the entire Democrat Party in Congress. The remainder have a choice.
Call 1-800-Dial-A-Prayer
Maybe invite him back for the annual Easter Egg Roll. After all, Zelenski meets the height requirements for the 8-12 year old age group.
NATO doesn't realize (or maybe they DO)... that if NATO attacks Russia, then China will join forces with Russia and attack.
What choice would China have? If Russia falls, then China would be next on the agenda. China would have to join forces with Russia to defeat their common enemy. This isn't the Western World vs. Russia. This would be Western World vs. Everyone Else.
Trump ought to beat them to the punch.
His opening of the State-of-the-Union speech should begin with ... "I want everyone here to know that the Pope is in very bad health, that he doesn't have much longer on this earth... and I intend to work closely with his replacement soon". :>)
The Deep State will make SURE that the Pope survives for another 5-years. They don't want Trump to be right about anything... and they certainly don't want Trump to be buddies with the next Pope.
Problem solved.
It's not OUR fault that Russia believed us. :>)
There was plenty of evidence that we can never be trusted to keep our word... but they chose to believe us despite that. Now they know.
The EU doesn't know what to expect if they station troops in Ukraine to fight against Russia. There are TWO different types of warfare... and they've only seen one of them.
-
Fighting against a neighboring country that USED to be part of your own... and 1/3rd of the population speaks your ethnic language and has a similar culture... and family relatives live on both sides of the border. Eventually that war will end, and you will still be neighboring countries. You don't want to completely destroy a neighbor, but instead be very precise in attacking so that you don't ruin too much of their infrastructure.
-
Fighting against nations that have NO BUSINESS being on your border attacking you. They don't speak your language, have a completely different culture and destroying them will have few consequences to you.
If French, British and especially German troops enter Ukraine to fight against Russia on it's own border... they will quickly realize it's Case #2. The gloves will come off, and their own cities will be subject to full attack. EU isn't ready for that.
Maybe European NATO can invite Jamaica and Mexico to join. :>)
One thing about rare earth metals mining and refining... it's NOT cheap and requires serious investment. In unstable Ukraine, buyer beware.
Norway soldiers.
It's embarrassing that the descendants of vikings became such pansies.
It's time to shut down ALL NGO funding until full audits can be conducted on each.
"EUROPE WILL SEND TROOPS TO DIRECTLY FIGHT RUSSIA IN UKRAINE AND THAT THE GLOBALIST DEMAND THE U.S. UNDER NATO ARTICLE 5, MUST JOIN IN..."
NATO Article 5 states that Nato members will come to the defence of an ally which comes under attack. That DOESN'T mean we have to come to defense of an ally who attacks another country, or declares war on another.
The defense pact is about supporting each ally if they are attacked unprovoked.
If EU pokes the Russian bear, any response by Russia was provoked.
We're not paying for this.
You break it... you buy it.
I don't remember EVER having watched the Oscar's.
I don't care about people stroking each other's egos.
Use it against them. Leak FALSE intelligence about raids... and then raid somewhere else. Fill the media with false leaks. Eventually nobody will believe anything they hear.
No. Dumb question.
Q: What do they ALL have in common?
A: They all have $Billions in U.S. funding being cut off. :>)
It's always those hyphenated last names. Beware the hyphen.