1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry, but if you know someone is a pedophile, do you let them go about their pedophile lifestyle for 6+ years before you only hint at it on Truth Social?

3
RisingTidePod 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, it might happen when this is a 6-year delta.

Or 7?

8?

-1
RisingTidePod -1 points ago +1 / -2

But, I also don’t think the comm is for us, we just have enough knowledge to know it is a comm.

You realize this forum is accessible to anyone with internet access right?

In any serious encrypted or coded communication, the code would be changed the moment it's discovered by anyone but the intended recipient.

-1
RisingTidePod -1 points ago +1 / -2

And if that barrel has 300 million apples and you have 70+ years to find the good ones?

0
RisingTidePod 0 points ago +1 / -1

Omg, this is not going to get through to you, but the bottom of the frame is at or above the heads of everyone in the crowd, and somehow you think this guy's hip level is in frame here? Is he 12 feet tall?

0
RisingTidePod 0 points ago +1 / -1

He's using the built-in camera app. He just rotated the phone after he started recording. If you have an iPhone you can try this out for yourself.

0
RisingTidePod 0 points ago +1 / -1

Come on, try to be objective here. We don't see hip level. We see the phone move less than 6 inches (like two phone widths) in the shot when it moves down out of frame. You can literally measure how far it moves before it's out of frame if you look up the size of an iPhone.

https://imgur.com/a/TCLYiTb

Edit: Yes, you can measure things this way when you know the movement plane is roughly parallel to the camera's picture plane. Source: I survey things for my job, and most of the people in this thread are speculating about things they don't seem to understand even at a basic level.

0
RisingTidePod 0 points ago +1 / -1

Again, if the camera stays pointed at the subject (Trump), moving it up/down/left/right will not change the image much, especially if most of the image is more than a few feet away. The only thing that will be noticeably moving in the image are the parts closest to the camera. It's called parallax.

Watch the few seconds after 7:35. As the phone moves to the left, there is a guy who comes into frame at the bottom left corner. When the phone moves to the right, that guy goes back out of the frame to the left.

This is normal, and you can see the effect yourself if you try it with your own phone. You may need to set up some stuffed animals or gijoes or barbie dolls or whatever as a stand-in for the crowd.

-2
RisingTidePod -2 points ago +1 / -3

A wide angle does not move you further back into the crowd.

No but it does give that impression to people who don't really understand how cameras work.

It also doesn't make your phone stop tracking with its movement

If you don't rotate the phone while moving your arm (panning), anything in the image that is somewhat far away will not move.

3
RisingTidePod 3 points ago +5 / -2

What is on his phone screen is NOT live. The crowd on his phone is much deeper

It's just a wider angle. You can even see the same white-sleeved arm crossing over Trump diagonally in both shots.

an iPhone when recording video shows the elapsed recording time in a red box with white numbers. Its always at the top of the screen and reads from left to right, whether recording horizontally or vertically.

If you start recording vertically and then turn your phone it will be on the left. When this person plays back their video it will be sideways.

It appears someone is recording it from much further back and this person is displaying it on their phone. We are guessing to show crowd size to the cameras.

Again, you can achieve this exact result by hitting the 0.5X button to switch to the wide camera.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, you're obviously not smart enough to understand that breast cancer starts in the breasts and can be somewhat predicted and that's why some women have their breasts removed to prevent it, while diabetes does not start in legs and removing legs does not prevent diabetes, so I guess we're done here.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, having breasts is much more likely to cause cancer than not having them.

Having legs has no impact on getting diabetes, even if your legs might show symptoms if you do get it.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having legs doesn't cause diabetes.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stormy Daniels recanted the statement and said that an affair had occurred. She said her denials were due to a non-disclosure agreement.

Also:

She describes Trump's penis as "smaller than average" but "not freakishly small."

"He knows he has an unusual penis," Daniels writes. "It has a huge mushroom head. Like a toadstool..."

"I lay there, annoyed that I was getting fucked by a guy with Yeti pubes and a dick like the mushroom character in Mario Kart...

"It may have been the least impressive sex I'd ever had, but clearly, he didn't share that opinion."

Also:

https://www.google.com/search?q=stormy+daniels+willing+to+testify

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

That seems to be putting a whole lot of faith in one man, no?

A man who is currently on trial for allegedly using campaign funds to silence a woman he slept with right after his third son was born to his third wife, and his main defense so far is calling her names while ranting in all caps on social media.

I mean, I want to believe and all, but that is not going to be the basis for my faith.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Propaganda has come from both sides in every war. Why would Russia, well-known for its propaganda, not do so this time?

Even suggesting that sounds like Russian propaganda.

by quinoa
2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is what I don't get about the love for this guy. If he was a character in a movie, he'd be the bad guy.

Like, would you let your daughter date this guy?

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably just means version, just as it has for all the previous versions.

-1
RisingTidePod -1 points ago +1 / -2

No, it's really not. It's just a software update version number. If they for some reason went from 11.2 to 11.4, that might mean something.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about just putting up someone who would be a good speaker of the house?

Are there no Republicans worthy that would get the votes?

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

big corporations outright admitting that Dying Suddenly is happening to their officially certified-healthy pilots

Except that the only indication of that happening is a apparent screenshot of a post by some Angel Linn who claims to be married to a pilot.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›