That is the idea. They won't have the funds to continue, or they will empty their reserves now when they know they have 4 years of this coming.
The whole intent is to get them to stop filing the unconstitutional challenges and wasting whitehouse time
The idea is they will have to choose their battles , rather than send dozens of garbage suits. They won't have the operating funds to spend 100s of millions per suit.
Therefore the number of them will become much more manageable, and just as easy to knock down.
This is big, this needs done everywhere. If your state is not listed, contact your state congressman and senators, push on them to make ivermectin over the counter. It's already passed the timeframe for it, no reason not to
Sounds accurate. In the move to "green" energy we've shut down a lot of reliable power sources, including coal and nuclear. Ironically both are cleaner and better for the environment than windmills by a lot. Hydro is a very clean power method. It's time we got back to opening these back up and expanded our power supply again.
The biggest issue we face is the same as with oil drilling. Once they're shut down, it takes month/years to spin them back up, and the companies want assurances they won't be forced to just shut them back down again.
Now your thinking. 👍
They accrued and paid for the cost already, agreed. However, there is a good chance it was an expense they couldn't recoup on. For one, it was their side who needed the footage, so it was a court/trial expense. For two, depending on a lot of factors, they probably had to eat most of that cost. Judges consider the burden of providing evidence, but not always.
Now the FOIA is up, i know there is a clause when you do a request that the department being FOIA'd can ask a reasonable sum to recoup the cost of retrieving that data, though it is usually just enough to cover the cost of the paper and some minimum wage schmuck to grab the file and run copies, and postage.
Anyways, I can see the hardware being a rack mounted server with some redundancies so it makes the trip safely. By itself right there could cost upwards of anywhere from $25k to $100k if they go for the nice stuff, etc.
So I'm guessing the rest is they are trying to recoup the labor involved in the recovery, even though it's already been done. They could be double dipping, or they could be trying to discourage judicial watch from getting it with an obnoxious ask. Or they could be doing a combination of them, or all of them. I'd need to see the actual filing and response to make a call.
The second part yes.
If you are a constitutionallist, there are very few bills passed in the last 100 years which the federal gov't has any business passing.
There are like, 16-18 things the fed is instructed to do. Everything else is left to the states. If we have 100s of departments, something has gone very wrong.
Even if you know how to drywall & mud and tape and prime and paint, working on someone's house without permission is bad news.
@Stray502 has the best advice. Fess up and offer to fix.
A lot of people would be more pissed if you tried to fix it up before they got home, it is deception. On top of that a rush job could easily make it worse.
Niagra Falls generates a massive amount of power, which makes it a no brainer to import to anywhere it can reach. Michigan has a long history of importing power including from Indiana.
It's like they're allergic to power plants.
"Who cares if he never passed a bill."
That is a big deal. If a bill doesn't pass, then you dont want fraud, extra spending. In truth I wish more didn't pass bills.
"Big problem if he didn't believe in the voter fraud though."
This is the sticking point.
On top of that, lets see if they admit the regs to do it. If a 40k chicken barn comes down with 1 case of bird flu, the entire barn is put down.
If 2 come down with bird flu in a 500,000 bird barn, the whole thing is put down. That is how you easily put down 140 million birds with little effort. 😡
As sucky as that is, it is correct. 100%.
Releasing it right now isn't going to save that one baby.
This is to prevent the next 1 million babies being nailed to a board (no sarcasm).
If safeguards aren't in play, millions could be killed. If a domestic footsoldier we haven't taken out yet has a dirty bomb, or something equally stupid, we'll suffer 100x for the impatience.
But yes, it's out there, it cannot wait forever.
O k, good enough. However, have you actually looked at what this bill does? Do you understand this is a core part of our movement and strategy?
There is a reason the democrats are blocking it. If this was something that would benefit them, don't you think they would be voting to pass it?
I care about all my frens here, so maybe you should consider this is less about you holding Trump accountable, and more that you just don't want to see one of your idols fall, or at least consider that he screwed up, or might actually be bad.
I've had several of these moments since 2017 and each one sucked.
His motivations are irrelevant. If he is too short sighted to see what this bill does strategically and forgo his TDS, he is acting no better than the dems.
The only other reason to vote against it is to stop the changes Trump is there to do.
I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Best case he didn't think it through when he attempted to log jam the whole government restructuring. Mainly because the alternative is, he is in bed with the cabal.
Try for sedition, execute on guilty verdict.