Merry Christmas to you too fren!
Thank you for the elaboration, I understand your point about the DOT situation now.
Agreed, that should have been made to work better, so yes.
I guess you could then say my story goes to illustrate how a solution was found for a problem dispite gov't incompetency. 🤔
Yes I agree with you. Would have been better to solve the root problem.
Not trying to be argumentative and you do have a point.
Just bringing up 2 things:
-
Absolute statements are frequently wrong. You used the word always, so just letting you know in this case saying "always" isn't true.
-
Years ago gov. Mitchell Daniels was not a perfect Governor of Indiana, but he solved a LOT of issues, including the issue of the 80/90 toll road across the northern part of the state. The state had run it for years, done some crappy leases, and the solutions never worked. Terrible roads and draining money from the state. Mis-management galore. So Daniels comes in and says, OK, we've given the state a chance, others chances, were gonna lease private at no profit ("for a dollar") and be done. He was almost lynched for it, but proof was in the pudding.
He said just sit and watch, and while yes, the state didn't make money, it stopped losing money too. The private firms came through and the roads were fixed and became better.
After all that complaining his reply was something similar to, it's not costing taxpayer money and the roads are fixed and safe. What's the problem?
Sweet deals aren't the problem. Problem is making the deals properly and enforcing them.
Having clauses to maintain the roads all the way to last day of lease means you have good people working for you in govt, and enforcing them and having big penalties for lack of follow through means you have more good people .
No company wants a toll road lease if they can't make money, and no state should give them freely without assurances of care.
Ultimately, if fed and state can't care for them, let the private sector. Yes, if done correctly (like everything else) it will work.
"What’s particularly striking is the role of early scribes. Far from being passive transcribers, they actively engaged with the material, reinterpreting and preserving it in ways that reflected their own spiritual and societal realities. "
Scribes reinterpreting it like a revisionist history, and we all know who likes to do that.... ZH is about as trustworthy as the paper they're written on. Oh wait....
Can't put the genie back in the bottle.
Better to have laws clearly stating proper use and ethics and punishments.
Ever see the anime series Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex? It deals a lot with the ethics of medical, gov't, and social organizations as related to bio/cyber implants and bodily autonomy. It goes over the concept of technological restraint that is so often lacking in the technology industry and our government and culture.
Just because you have the technological impetus to do something does not grant you the moral right to do so. Just because it can be easily done by reprobates doesn't mean you say 'OK it's fine', because you can't easily regulate it.
Kayleigh was never in the know for Q, which was a good thing. She would not have been able to do her job as effectively as she did had she known.
However, this also meant her understanding was only surface level. At surface level things looked terrible for Trump. You had to look deeper to really understand what was going on.
She went into survival mode, which should be expected for a superficial normie, she saw the tides turning and switched with them. That is survival for anyone without a foundation.
I'm not trying to excuse her decisions. She made really bad choices, but they really only look that bad because she was right there front and center compared to President Trump and those that know.
Think of your normie friend, and put them in her position and imagine what they would have done. I'd wager they would make the same decision, possibly worse.
As effective as she was, there is no way she should be allowed back unless they think she can handle the full disclose and buy into the plan. I think she's too mercenary for that so IMO, she's a no go.
No no no, don't waste money on space suits. Just send them and a suitcase. It'll be like alone, we get the feed and they have to figure it out. Except there is no rescue boat.
Only problems would be, I think, it would mainly be corpses. 🤔
I bid $100,000.00 USD. I know, crazy money for actual value, but i see a big payoff selling pay-per-view to watch all the talking heads being fired, watching them cry as they're ridiculed, then arrested for sedition. Shoot, if I can get rights to air the trials, convictions and executions, people would pay a premium to tune in.
I want a robot butler and maid.
Also hoverboard.
And a jetpack. You can keep the rocketeer helmet.