2
RussianAnon13569 2 points ago +2 / -0

So far it seems the real mastermind behind - an informal grouping within the special services of Ukraine on behalf of an informal political and economic group in the UK

4
RussianAnon13569 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here is some explanation from Russia (Dugin): Peskov's statements are ideological in nature. He usually softened (I think it was fully agreed) the harsh language of Putin, who had already called the war a "war." Now he emphasized this formulation. Mitigation is only in the good-natured and peaceful appearance of Peskov, whose son, let me remind you, fought in Wagner at the same time. We are starting to see many things and many people in a new light - much better, to be honest. There is only one criterion right now: are you at war or not, and of course a clarification for special service men: if at war, then on whose side? But if you're not at war, then you're just misunderstanding something.

17
RussianAnon13569 17 points ago +17 / -0

That was really great speech. Like "WE WILL FUCKING NUKE WEST... and we will also modernise our post offices in villages"

3
RussianAnon13569 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be honest that's his biggest achievement - he took all that soyjack libtards and moved them fucking away from Russia.

3
RussianAnon13569 3 points ago +3 / -0

"The administration had clear instructions: to make sure that he did not die before the elections, and that he did not arrange a circus with horses. No one needed his death here," said the interlocutor surrounded by the head of the region.

10
RussianAnon13569 10 points ago +11 / -1

After the news of Alexei Navalny's death, Navalny's wife did not go to her children, to her parents, to Russia. She gave an anti-Putin speech at the Munich Security Conference right now. Is this normal?

1
RussianAnon13569 1 point ago +1 / -0

A little bit extra context, if i understood correctly to what he is refering:

  • it's still (data from 2022-2023) experimental "last reserve" option for terminal patients;
  • it's not vaccination in usual sense - it's personally (on our body cells) developed vaccine, using personal materials from patient;
  • since 1998 it has helped 900 people already;
  • currently around 60 people are receiving it at once;
  • 4 people are 24/7 creating it - 2 at a time, so it's kept 24/7.

Now they are very actively trying to move it from "last reserve" to frontline, so people can get help faster (they should have 3 courses of usual hormones therapy and chemoterapy, before allowed to be used something experimental).

https://www.niioncologii.ru/institute/pressa/index?id=9941 https://www.niioncologii.ru/patients/additional-information/anti-cancer https://mir24.tv/news/16580658/chem-krov-dolgozhitelei-otlichaetsya-ot-krovi-obychnyh-lyudei-mnenie-uchenyh

1
RussianAnon13569 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh sweet summer child comments on this video in YT from 10 years ago... mocking this activists, not knowing what will happen in a year.

"Activists like NATO - SERVANT OF THE ANTICHRIST, BANKS, VACCINES, CASHLESS PAYMENT 666."

And some really knowing what's happening:

"Sevastopol will become a hero twice, you will finish playing Yanukovych and co."

3
RussianAnon13569 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just a little context, as Russian, why we have problem with NATO in Ukraine - not in modern times, but some context before 2014.

Crimea is the base for Russian black sea fleet.

NATO was trying to push Russian black fleet out of there, make military training there (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jun/08/russia.nickpatonwalsh) and visit military ships there (protests against it in 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELNuYLaGV5s).

And Crimea population, being basically Russian population, was greatly against it, and had to stand on it's own against Yuschenko, until Yanukovich came to power.

If Ukraine joined NATO Russia would lose it's black sea fleet.

1
RussianAnon13569 1 point ago +1 / -0

So... does that means, that when Trump becomes president, he still can't pass bills for 2 years, because Senate will be not on his side? Or does it means that he can never do, because Senate election still don't change republicans who against Trump?

13
RussianAnon13569 13 points ago +13 / -0

Wow!!! You are right, thank you.

Just checked Tucker Carlson version on X an it has this (if you count from the the start of interview, not start of file).

Interesting detail - no such scene exist in Russian version of interview! (there are 2 version - one with Putin translated view from Tucker, and another with Tucker translated voice from RT https://t.me/rt_russian/189031).

In Russian version from RT we see Putin for the first time at 0:25 second mark, as he rubbing his hands after taking watches off.

So this 17 second mark Q drop is clearly intended by Tucker.