I agree. Those documentaries from Oliver Stone on Ukraine need to resurface right now, everything gets memory holed because of the amount of info we are hit with every day.
Additional backups in case all other backups fail: Myflixer & VHmovies. Be sure to use an ad blocker browser like Brave or something similar to avoid annoyances.
So these are sites you get to without having paid cable tv? I only have dumb tv, no cable or anything, so I am assuming I would down load the apps to PC, and because I am connected from PC to TV via hdmi cable, that I could used the apps. Is that right?
RealDebrid is the real deal and absolutely essential.
I prefer IPTV for $10/month for 15,000 channels over Kodi, but I have heard Kodi has come a long way. Even with 15,000 channels (worldwide) I still only use about 30 favorites. The best are the 24/7 movies/shows and then, of course, if you are into sports, you get live sports.
There are many services, most foreign based. The site I mentioned does reviews. They sometimes go down so only pay per month and not per year etc. Also, a VPN is important. Not just for security but to avoid buffering. I have found that connecting through the Netherlands is the fastest. But you can try different locations. I also disconnect and reconnect every once in a while so my ISP doesn't see me just sitting on one IP forever. Sometimes it feels like they throttle you if you stay on one too long. No idea if that is true.
My Real Debrids been having a hard time connecting, have to switch my NordVPN location constantly for RD to connect. Been this way for months now (firestick 4k max) w/BeeTV
VPNs have been very popular and having growing pains. Their profitability relies on high utilization of resources, which leads to dropped connections. You have to find a server with lower utilization.
Thank for posting this. Did not even know these interviews existed. Very interesting, and consistent with what we heard in TC interview.
Notes:
NATO was setup with there was an East vs West divide. This no longer exist. Why is NATA still in existence. My feeling is that they are always searching for an enemy to justify their existence.
Listen to Putin's speech @43:55. Look at that asshole smirking person who we shall not name @44:53
Putin nails it on the head at 53:41 when he says basically that if the U.S. instead of opposing Russia worked to build equitable relations, we would not need to spend huge sum of money on defense. (Military Industrial Complex come to mind?
I remember my thoughts upon hearing that the Soviet Union was ending. I was thinking what a great opportunity it would be for powers in the United States to help Russia build a great economy through partnership. Also though how bringing Russia a military alliance would ensure piece through Europe. I was still native as to believe that our countries leaders were benevolent.
Against this interview content, it is so easy to see the hand of the military industrial complex at work, to continually create enemies in order to justify their growth. The wars, conflicts in the world are not organic, but purposely created.
Realize, there is zero reason for him to remove is watch. I've never gone into a meeting and said "oh this watch is bothersome". This is comms +++
Watch.
Pen.
And, exactly 17 seconds into the meeting.
This is nothing short of astounding.
He may as well have said "By the way, Tucker, just to make clear, the Q operation your American media ridicules is as real as the chair you're sitting in. I'm with Trump all the way on the Plan to Save the World, and let me tell you this: Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming. Where We Go One, We Go All."
Edit: Video editing, rather than President Putin, likely designed the watch removal part to occur at 0:17...still pretty cool though
Keep in mind, this was Tucker's interview. Tucker and his team edited the entire thing for production. Tucker would not be caught off guard by Putin with 17 seconds. This would be coordinated.
Also, Putin telling the world that Tucker wanted to be CIA could have been edited out. Tucker left it there for a reason.
Maybe the CIA planned to use this as leverage against Tucker at some point in the future and by placing it out there early on, Tucker was able to take it off the board.
Tucker would not be caught off guard by Putin with 17 seconds. This would be coordinated.
I see no other way to read this except it seems to suggest Tucker's team coordinated with Putin to remove his watch, and somehow got him to do it at exactly the 17-second mark. IMHO that feels implausible.
My point is that the 17 second mark would be determined by Tucker's editing team. They are the ones producing the video of the interview. Had the interview started 1 second earlier or one second later, the watch would not line up at the 17 second mark.
I am not saying they asked Putin to take off his watch at 17 seconds, I am saying the video was edited for it to happen at that time mark.
And as has been stated, who the heck takes off their watch right at the beginning of an interview? Might that suggest the watch removal and placement at 17 seconds was coordinated?
You know, the entire MSM and Big Tech is coordinated with the cabal. They push coordinated propaganda every day. They almost always have a word of the day. Just a few days ago, they were all saying "chaos" in unison.
Why can't white hats coordinate with their communication teams too? It appears that Musk and Tucker are part of that team.
We often fall in love with feeling we are being spoken to when we see 17. But keep in mind, the white hats are trolling the shlit out of the deep state with this.
The white hats are basically saying, "We have Putin. We know what's really going on in Ukraine. We know of the bio labs. We know of the money laundering. We have it all. Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming."
I am confident Tucker came away with a lot more than just the interview that was aired. Sounds like he wanted to be a CIA officer in his past. Since the CIA is corrupt, maybe the white hats made him one of their own?
who the heck takes off their watch right at the beginning of an interview?
Someone mentioned they do that as a means of being able to calmly and quickly glance downward to check the time, so it doesn't look like you're constantly moving your sleeve to check your wristwatch, like you're bored. That also makes sense; but then again, why would President Putin need to constantly check the time during a set interview?
In the realm of body language - taking off your watch like that can signify that a person is intentionally making themselves available to be in that moment - with no regard to time, but instead exist within the exchange of thoughts and conversation.
"We have all the time we need." - in body language.
A modern version might be - intentionally turning off and setting aside your phone in plain view of someone you're talking to.
That said - as has been mentioned....
Timing placing that watch down at Exactly 17 seconds is impossible without an Edit creating that line up.
If there's no edit - then if the recording starts 1 second earlier or later, the line up is null.
If there's no edit - the person with the watch would have to understand exactly when the recording started - count to 17 second exactly - and time placing the watch at that second.
Good luck.
Editing that line up? Extremely easy to accomplish.
And I believe that is the angle to consider.
Edited by who?
And honestly - I'm not terribly interested in that answer. I'm just appreciating the line up and taking the hat tip as "message received" and thus encouragement.
I am confident Tucker came away with a lot more than just the interview that was aired. Sounds like he wanted to be a CIA officer in his past. Since the CIA is corrupt, maybe the white hats made him one of their own?
Tucker's Dad was VOA, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and an Ambassador. Deep into propaganda, public messaging and international relations, likely from a time before it became corrupted. I'd say it's more likely that Tucker was a White Hat since the day he was born than the white hats decided to scoop him up.
Thanks for the additional feedback. I like your line of thinking. I have no idea, but I do think that Tucker is playing a role and it seems to me like his trip was a perfect opportunity to do more than one thing.
Count out the letters in the alphabet and you will see!
Trump puts the number 17 into so many things and has done so for decades. For instance a recent news footage about his purchase of Mar-a-Lago talked about how they have 17 sets of china
Just checked Tucker Carlson version on X an it has this (if you count from the the start of interview, not start of file).
Interesting detail - no such scene exist in Russian version of interview! (there are 2 version - one with Putin translated view from Tucker, and another with Tucker translated voice from RT https://t.me/rt_russian/189031).
In Russian version from RT we see Putin for the first time at 0:25 second mark, as he rubbing his hands after taking watches off.
So this 17 second mark Q drop is clearly intended by Tucker.
Another anon took the shine off this a bit by pointing out Tucker's people could have edited the video so that the watch removal behavior occurred at 0:17.
Perhaps it's a Russian "thing"? Garry Kasparov always took off his watch at the start of a chess match. He only put it back on when he either won or when he knew the game was over...
If this is true, did Putin perfectly count 17 seconds after cameras started rolling to take the watch off? Is it somehow related to the red string on Tucker's wrist?
Completely unrelated to comms, but I love the idea of taking off your watch during an important discussion and placing it on the table as a sign of "giving someone your time."
The video was edited to the 17 seconds. Nobody counted. It was more of a “take your watch off almost instantly when the interview starts.
Then the editors at the kremlin (cause I guarantee you part of the agreement is they can edit it too) edited to 17 seconds as per directions.
The red string is his Jewish allegiance with Zionism handlers. But really it just means he is in the club. Tucker is both doing good, but also he’s a CIA puppet. Always has been. He never got on TV in the first place because he is an “awesome guy”
Taking off your watch and placing it on a table or lectern is common with people who are pacing themselves, it is a polite method of time management, I used to do a lot of corporate presentations, if I was allocated say 30 minutes, it would be impolite if I was constantly looking at my watch while speaking to the audience.
17 seconds after editing. It's unlikely he counted 17 perfectly. Whoever did the final cuts is the one who made sure the watch came off at the 17 second mark.
If he did end up counting 17 perfectly, I'd have to dole out some mass kuddos
It is an interesting and certainly plausible theory.
As a counter argument, I would say that there was no artificial time limit placed on the conversation (per Tucker in the prelog). And, Putin seemed to not give a fuck about time when giving his answers. For example, at the start he said, give me 30 seconds, maybe a minute, to explain. ...then he went on for over 30 minutes on the history of Russia and why it is relevant.
In an interview, you're always on camera. They set up a stationary camera on each subject for easy cuts. Sometimes you'll have a manned floater to provide an alternate viewpoint. Figure this way your traveling cameraman can operate 3 cameras.
Seeing him remove his watch absolutely caught my attention and it was a distraction to me and I thought about it for a second but I didn't make anything of it. This is an outstanding find!
Not sure if Q related, would be crazy if Putin was part of Q though.
Definitely thought it was weird when he took it off. When he did I got some James Bond spy tingles
I just finished watching that 2 hour interview. After watching "Biden" fumble and bumble his way over every word for the last 3 years, the contrast is striking. "Biden" can't give a 5-minute press conference without shitting his pants. Our "President" trying to go up against Putin would be like a toddler on a tricycle trying to race a Formula One race car. Can you imagine him trying to do a 2-hour interview with Tucker? They would have to stop it 10 minutes in.
Thank you! I thought it was odd that he took his watch off. Also wondered about the file he gave to Tucker and what it may really have been. Too thin to be a soccer ball. kek
That said, the rest is solid and I'd like to add the following:
Vlad's watch is set to 11:30 when he puts it down. Post 1130 is not relevant, but if you assume PM and 23:30... That talks about the Russian Collusion Hoax and the DNC connection:
The 17 second narrative I think is still in play because the actual interview part doesn't start until the graphic cut-over and Tucker's first actual question to Putin happening at 1:18 after a short intro narrative.
Putin starts to take his watch off at 1:35 as you noted which is 17 seconds after the intro graphic starting the actual interview at 1:18.
Yes it's not at the exact :17 marker of the whole official release of the interview, but for just the actual interview part itself, the taking off of the watch is exactly 17 seconds in.
She just wore that watch choker to the 66th Grammy awards. I read on conspiracies.win that it is set to the same time as the doomsday clock, 1 min to midnight. There’s definitely some sort of comms involved with that one. Just like the a white hats troll, so do the black hats.
” The vintage watch appears to be the Concord brand—one of the leading luxury timepiece brands in the first half of the last century. The brand supplied Cartier, Tiffany & Co., and Van Cleef & Arpels with timepieces. The watches were so nice that, during World War II in 1942, President Truman presented Concord pieces as gifts to both Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill.
Edited to add: There’s a bunch of MS articles about this necklace.
Usually when I see posts like this, with a bunch of arrows and timestamps, I think to myself… Well, this could be a lot of things. But this time, I don’t feel that way. You’re absolutely right. There’s no reason for him to take off his watch in the middle of an interview like that. Actually, you would think you’d want to keep it on, so you could refer to it as the interview was moving forward. Vladimir Putin is the president of Russia, he doesn’t have endless amount of time to give to a person for an interview. The fact that he took it off does mean something. Definitely means something.
Realize, there is zero reason for him to remove his watch. I've never gone into a meeting and said "oh this watch is bothersome". This is comms +++
I agree. Those documentaries from Oliver Stone on Ukraine need to resurface right now, everything gets memory holed because of the amount of info we are hit with every day.
Order up!
Ukraine on Fire: https://rumble.com/vwqe8o-ukraine-on-fire-oliver-stone-documentary.html
Revealing Ukraine: https://rumble.com/vx5rxg-revealing-ukraine-oliver-stone-documentary.html
You rock u/tenthousandspoons 👈🏻
BQQM
MVP
You forgot my order of bacon on the side 😎
MMmmmmm. Bacon.
We though it was raining when it's was bacon frying all the time.
https://rumble.com/v3t92p7-what-is-making-this-sound.html
Chris Christie is unavailable.
Here is the 4 part series The Putin Interviews on Paramount+.
https://www.paramountplus.com/shows/the-putin-interviews/
Thanks for this. As an FYI, there are many free movie apps that pull streams so you do not have to pay Hollywood a dime.
Cinema hd apk
Syncler
As one resource to consider, visit troypoint dot com for everything you need to know.
Oh thanks! I'll check it out!
I thought Cinema hd went down a few months back.
Is it still up and running?
No technology gets resurrected more often than free movie apps! 😂
The link I mentioned stays on top of what is working and what goes down.
Been using BeeTV since Cinema went down, flawless. FilmPlus as a backup jic
Additional backups in case all other backups fail: Myflixer & VHmovies. Be sure to use an ad blocker browser like Brave or something similar to avoid annoyances.
So these are sites you get to without having paid cable tv? I only have dumb tv, no cable or anything, so I am assuming I would down load the apps to PC, and because I am connected from PC to TV via hdmi cable, that I could used the apps. Is that right?
It did but it's back.
Kodi app + RealDebrid + The Crew (or many other add-ons) will reap tons of free TV, too. Pretty much anything with torrenting or paying for.
RealDebrid is the real deal and absolutely essential.
I prefer IPTV for $10/month for 15,000 channels over Kodi, but I have heard Kodi has come a long way. Even with 15,000 channels (worldwide) I still only use about 30 favorites. The best are the 24/7 movies/shows and then, of course, if you are into sports, you get live sports.
Who are you getting IPTV from?
There are many services, most foreign based. The site I mentioned does reviews. They sometimes go down so only pay per month and not per year etc. Also, a VPN is important. Not just for security but to avoid buffering. I have found that connecting through the Netherlands is the fastest. But you can try different locations. I also disconnect and reconnect every once in a while so my ISP doesn't see me just sitting on one IP forever. Sometimes it feels like they throttle you if you stay on one too long. No idea if that is true.
My Real Debrids been having a hard time connecting, have to switch my NordVPN location constantly for RD to connect. Been this way for months now (firestick 4k max) w/BeeTV
VPNs have been very popular and having growing pains. Their profitability relies on high utilization of resources, which leads to dropped connections. You have to find a server with lower utilization.
We dropped Nord and went to Surfshark.
I posted the four part interview the other day. Here they are...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oGiOVlpBDe4n/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nousk8W7dJOe/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hpcflv5sxYqi/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tNc34KfDT54E/
Thank for posting this. Did not even know these interviews existed. Very interesting, and consistent with what we heard in TC interview.
Notes:
NATO was setup with there was an East vs West divide. This no longer exist. Why is NATA still in existence. My feeling is that they are always searching for an enemy to justify their existence.
Listen to Putin's speech @43:55. Look at that asshole smirking person who we shall not name @44:53
Putin nails it on the head at 53:41 when he says basically that if the U.S. instead of opposing Russia worked to build equitable relations, we would not need to spend huge sum of money on defense. (Military Industrial Complex come to mind?
I remember my thoughts upon hearing that the Soviet Union was ending. I was thinking what a great opportunity it would be for powers in the United States to help Russia build a great economy through partnership. Also though how bringing Russia a military alliance would ensure piece through Europe. I was still native as to believe that our countries leaders were benevolent.
Against this interview content, it is so easy to see the hand of the military industrial complex at work, to continually create enemies in order to justify their growth. The wars, conflicts in the world are not organic, but purposely created.
Watch.
Pen.
And, exactly 17 seconds into the meeting.
This is nothing short of astounding.
He may as well have said "By the way, Tucker, just to make clear, the Q operation your American media ridicules is as real as the chair you're sitting in. I'm with Trump all the way on the Plan to Save the World, and let me tell you this: Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming. Where We Go One, We Go All."
Edit: Video editing, rather than President Putin, likely designed the watch removal part to occur at 0:17...still pretty cool though
Keep in mind, this was Tucker's interview. Tucker and his team edited the entire thing for production. Tucker would not be caught off guard by Putin with 17 seconds. This would be coordinated.
Also, Putin telling the world that Tucker wanted to be CIA could have been edited out. Tucker left it there for a reason.
Maybe the CIA planned to use this as leverage against Tucker at some point in the future and by placing it out there early on, Tucker was able to take it off the board.
Exactly right!
I don't think his editing team put in 17 seconds.
I think God did.
People of God will subconsciously follow his direction.
I think the same for most of the 17 we see.
I see no other way to read this except it seems to suggest Tucker's team coordinated with Putin to remove his watch, and somehow got him to do it at exactly the 17-second mark. IMHO that feels implausible.
My point is that the 17 second mark would be determined by Tucker's editing team. They are the ones producing the video of the interview. Had the interview started 1 second earlier or one second later, the watch would not line up at the 17 second mark.
I am not saying they asked Putin to take off his watch at 17 seconds, I am saying the video was edited for it to happen at that time mark.
And as has been stated, who the heck takes off their watch right at the beginning of an interview? Might that suggest the watch removal and placement at 17 seconds was coordinated?
You know, the entire MSM and Big Tech is coordinated with the cabal. They push coordinated propaganda every day. They almost always have a word of the day. Just a few days ago, they were all saying "chaos" in unison.
Why can't white hats coordinate with their communication teams too? It appears that Musk and Tucker are part of that team.
We often fall in love with feeling we are being spoken to when we see 17. But keep in mind, the white hats are trolling the shlit out of the deep state with this.
The white hats are basically saying, "We have Putin. We know what's really going on in Ukraine. We know of the bio labs. We know of the money laundering. We have it all. Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming."
I am confident Tucker came away with a lot more than just the interview that was aired. Sounds like he wanted to be a CIA officer in his past. Since the CIA is corrupt, maybe the white hats made him one of their own?
OK, makes sense
As to this part:
Someone mentioned they do that as a means of being able to calmly and quickly glance downward to check the time, so it doesn't look like you're constantly moving your sleeve to check your wristwatch, like you're bored. That also makes sense; but then again, why would President Putin need to constantly check the time during a set interview?
In the realm of body language - taking off your watch like that can signify that a person is intentionally making themselves available to be in that moment - with no regard to time, but instead exist within the exchange of thoughts and conversation.
"We have all the time we need." - in body language.
A modern version might be - intentionally turning off and setting aside your phone in plain view of someone you're talking to.
That said - as has been mentioned....
Timing placing that watch down at Exactly 17 seconds is impossible without an Edit creating that line up.
If there's no edit - then if the recording starts 1 second earlier or later, the line up is null.
If there's no edit - the person with the watch would have to understand exactly when the recording started - count to 17 second exactly - and time placing the watch at that second.
Good luck.
Editing that line up? Extremely easy to accomplish.
And I believe that is the angle to consider.
Edited by who?
And honestly - I'm not terribly interested in that answer. I'm just appreciating the line up and taking the hat tip as "message received" and thus encouragement.
Great thoughts, thanks u/CQVFEFE 👈🏻
Tucker's Dad was VOA, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and an Ambassador. Deep into propaganda, public messaging and international relations, likely from a time before it became corrupted. I'd say it's more likely that Tucker was a White Hat since the day he was born than the white hats decided to scoop him up.
Thanks for the additional feedback. I like your line of thinking. I have no idea, but I do think that Tucker is playing a role and it seems to me like his trip was a perfect opportunity to do more than one thing.
What's it called, tradecraft?
I'm new here, what does 17-second mark means?
Count out the letters in the alphabet and you will see!
Trump puts the number 17 into so many things and has done so for decades. For instance a recent news footage about his purchase of Mar-a-Lago talked about how they have 17 sets of china
Nice to have you aboard 🫡
Wow!!! You are right, thank you.
Just checked Tucker Carlson version on X an it has this (if you count from the the start of interview, not start of file).
Interesting detail - no such scene exist in Russian version of interview! (there are 2 version - one with Putin translated view from Tucker, and another with Tucker translated voice from RT https://t.me/rt_russian/189031).
In Russian version from RT we see Putin for the first time at 0:25 second mark, as he rubbing his hands after taking watches off.
So this 17 second mark Q drop is clearly intended by Tucker.
Thanks for sharing that observation. It does make it seem more intentional knowing that.
Welcome to the board u/RussianAnon13569
Добро пожаловать в великое пробуждение.
Спасибо!
Privyet!
Aything and everything that has to do with the number 17 is noted and celebrated
Because 17th letter of the alphabet
Tucker/CIA is not a new story, It has been talked about for decades.
Astounding, blatant Q confirmation.
Another anon took the shine off this a bit by pointing out Tucker's people could have edited the video so that the watch removal behavior occurred at 0:17.
That in itself is a Q proof, though
You gave me goosies
lol
Perhaps it's a Russian "thing"? Garry Kasparov always took off his watch at the start of a chess match. He only put it back on when he either won or when he knew the game was over...
CHECKMATE
https://qalerts.app/?n=523
And he made a big deal about it, gesturing and grabbing his wrist after it was off. Def something there
First time I knew FOR SURE Putin is "in on it" with respect to the Q Team.
If this is true, did Putin perfectly count 17 seconds after cameras started rolling to take the watch off? Is it somehow related to the red string on Tucker's wrist?
Completely unrelated to comms, but I love the idea of taking off your watch during an important discussion and placing it on the table as a sign of "giving someone your time."
The more I see of Putin the more I like him.
The video was edited to the 17 seconds. Nobody counted. It was more of a “take your watch off almost instantly when the interview starts.
Then the editors at the kremlin (cause I guarantee you part of the agreement is they can edit it too) edited to 17 seconds as per directions.
The red string is his Jewish allegiance with Zionism handlers. But really it just means he is in the club. Tucker is both doing good, but also he’s a CIA puppet. Always has been. He never got on TV in the first place because he is an “awesome guy”
That's how I interpreted it and thought it was pure class.
maybe he was given a signal off camera
Maybe the watch has a second hand...easy peasy :)
Taking off your watch and placing it on a table or lectern is common with people who are pacing themselves, it is a polite method of time management, I used to do a lot of corporate presentations, if I was allocated say 30 minutes, it would be impolite if I was constantly looking at my watch while speaking to the audience.
at 17 seconds in !?!
17 seconds after editing. It's unlikely he counted 17 perfectly. Whoever did the final cuts is the one who made sure the watch came off at the 17 second mark.
If he did end up counting 17 perfectly, I'd have to dole out some mass kuddos
It is an interesting and certainly plausible theory.
As a counter argument, I would say that there was no artificial time limit placed on the conversation (per Tucker in the prelog). And, Putin seemed to not give a fuck about time when giving his answers. For example, at the start he said, give me 30 seconds, maybe a minute, to explain. ...then he went on for over 30 minutes on the history of Russia and why it is relevant.
he waited until he was on camera. wish we could have a close up of his watch, if it's the same one then there can be no doubt on comms.
17 seconds confirms it's comms
In an interview, you're always on camera. They set up a stationary camera on each subject for easy cuts. Sometimes you'll have a manned floater to provide an alternate viewpoint. Figure this way your traveling cameraman can operate 3 cameras.
That makes sense,...but then again why would President Putin feel the NEED to constantly look at his watch?
I would agree but the 45 minute history lesson that followed the watch removal disagrees
П is 17th letter of Russian alphabet.
And it's the first letter in Putin
... and I read that with a Russian accent. Well played.
u/#MindBlown
Yeah, no doubt 😎👍🏼
Seeing him remove his watch absolutely caught my attention and it was a distraction to me and I thought about it for a second but I didn't make anything of it. This is an outstanding find!
Link here. https://twitter.com/RealAF_Patriot/status/1755841769072107724
https://qalerts.pub/?n=2647
Hunter Biden level of hopium. My erection may last more than 24hrs with this one.
Seek immediate medical help after 4 hours.
This
https://files.catbox.moe/tt0lg3.jpeg
Freedom boner in the house!
u/#q2647
KGB to Putin - Have you seen GAW? Those anons were right on it
Putin - As Trump predicted
Would also be interesting to know what time it was in Russia when Putin took off his watch - wonder if time would match the time on the Q watch.
Wow was just thinking that. 👍🏼
And Now we know! This answers my Question! Excellent find!! ⌚💥
Not sure if Q related, would be crazy if Putin was part of Q though.
Definitely thought it was weird when he took it off. When he did I got some James Bond spy tingles
There is no doubt in my mind that Putin is aware of and co-operates with the plan.
He told us he wanted to join NATO. Of course, I'm convinced he is working with white hats.
Vlad does not need to be a part of Q. Remember the Soccer Ball?
Watch the video and tell me if these two men have made a pact. It seems to me, they have a little inside joke together ...
Compare his body language with: Oliver Stone vs Tucker, his performances with other heads of state like china with Trump.
I just finished watching that 2 hour interview. After watching "Biden" fumble and bumble his way over every word for the last 3 years, the contrast is striking. "Biden" can't give a 5-minute press conference without shitting his pants. Our "President" trying to go up against Putin would be like a toddler on a tricycle trying to race a Formula One race car. Can you imagine him trying to do a 2-hour interview with Tucker? They would have to stop it 10 minutes in.
Yes, Biden would remove his depends and place it on the table.
we're witnessing levels of autism that shouldn't even be possible!
Thank you! I thought it was odd that he took his watch off. Also wondered about the file he gave to Tucker and what it may really have been. Too thin to be a soccer ball. kek
It doesn't get more clear than this.
I wonder if the exact moment he removed his watch would be a time match for the time shown on the Q watch...
There were 2 watches in the Q drops:3:15, and 3:42. Moscow is 8 hours ahead of New York
Was there a camera in the watch?
Good catch! I found this incredibly odd and was wondering if there was some significance to it.
nice catch!
O…M…G…. No way to see this other than Q lens.
Is Putin left handed? Why is he wearing his watch on his right wrist?
I'm right handed and have always worn mine on my right, it always felt more natural.
Isn’t it common to not wear your watch on your dominant wrist?
I don't (when I do wear a watch).
But I'm not sure what response you'll get asking the uncommon crew that gathers here what "common" actually is!
It's personal preference, and also related to type of work you do.
I think Putin is left-handed, and everyone I know that’s left-handed wears a watch on their right wrist.
If he is ...as am I, wearing such watches on the right hand side helps with writing with a pen, which I also do a lot.
If you watch YT version, the interview starts at 1:19, Putin starts to take off the watch at 1:36.
I like to keep things honest, lest we go down rabbit holes that lead to nowhere or we lose credibility when needed.
On the official release of the Tucker interview, the watch comes off at 1m:35s. I see no case for the 17s part.
That said, the rest is solid and I'd like to add the following:
u/#q2330
The 17 second narrative I think is still in play because the actual interview part doesn't start until the graphic cut-over and Tucker's first actual question to Putin happening at 1:18 after a short intro narrative.
Putin starts to take his watch off at 1:35 as you noted which is 17 seconds after the intro graphic starting the actual interview at 1:18.
Yes it's not at the exact :17 marker of the whole official release of the interview, but for just the actual interview part itself, the taking off of the watch is exactly 17 seconds in.
11:30 puts it almost exactly between the two Q watches. 3:15 and 3:42.
Taylor Swift is supposed to be wearing a watch necklace to the Superb Owl, it's the one that he handler said is set to 12 midnight.
She just wore that watch choker to the 66th Grammy awards. I read on conspiracies.win that it is set to the same time as the doomsday clock, 1 min to midnight. There’s definitely some sort of comms involved with that one. Just like the a white hats troll, so do the black hats.
” The vintage watch appears to be the Concord brand—one of the leading luxury timepiece brands in the first half of the last century. The brand supplied Cartier, Tiffany & Co., and Van Cleef & Arpels with timepieces. The watches were so nice that, during World War II in 1942, President Truman presented Concord pieces as gifts to both Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill.
Edited to add: There’s a bunch of MS articles about this necklace.
Yeah, that caught my eye right away!
Usually when I see posts like this, with a bunch of arrows and timestamps, I think to myself… Well, this could be a lot of things. But this time, I don’t feel that way. You’re absolutely right. There’s no reason for him to take off his watch in the middle of an interview like that. Actually, you would think you’d want to keep it on, so you could refer to it as the interview was moving forward. Vladimir Putin is the president of Russia, he doesn’t have endless amount of time to give to a person for an interview. The fact that he took it off does mean something. Definitely means something.
Boom!
These are the posts that keep me coming back.
Jfc. Just relax lmao