2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

I LOL'ed

4
Sadness 4 points ago +4 / -0

This woman and word salad. It's like watching a slow car-crash-cringe.

She doesn't believe censorship took place. Josh's jaw drops.

Then she starts arscovering.

2
Sadness 2 points ago +2 / -0

8 of swords (sort of like spears)?

The Eight of Swords shows a woman bound and blindfolded. Eight swords surround her, seemingly trapping her in place, a symbol of the limiting thoughts, beliefs and mindset that prevent her from moving forward in her life.

NOTE: The Tarot card meaning description is based on the Rider Waite cards.

https://biddytarot.com/tarot-card-meanings/minor-arcana/suit-of-swords/eight-of-swords/

3
Sadness 3 points ago +4 / -1

🎵One of these lobes is not like the other...🎵

5
Sadness 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh it's Vice president Kamal Trump.

6
Sadness 6 points ago +6 / -0

He has a massive cowlick that refuses to comply, making bristly bits stick up on the crown, and forelocks that wanna go forwards, not backwards.

Prolly a bit too short on top TBH. The hair needs a little length on cowlicks so that the weight can pull it where it needs to be, with some product. Also, someone had the wrong guide on the clippers and chunked a bit out on his temple. It looks a bit mangey.

6
Sadness 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah that was pretty OBVIO. No wonder those people look hunted and afraid.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

leading several X users to suggest that Musk wants it to be illegal for brands to refuse to advertise on X.

No, he is suggesting it is illegal to conspire against a social media company by collectively boy-cotting their advertising service in an attempt to get rid of 'unacceptable users', like Trump. As far as X is concerned, Trump brings eyes. So that must be good then.

In the end the ludicrous bunch had to come crawling back anyway, but it did cause some financial hurt to X when the Lib advertisers all fled due to pressure from the GARM conglomerate. And who are those clowns anyway? Oh just a bunch of competing oligarchs, with a political agenda. It could be argued that it is unfair business practice to externally limit X revenue, given that in an open society anyone can advertise, and they should be able to do it where they want, without being told to not advertise by a third party, because of TDS.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh no, you burst my bubble. I did do a search and the title did not come up. So not REALLY a dupe.

ANyways, post is removed now.

4
Sadness 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just posted it and the jannies removed it. I did search it, so I blame the search function (or my fat fingers).

Anyway. HAha.

u/#haha

3
Sadness 3 points ago +3 / -0

But the fact checker. You bastards aren't listening to the fact checkers.

9
Sadness 9 points ago +9 / -0

Excellent and based.

How do you get you flair to say something other than the proscribed ones?

6
Sadness 6 points ago +6 / -0

Won't go anywhere.

She is trying to get some attention, as a 'serious representative', IMO

Also projection. Which Judge refused to recuse himself recently? Oh yeah.

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

My question is: Why 128?

Adds up to 11 - the crazy number. Gekkegetal.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›