3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q said disinformation is necessary.

Juan could be guessing, sure, but he could just as well be in the know and him date-fagging doesn't really say much either way. Who knows.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem with your question is it is based off of a bunch of made up assumptions. For all you know, dude went to Russia and met her in person before being separated by totalitarian vaccine bullshit.

Whether or not he is memeing, finding a woman in another country is not automatically "hurr durr paid for wife!!!"

6
SpaceManBob 6 points ago +6 / -0

The final nail in the coffin for that shit, at least to anyone with a functioning brain, was Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.

5
SpaceManBob 5 points ago +5 / -0

I guess I'm to the point where I have hope, but not in anything specific, if that makes sense.

Same here, fren. I refuse to lose hope, but I can't say I'm particularly convinced of, or excited for, any particular'habbening'. When it happens, it happens. Until then hope is the way :)

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are you denying, exactly? Someone else's personal experience in their own town? What are you, their neighbor lol

9
SpaceManBob 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well... not exactly:

Sophie, who is “queer until proven straight,” is outspoken about human rights on her social media platforms. She covers a plethora of current events, including the Queer Capitol March and Texas legislation.

“I have no other choice but to be political. life is depending on it,” reads her Instagram bio. “unwilling to die for the dow. abortion advocate.”

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just realized it but mine too kek

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Translation: "Goodbye, Twitter. We hate free speech and feel superior to the peons and feel that we deserve special treatment with regard to getting a blue check without paying like everyone else. In the event we want to plug a different platform that conforms to these ideals, we will immediately return to grovel for followers. Thank you!"

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

The more and deeper I look and think about the basis for a lot of absurd positions people hold today, the more I see "Yea, hath God said?".

There's truly nothing new under the sun.

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Men and women are very different. Not just physically, either.

And to discount the physical differences as a result of them being minor, as you'd expect of two members of the same species might I add, is a worthless distinction.

When working within the frame of "human" we are very physically different. Just because we could work within the frame of "all species of all variations and differences" doesn't change that. And we should be working within the "human" frame, since that is what we are and what we are comparing/contrasting.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is your question exactly?

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

The real question is, did you look into the links provided earlier, or did you just ignore them and make yourself into a hypocrite?

6
SpaceManBob 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think limiting His mission to one thing or another is extremely near-sighted. Jesus' mission was all things. To break us free from the bondage of sin and end it once and for all.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump was a businessman. He was what he had to be to not get fucked over.

Not to mention the potential long term aspect of the plan.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

He says while starting an argument on a post about the goobermint trying to justify banning people from investing or otherwise using crypto.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dinosaurs are real. Evolution is fake and gay. Billions of years is fake and gay.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I am aware. Hence why I said I think people's definition of what constitutes "proof" is too narrow. Hence my original statement.

Again, I know what people mean and don't disagree with really anything you have said. I just don't think "proof" is as narrow as you and other people make it out to be. In my opinion, the common view of "proof" is overly naturalistic and materialistic and discounts other, perfectly valid modes of thinking that can be used to come to rational, valid conclusions on events that have taken place, among other things.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›