The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow fringes. That is your WARNING that you are entering into a foreign jurisdiction, the same as if you are stepping onto foreign soil and you will be under the jurisdiction of THAT flag. The flag with the gold or yellow fringe has no constitution, no laws, and no rules of any court, and is not recognized by any nation on this earth, and is foreign to you and the United States of America.
Those of us who believe that the Yellow Fringed Flag is the ‘Law of Admiralty’ Flag will know all about this. For the rest of us, this will be a shocking new disclosure. President, Dwight David Eisenhower signed Executive Order No.10834 on August 21, 1959 and had printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to the law, stated that: “A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides.”
The American people were allowed to believe that it was just a decoration but its not. When you see a flag that resembles a regular US flag with YELLOW FRINGE border on the edges, it means that you are in a special place. A place that should not have any jurisdiction over you if you are a normal citizen. The President of the United States designates this difference from the regular flag, by executive order such as Ike did, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military he makes it so. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy.
Government officials and judges often refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the official flag of the United States as defined in the constitution – which has NO fringe. In 1933 President Theodore Roosevelt described that the admiralty, maritime or administration display of the flag is established by the presence of “gold fringe, gold braid, gold eagle, gold spear, or gold ball atop the flag pole.” In 1979 these standards were set down in Army regulations as part of the War Powers Act. By submitting a plea to this type of court, you are silently assenting, or agreeing, that this court has jurisdiction over you. That is how the display of the fringed-flags allows our freedoms to be taken away. Be advised.
This is a hell of a stretch. Gold decoration on the US flag has been used many times where it was clearly not attached to any military organization. And gold fringe is not the same as a yellow border on the flag. It's an additional decoration added to the normal national flag.
You can buy these flags on Amazon. The fringe means nothing other than an extravagant decoration of the standard US flag. These posts trying to read something into a decorative fringe just make me lol. Search for fringed US flag on any shopping site and you'll find lots of options to purchase. Hell, half the flags in my neighborhood are fringed flags.
I see your pov, but just consider this. In the military we have very strict rules for the colors. Not everyone in the military really cares that much about it, but strict rules do exist. There are many other ways a flag could be decorated, just look at the thin blue line. But the gold fringe is the only decoration we are authorized (and sometimes required) to use.
That being said, there are flags we use that have the fringe and some that don’t. I won’t even pretend to tell you what the difference is, but I will tell you that we would never carry anything other than the national standard, with or without gold fringe.what this tells me is that there was/is a reason for the gold fringe. Maybe it truly was pure decoration. But why did we need to decorate it in the first place? Why aren’t we allowed to decorate it in any other way? Just something to ponder.
I can also buy a Norwegian flag on Amazon. Does that mean its just a regular USA flag with colors arranged in a different pattern for decoration or is it different because it is Norwegian?
If the Constitution, represented by the flag, and the law of the flag title 4: 1,2,3 specifically says to add nothing and put nothing above the flag, and yet, certain people do it, all the while you are noticing the destruction of the Constitution:
What then could be the reason to alter the flag? What then does.it signal in terms of contract? Has the contract been altered?
Nothing is coincidental, despite the fact that these changes are presented as something they want you to belief.
Snipe hunting. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and its provisions prevail absolutely. No Executive Order can legally revoke our rights and privileges under the constitution. I concede that corrupt officials will cheerfully transgress the Constitution, but they do so committing sedition or treason, depending on circumstances. The idea that we willingly surrender our rights depending on what flag is on display is nonsense.
That's magical thinking. Nothing can compel me to give up my rights, and any fraudulent inducement is voided by fraud. No "jurisdiction" supervenes over the Constitution, which is "the supreme law of the land." This is the same superstition behind the idea that a vampire can't enter your house unless you invite him.
Contract law does not supervene over the Constitution. Period. My birth certificate "links" me only to Whatcom County in the state of Washington, which establishes my birthright as a citizen. There are no "corporate" jurisdictions. You are in fear of an invisible monster. We have more to fear from our elected representatives. And if they are not elected fairly, we have only ourselves to blame and need to step up to the need for house-cleaning. We are inheriting the problem of generations of political complacence. In my experience (union politics), there is far too much carping and relying on the next guy to do the hard work of removing corruption, instead of rolling up sleeves and getting involved.
Whatcom County again is linked to D.C. which again is linked to crown corp in City Of London.
You can try to deny the existence of the Unholy Trinity (D.C., City of London and Vatican City), but it is still real none the less.
Just because I know about this and warn you about that reality, does not make me afraid of it. It is an enemy, just like many other things and it is alpha and omega to know your enemy.
Truth shall set you free, so if you LIE and say you are a legal dead person/fiction linked to the birth certificate, then you will pay the cost.
Your "ID" is your DNA amongst other (internal) and not some serial number hooked up to a registered NAME made by the Fed (external).
You don't give me a reason to read anything. All we have as supreme law is the Constitution. I notice you do not dispute that, as well you cannot. Apparently you think that something can be above it. There is always force majeure, but that is not law.
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and its provisions prevail absolutely. No Executive Order can legally revoke our rights and privileges under the constitution. I concede that corrupt officials will cheerfully transgress the Constitution, but they do so committing sedition or treason, depending on circumstances. The idea that we willingly surrender our rights depending on what flag is on display is nonsense.
The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow fringes. That is your WARNING that you are entering into a foreign jurisdiction, the same as if you are stepping onto foreign soil and you will be under the jurisdiction of THAT flag. The flag with the gold or yellow fringe has no constitution, no laws, and no rules of any court, and is not recognized by any nation on this earth, and is foreign to you and the United States of America.
Those of us who believe that the Yellow Fringed Flag is the ‘Law of Admiralty’ Flag will know all about this. For the rest of us, this will be a shocking new disclosure. President, Dwight David Eisenhower signed Executive Order No.10834 on August 21, 1959 and had printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to the law, stated that: “A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides.”
The American people were allowed to believe that it was just a decoration but its not. When you see a flag that resembles a regular US flag with YELLOW FRINGE border on the edges, it means that you are in a special place. A place that should not have any jurisdiction over you if you are a normal citizen. The President of the United States designates this difference from the regular flag, by executive order such as Ike did, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military he makes it so. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy. Government officials and judges often refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the official flag of the United States as defined in the constitution – which has NO fringe. In 1933 President Theodore Roosevelt described that the admiralty, maritime or administration display of the flag is established by the presence of “gold fringe, gold braid, gold eagle, gold spear, or gold ball atop the flag pole.” In 1979 these standards were set down in Army regulations as part of the War Powers Act. By submitting a plea to this type of court, you are silently assenting, or agreeing, that this court has jurisdiction over you. That is how the display of the fringed-flags allows our freedoms to be taken away. Be advised.
How do you reconcile this with the fact that Trump has used gold fringed flags at his rallies, even after 2020?
Because the deeper you dig the clearer it becomes that the fringe is just decoration?
My take is that he does not realize the depths of corruption even to this day.
Especially act of 1871.
I see no reference to gold fringe in EO 10834
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/10834.html
https://archives.federalregister.gov/issue_slice/1959/8/25/6865-6867.pdf#page=1
Is this what “false flag” really means in the posts? 🤔
Theodore Roosevelt died 1/6/1919. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was president in 1933.
Now we need a shot of the courtroom flag, that trump was in.
This is a hell of a stretch. Gold decoration on the US flag has been used many times where it was clearly not attached to any military organization. And gold fringe is not the same as a yellow border on the flag. It's an additional decoration added to the normal national flag.
Why is it added. Which other flags are decorated in this fashion?
You can buy these flags on Amazon. The fringe means nothing other than an extravagant decoration of the standard US flag. These posts trying to read something into a decorative fringe just make me lol. Search for fringed US flag on any shopping site and you'll find lots of options to purchase. Hell, half the flags in my neighborhood are fringed flags.
Therefore it has no meaning?
Bingo. It's just decoration that may or may not be used by whoever's buying the flags that day. Zero symbolic meaning, no matter how hard we try.
Why does not anyone else decorate any other flag in this manner?
"anyone else" - who? I have seen this sort of fringe on many types of flags, like state flags or flags for other countries. It's decoration.
Could you show me one?
I see your pov, but just consider this. In the military we have very strict rules for the colors. Not everyone in the military really cares that much about it, but strict rules do exist. There are many other ways a flag could be decorated, just look at the thin blue line. But the gold fringe is the only decoration we are authorized (and sometimes required) to use.
That being said, there are flags we use that have the fringe and some that don’t. I won’t even pretend to tell you what the difference is, but I will tell you that we would never carry anything other than the national standard, with or without gold fringe.what this tells me is that there was/is a reason for the gold fringe. Maybe it truly was pure decoration. But why did we need to decorate it in the first place? Why aren’t we allowed to decorate it in any other way? Just something to ponder.
I can also buy a Norwegian flag on Amazon. Does that mean its just a regular USA flag with colors arranged in a different pattern for decoration or is it different because it is Norwegian?
Then ask yourself.
If the Constitution, represented by the flag, and the law of the flag title 4: 1,2,3 specifically says to add nothing and put nothing above the flag, and yet, certain people do it, all the while you are noticing the destruction of the Constitution: What then could be the reason to alter the flag? What then does.it signal in terms of contract? Has the contract been altered?
Nothing is coincidental, despite the fact that these changes are presented as something they want you to belief.
Lots of things are coincidental.
Nice dodge.
You are not the sole arbiter of symbolism, and you never will be, no matter how hard you try.
cohencidental .... yes. But in politics nothing is co-incidental.
Nonsense.
He chose the wrong Roosevelt.
Snipe hunting. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and its provisions prevail absolutely. No Executive Order can legally revoke our rights and privileges under the constitution. I concede that corrupt officials will cheerfully transgress the Constitution, but they do so committing sedition or treason, depending on circumstances. The idea that we willingly surrender our rights depending on what flag is on display is nonsense.
If you use a legal name in writing or verbally, you enter into contract with that jurisdiction.
Doing so is in reality to surrender your rights in exchange of privileges.
That's magical thinking. Nothing can compel me to give up my rights, and any fraudulent inducement is voided by fraud. No "jurisdiction" supervenes over the Constitution, which is "the supreme law of the land." This is the same superstition behind the idea that a vampire can't enter your house unless you invite him.
Fringed flag and contract law say otherwise. You probably have a birth certificate linking you to the FED just like 100% of other US citizens.
Licence to drive, or any other licence is linked to that birth certificate person fraud putting out in a corporate jurisdiction.
Use a legal name, play the legal game.
Contract law does not supervene over the Constitution. Period. My birth certificate "links" me only to Whatcom County in the state of Washington, which establishes my birthright as a citizen. There are no "corporate" jurisdictions. You are in fear of an invisible monster. We have more to fear from our elected representatives. And if they are not elected fairly, we have only ourselves to blame and need to step up to the need for house-cleaning. We are inheriting the problem of generations of political complacence. In my experience (union politics), there is far too much carping and relying on the next guy to do the hard work of removing corruption, instead of rolling up sleeves and getting involved.
Whatcom County again is linked to D.C. which again is linked to crown corp in City Of London.
You can try to deny the existence of the Unholy Trinity (D.C., City of London and Vatican City), but it is still real none the less.
Just because I know about this and warn you about that reality, does not make me afraid of it. It is an enemy, just like many other things and it is alpha and omega to know your enemy.
Truth shall set you free, so if you LIE and say you are a legal dead person/fiction linked to the birth certificate, then you will pay the cost.
Your "ID" is your DNA amongst other (internal) and not some serial number hooked up to a registered NAME made by the Fed (external).
I see you cannot refute the fact that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Thank you.
Don't need to. But you are not standing your ground when using legal name. You are lost at sea in admiralty law instead. Jurisdictions matter.
Read these and get back to me. Im keeping an open mind on this issue.
https://www.dtss.us/banking-history.html
https://www.dtss.us/four-us-constitutions.html
You don't give me a reason to read anything. All we have as supreme law is the Constitution. I notice you do not dispute that, as well you cannot. Apparently you think that something can be above it. There is always force majeure, but that is not law.
Well stated
I would love to see a court case concerning civilians where fringe on a flag had any sort of impact on the case.
You can see the gold fringes in some of obamas speeches so ...not sure it matters.
Also other countries use it
That's irrelevant. It refers to jurisdiction. It means military/admiralty jurisdiction. The law of the sea vs the law of the land (Constitution).
Oh yeah thats why it's been in presidential speeches for decades now? K
Yeah but gold is going through the roof. I wonder if someone will come out with a flag that has bitcoin instead of gold along the fringe. :P