13
TSearch 13 points ago +13 / -0

He’s revealing this Big Pharma pricing “approach” is actually a massive money laundering scheme. They take our money and distribute it to powerful people around the world.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I had been going back and forth on whether I wanted to start raising pigs again. Now I know I will.

I also have to say, most people raising pigs on pasture don’t give antibiotics.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point. It’s possible something like this was done to reach the low information crowd. Or, put a shot across someone’s bow. If that turns out to be the case, it was pretty unselfish of O’Keefe to play the role.

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Damn!

My observation is some of the major grocery stores definitely have a pricing strategy to gouge wherever possible. Some others seem to have a more simple pricing strategy where they tack a desired margin onto what they pay.

I’m pretty sure Aldi is an example of a chain that just tacks on a margin.

10
TSearch 10 points ago +10 / -0

I wonder why eggs aren’t on the list? Maybe because the drop is triple digits? I saw eggs for $2.20 a dozen this week. Granted it was for like a seven dozen box, but a few months ago the price on that box was over double.

7
TSearch 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even if you don’t trust Bondi, it still feels like O’Keefe jumped the shark on this. The dude was running around acting like he was going to be suicided over something Bondi was comfortable saying in a very public place.

Maybe there is something else going on here, but I think his credibility will take a very big hit for now. No matter what you believe, this was as big a nothing burger as the binders POTUS gave the “influencers” in the Oval Office.

7
TSearch 7 points ago +7 / -0

Maybe I’m naive, but I don’t think any of these nominations are made without tremendous forethought and a good idea of how they will play out. Each person is nominated to do something or expose something, even if they don’t know it.

I wouldn’t be commenting on a Q board for the last five years if I thought POTUS was flying blind and appointing people who will block the Great Awakening. I think he has a core team behind him that is war gaming every move.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know President Trump is a master at trolling, but I didn’t think his trolling on this was directed at foreign targets. I thought he was calling out a tactic of the American left to downplay anything that stirs a sense of patriotism. He said something to the effect “we never celebrate anything.”

I guess I also wouldn’t underestimate the possibility he is doing this to raise awareness about World War 2, to generations who are oblivious to history. Every time someone pushes back with historical perspective people are getting an education.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m not sure if Musk was hinting these videos could be scanned by a software program and he’s willing to help? Or, was he hinting that he is helping and AI is being used to identify and catalog people and their crimes? He had a brief smirk toward the end when he said what they really need are people who are good with computers.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

As I watch this Cabinet work, I’ve been wondering if, at least some of them, might be directly supported by the Q team? Granted, they might just see it as Military Intelligence providing them information and guidance.

This was the first thing that came to mind when RFK Jr. confidently announced we would know the cause of autism by September. Maybe I have an overly fertile imagination, but my immediate reaction was he has already been briefed on the cause, and was given the task of making the “discovery” appear organic.

So, maybe, in a way RFK Jr. is being “controlled” by a team of good guys who are guiding him through the most productive path to reveal and solve many of these health issues.

As much as it frustrates me to think that it’s necessary to go through a process to make it look like these things are discovered independently, I can see a plausible reason why it is necessary.

Big Pharma has buried knowledge and cures under intellectual property protections because they would crush their profits. In the upside down world of D.C. there would be a rush to impeach and prosecute Trump officials for illegal spying while aiding Big Pharma in denying everything.

If researchers are pointed in the right direction and make the discovery independently, Big Pharma and their political allies can’t do anything about it.

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think we should consider another possibility. Rick Scott and Pam Bondi charged and tried Zimmerman to protect Florida and its Stand Your Ground Laws.

Eric Holder was making a lot of noise about Stand Your Ground Laws in general. He saw the Zimmerman case as a chance to file federal charges and stage a show trial. The goal wasn’t just to convict Zimmerman, but also attempt to challenge Stand Your Ground.

The evidence presented in the Florida trial led to Zimmerman’s acquittal and cut off Holder’s ability to bring Federal charges. In the end we can still say Zimmerman was wrongfully charged, but the intent was nowhere near as nefarious as some believe.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t know why, but this made the lyrics, “that’s me in the corner, that’s me in the spotlight, losing my religion,” pop into my head.

This really seems below O’Keefe’s standards, almost like he’s losing his religion.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

You’re entitled to your interpretation.

My interpretation is Patel was smart enough to not offer his personal opinion. And, as you said in another response, they’ve destroyed the evidence, so all he would have is an unsubstantiated opinion.

I also wonder if he was being careful to avoid being accused of perjury again? But, I’m not going to dig to see if he has been asked that question before.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

These politicians are intentionally conflating the precepts of criminal law with administrative law. And, Immigration Laws are Administrative Laws.

The enforcement and adjudication of Administrative Laws rests within the Executive Branch. Due process in Administrative Cases are nowhere near as stringent as criminal cases.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is there any sauce to support this meme?

Maybe he said it and I just don’t remember, that’s why everything is better with sauce.

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is incredible to me that no neighboring Arab country is offering to evacuate civilians from Gaza. Apparently, not even the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

I get that absorbing 2 million people would be daunting, but some countries in the region are literally swimming in money. And, some bring in millions of foreign workers that they have no issue housing.

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Way before I was aware of Q, Posobeic was closely associated with Alex Jones. Somewhere in the early days of Q, Posobeic did an “exposé” claiming he knew the creator of Q and that Q was nothing more than a larp.

As for Posobeic being a friend of POTUS, I’m not sure that’s the case. I see it more as President Trump using Posobeic to disseminate information. The best example I can give is to contrast Posobeic with John Rich. I don’t think Jack Posobeic is getting calls and text from POTUS like John Rich does. But, that’s just my take.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interesting take. How does Comer fit into your analysis? He was basically discrediting Bondi and Patel. Maybe not so much as Cabal assets, more like people easily duped by the Cabal.

She had a pretty interesting reaction to the reporter’s question about what Comer said. Her initial response was a little gasp, which seemed to communicate Comer knew full well what he was saying was wrong and she was taken aback that he said it.

17
TSearch 17 points ago +17 / -0

I’m confused. Didn’t Q out Alex Jones as a Mossad asset? I can’t find the specific drop.

So O'Keefe is engaging a Mossad asset to disseminate the claim someone in the Trump Administration is trying to cover up Mossad’s Epstein Operation? Does that seem confusing to anyone else?

9
TSearch 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just a weird thought, maybe he’s saying this to play mind games with the Senate. Then, when President Trump chooses someone else the Senate is less likely to push back on that nominee.

And, I can’t rule out General Flynn is playing an angle he believes will increase his annual revenue. That’s what people engaged in consulting and public speaking do. It doesn’t necessarily make them good or bad, it just means they are self promoters.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›