1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

It won’t happen. Their leaders have surrendered. Both Biden and Harris have publicly accepted the results.

Absent an external push the average Democrat voter will sit at home and proclaim “somebody should do something!”

The levers for inciting public unrest have been neutralized. There was no vow to battle this out in court, no cry that we need to keep counting, no ability to complain about winning the popular vote. The concession speech was an act of surrender by an occupying force.

11
TSearch 11 points ago +11 / -0

What’s strange is the 2024 election results look like 2020 without the late night ballot drops. And, that means the vote turnout wasn’t too big to rig.

Maybe too big to rig meant something else?

When I think about how many times President Trump posted cease and desist election rigging warnings. How many times he made the statement our country is occupied territory. My over active imagination thinks the election riggers were caught and stopped.

The election safeguarding measures are the thing that was too big for the riggers to be successful. The reason it feels strange is because it was primarily done quietly in the background.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

How many times did President Trump make a cease and desist statement about attempts to rig the election?

Looking at the fact the results themselves weren’t too big to rig, it has me thinking too big to rig wasn’t about a massive turnout, it was about a big operation to cut off attempts to rig the election. I’m thinking the calls were made last night because every angle of election rigging was covered.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Last night Wendy Rogers was claiming the votes already counted were from deep blue precincts. She claimed the outstanding votes should be breaking 2 to 1 for Kari Lake. But, I think I’ve heard that story before in Arizona.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dude will be in the minority come January 3rd, he won’t have the votes to block any thing.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I can’t figure out is how they blocked the cheating this year. Or, at least substantially blocked it. As you point out, in the end, the vote totals were not too big too rig. I think President Trump would have needed at least 82 million votes to say that was true.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just thinking out loud. If you know your candidate can’t win on her own. And, you know your pathways for rigging the Electoral College are blocked, what is your fallback strategy?

You cheat where you can to create a narrative. The preferred narrative would be that she won the popular vote so the DS can complain the Electoral College is anti-Democratic. Failing that, the narrative we are an equally divided country is their only refuge.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn’t the 2024 result also suggest the rigging was somehow blocked? The 2020 result should have given them cover to inject around 20 million ballots for Harris, but it didn’t happen.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the New York Times is projecting an 81% probability he will win, there won’t need to be multiple sources.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. I got to thinking there are two big factors at play with this 700,000 vote figure.

  1. They pulled out the stops to cheat for Biden and only got to 600,000 votes. And, if I remember correctly their vote totals in PA exceeded registered voters. They probably don’t have enough new registered voters to claim Harris got 700,000 votes.

  2. Some percentage of Biden’s legitimate votes in Philadelphia will vote for President Trump this year which means she has an even larger deficit.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe the landslide is the precipice for the 19% to 21% who are still asleep, but can still be saved.

President Trump has said at least twice 75% of the country is MAGA. Imagine going into this election still believing Biden got 81 million votes. You wake up on November 6th to learn you’re actually in a very small minority. That’s sounds like a precipice.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

This threat actually gives me great comfort. Elon Musk didn’t just simply roll the dice on his personal fortune and business empire. When he bought Twitter he acquired access to a vast amount of information that gives him insight into the true political leanings of Americans.

He also has access to sophisticated information modeling software. He knows MAGA has become too big to rig. That has made him comfortable to come out in support of President Trump and MAGA.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Even Democrat election “guru” Nate Silver called B.S. on the polls. He says the pollsters are going back and using data from older polls to claim the race is still close.

8
TSearch 8 points ago +8 / -0

For some reason I hear B.B. King singing the thrill is gone.

5
TSearch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Every time I force myself to watch a clip of Harris I come away with the same conclusion. She is someone who only knows how to go through the motions.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Over time I’ve come to believe there isn’t a one size fits all precipice. It varies by groups and maybe even individuals.

The massive illegal invasion and the preferential treatment given to illegals was a precipice for Black and Latino Americans.

Out of control inflation has been a precipice for many people.

Vaccine mandates and vaccine injuries have served as a precipice for some people.

The war in the Middle East has been a precipice that shifted Arab and Muslim Americans to endorse President Trump.

The same war and the rise of anti-Semitism under Biden-Harris has been a precipice for Jewish people who typically give their votes to Democrats.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you’re right.

I was just thinking about that strange picture of the Biden’s with the Carter’s. The decode was that Biden’s Administration disasters would be bigger than Carter’s.

It hit me the answer to bigger than Carter should be bigger than Reagan, as in Reagan’s 1984 landslide.

https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0L94Ds/learn-their-commsbigger-than-car/c/

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

People who don’t vote have votes cast using their registration. Registering and not voting makes the late ballot drops possible.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree with your analysis, but believe the machines can be beaten by voter turnout. It’s the late ballot dumps that are the biggest threat.

When you look at the 2020 election, even with pre-set algorithms, vote flipping through adjudication, and flipping some votes at the tabulation stage, it wasn’t enough.

The electronic manipulation that stole the election was achieved through the voter registration databases in the swing states. They “stopped” counting to analyze how many phony paper ballots they needed to drop in the swing states and how many unused voter registrations they had available to backstop them.

Then they dumped ballots into supposedly deep blue states to inflate the popular vote to support the president idea Biden won. Ultimately the steal came down to 44,000 “votes” in three swing states.

It will be fantastic if the electronic vote manipulation is being jammed during this election. But, making it too big to rig ultimately comes down to people using their voter registrations in such high numbers that it’s obvious there are no ballots that still need to be counted.

I believe the turnout is going to be so high there will not be anywhere near enough unused voter registrations to support dropping phony ballots.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›