2
TechScrounger 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need to stop using the opposition's word for these people. They are not "trans women" they are feminized males or transvestites, depending on the degree to which they have feminized their bodies.

2
TechScrounger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suppose secure communications would then have to rely on one-time use random encoded methods with the random code delivered by secure channels (courier). Impractical for a many transactions but still practical for some.

2
TechScrounger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also: "Minor Attracted Pervert"

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me and my family when we caught COVID. It seemed to help. We all had very mild cases of (probably) omicron variant.

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to the article they plan on using chicken byproducts such as blood to raise maggots which will be fed to chickens. This is a natural cycle. Chickens eat maggots all the time. Nowhere does the article mention selling insect protein for human consumption.

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Business opportunity: There is a microwave driven atmospheric plasma gun that can completely burn off the label on the beer can without harming the beer. So just get some of those, pick up the Bud Lite for free, burn off the label and sell it as generic beer. It's a win for everybody. AB doesn't profit and beer drinkers still get their beer.

4
TechScrounger 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think the word you were going for was "countenance".

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The data cited is misleading. They are comparing apples to oranges here. The cancer.org data is divided into two categories: cancer diagnoses and cancer deaths. The cancer death numbers are in the ~30 to 40K range per year. The diagnoses are in the ~300K per year range. Both of these do not show the dramatic increases that this article reports. I encourage everyone to look at the data themselves at cancer.org.

11
TechScrounger 11 points ago +11 / -0

We need to be precise in our language: A woman is a human who possesses XX chromosomes. A mas is a human who possesses XY chromosomes.

  1. An XY human who is attempting to mimic an XX human is a "male human mimicking a female human".
  2. An XY human who has surgically and/or hormonally modified its body to mimic a female human is a "medically feminized male human".
  3. Humans who are sexually attracted to underage humans are not "Minor Attracted Persons" or even "pedophiles". They are potential or actual "child molesters".
5
TechScrounger 5 points ago +5 / -0

The ingredients check out. The Wellness Company is affiliated with Dr. Peter McCullough and other based doctors.

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed! Why not have a parallel voting system? Use paper ballots and ballot scanners that use open source software burned onto PROMS

11
TechScrounger 11 points ago +11 / -0

A good rule is to buy things that you use regularly and rotate through the stocks.

3
TechScrounger 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have noticed that those who didn't get the jab look great by comparison.

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eating or cooking the eggs would likely destroy the antibodies.

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The effect they observed was 1) in vitro, 2) requires that the hen be innoculated with the S1 spike protein prior to laying her eggs. This is essentially poor-mans monoclonal antibodies. They theorize that it could be administered as an aerosol into the naso pharanx bronchial tubes and lungs as a first line defense against the virus.

2
TechScrounger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder if anyone has been plotting the frequency of these events over time. Is it accelerating?

1
TechScrounger 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are plenty of other databases to keep VAERS honest, including VSAFE, insurance claim records, etc.

9
TechScrounger 9 points ago +9 / -0

The argument that those alleging election fraud cannot prove that fraudulent votes actually entered the count drives me crazy. The burden should be on those that run the election to prove that it is impossible for fraudulent votes to enter the count. Consider this analogy: You are playing poker. Suddenly in the middle of the betting, a fire alarm goes off and everyone lays their cards on the table and exits the room. Later, everyone comes back and resumes play. Player A unexpectedly wins the hand and Player B alleges that Player A cheated. Player A retorts, "Prove that I cheated". Of course Player B cannot prove that Player A cheated but everyone knows that cheating was certainly possible. That is why no one gets up and everybody watches until the cards are revealed. I hope that Kari Lake's legal team makes this obvious argument. The election rules are there to prevent the possibility of cheating. If they are not followed, then the election cannot be trusted.

view more: Next ›