1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your link goes to the Hello@X @Kash_Patel, not the plain @Kash_Patel.

You can see Hello@X just below @Kash_Patel - you can see it on this post’s screenshot.

While both accounts have some posts in common, this particular post does not appear on the @Kash_Patel that does not have Hello@X.

Here is the link to the profile page - there is no link to the profile for the Hello@X one

https://x.com/Kash_Patel

0
ThinkItThrough 0 points ago +1 / -1

I cannot find this post on @Kash_Patel on X.

But if I put in Hello@X, it comes up saying @ Kash_Patel with completely different posts. Is Hello@X a fake?

12
ThinkItThrough 12 points ago +12 / -0

It wasn’t the Biden administration. It was New York City.

Posted Nov. 7, 2024

NEW YORK CITY (WABC) -- New York City has announced it will no longer issue vouchers to migrants to pay for food, ending a controversial program that had repeatedly come under attack by conservatives and others.

"As we move towards more competitive contracting for asylum seeker programs, we have chosen not to renew the emergency contract for this pilot program once the one-year term concludes," Mayor Eric Adams's Office said in a statement.

The pilot program distributed debit cards to migrant families staying in city-funded hotels, allowing them to buy their own food.

While the program was characterized by some as an additional expense, it was initially conceived as a way to save money by no longer buying food the asylum seekers did not want to eat. The city estimates it cost half as much as the boxed-meal delivery service it replaced.

Since late March, the city has provided prepaid debit cards totaling $3.2 million to some 2,600 migrant families living in hotels so that they can buy food and baby supplies.

https://abc7ny.com/post/new-york-city-ending-voucher-program-allowed-migrant-families-buy-own-food/15523750/

3
ThinkItThrough 3 points ago +4 / -1

People are also paid by left-wing nut jobs to attack patriots who have an effective voice.

5
ThinkItThrough 5 points ago +6 / -1

🤔 Apparently Candace has been more effective than you can tolerate. You can’t accuse her of sleeping with an underage girl, which is usually the first go-to, so now we have this.

4
ThinkItThrough 4 points ago +4 / -0

My sympathies to the UK. 🙁

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

The US just opened a new military base in Poland on Nov. 13.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-new-us-base-poland-raises-overall-nuclear-danger-2024-11-21/

MOSCOW/WARSAW, Nov 21 (Reuters) - Russia said on Thursday that a new U.S. ballistic missile defence base in northern Poland will lead to an increase in the overall level of nuclear danger, but Warsaw said "threats" from Moscow only strengthened the argument for NATO defences. The air defence base, situated in the town of Redzikowo near the Baltic coast, part of a broader NATO missile shield, was opened on Nov. 13. "This is another frankly provocative step in a series of deeply destabilising actions by the Americans and their allies in the North Atlantic Alliance in the strategic sphere," Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said.

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who would resign if Kash Patel IS appointed is someone we WANT GONE.

Maybe this reduction in our massive government will be easier than we thought. 🤔

7
ThinkItThrough 7 points ago +7 / -0

Putin has previously said that giving Ukraine the green light on missile use would effectively mean that the U.S. and NATO are "in the war."

"Flight assignments for these missile systems can, in fact, only be entered by military personnel from NATO countries. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. And therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is a question of making a decision whether NATO countries directly participate in the military conflict or not," Putin said in September

https://www.foxnews.com/world/ukraine-fires-first-barrage-us-made-long-range-missiles-russia-kremlin-says

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe the bigger factor was limiting fraudulent voting. Either that, or they “let” him win because they have some dastardly thing planned. But I would not want to be on the side opposing President Trump, no matter how dastardly the plan . . .

8
ThinkItThrough 8 points ago +8 / -0

The other objective is to make a large amount of fraudulent votes appear credible and prevent any investigation.

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you actually believe the money was spent on this and not sent to some NGO to fund Antifa/Soros AG campaigns/fraudulent ballots, etc.? I can only imagine how they laugh at the parties they must have where they invent fake programs to supposedly fund in order to get tax-payer money to deep state organizations. I’ll even bet they give prizes to whomever can come up with the most ridiculous, preposterous suggestions.

view more: Next ›