13
ThirstyLibertyTree 13 points ago +13 / -0

My guess is it’s more to cover up depopulation goals of the vax, food shortages, toxic waste, black baggings, etc.

4
ThirstyLibertyTree 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sauce or name of the feed? That’s insidious.

1
ThirstyLibertyTree 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Now you’s can’t leave.”

1
ThirstyLibertyTree 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be great, but any Turing style test will come up with a bot solution in no time. No idea how it would be practical to ban all bots, but it would be interesting to see how the internet looked after that.

2
ThirstyLibertyTree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Layman here. My best guess based on what op said is a packet sniffer. Sounds like he got a hardware based one.

2
ThirstyLibertyTree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not arguing there. Just makes even easier to hide the fraud because humans can’t read QR codes or know what the software counting ballots is even doing. It’s not obviously fraudulent like scanning the same ballots over and over, so it doesn’t matter who the poll watchers are or how closely they’re watching.

2
ThirstyLibertyTree 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a gaggle of pedo fags.

2
ThirstyLibertyTree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stromm Thurman if I remember correctly. That’s the entirety of the “flip.”

by Kokonut
1
ThirstyLibertyTree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Check out the movie Confessions of a Dangerous Mind directed by none other than George Clooney.

14
ThirstyLibertyTree 14 points ago +14 / -0

They would also turn into dark money pits for benefit payouts.

5
ThirstyLibertyTree 5 points ago +5 / -0

While also setting the precedent of yuge fines for misinformation…

by MAGULQ
1
ThirstyLibertyTree 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe AI can generate organic sounding replies, so I wouldn’t totally let my guard down. How long was it actually between your post and the reply? Only shows “1 hour ago” for both for me. The thought just occurred to me we may have to start implementing our own Turing tests that remain random enough the programmers can’t just create a believable response to them for common ways, like asking “are you a bot?” Maybe one for this poster: edit your second reply and use the word “peacock” in a sentence. No idea if a bot has the ability to edit a comment, but seems complex enough for me I would believe they’re real.

3
ThirstyLibertyTree 3 points ago +3 / -0

Already has in my household.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›