1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, so you're saying that DWAC's stock will increase dramatically after President Trump is re-elected, wipes out the cabal, seizes their assets, auctions them off to the public, where DWAC might be able to purchase....something...that will do...what, exactly?...that will greatly improve TruthSocial? or do what, exactly? that will greatly improve its business and therefore make the stocks more valuable?

That's quite a ways away from what you were saying an hour or so ago, which was basically that Trump would seize the assets of Meta, Twitter (maybe), tik tok and other social media sites that are involved in election fraud and shut them down, so TruthSocial would no longer have as much competition, thus performing better in stocks.

0
ThisIsNotMyName 0 points ago +0 / -0

So President Trump will use assets seized from the cabal to auction off and use the proceeds to help his own business?

Do you not see ethical issues with that?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting take. Could you give me some more info about the EO you're speaking of?

I've found several EO's from Trump, some that were never signed, that might be what you're talking about, but don't match what you say exactly.

The closest seems to be Executive Order 13848, but that's about foreign interference in elections, not domestic. Since Facebook and Twitter and all the other businesses you've mentioned are owned by Americans (except TikTok) I'm not sure how that particular EO will be used, since, again, it's specific to foreign election interference.

What foreign countries or parties or businesses do you believe will be involved in election fraud for the 2024 election that will then be sanctioned?

And even so, the sanctions seem to be more geared toward blocking the foreign entities from doing business in the US. They might be able to confiscate any property in the US that was used in facilitating election interference, but I don't see any avenue for the US to claim any property that is based in other countries, such as businesses that are based in other countries, like TikTok.

Also, how do you see Truth Social improving once all these things happen? What changes do you see being made?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the SEC is so helpful in working with Presidents?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why? I've seen several threads about this today.

Could someone please explain what's going to change about Truth Social or DWAC when Trump is reelected?

Is he going to make a law saying everyone will be required to use TS?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't understand what exactly Trump's popularity or his being re-elected has to do with DWAC's pricing.

What will his being re-elected gain, in relation to Truth Social?

Unless he's planning on making it mandatory that people use Truth Social when he's president again, I really don't see how him being president again will change anything in regards to Truth Social.

4
ThisIsNotMyName 4 points ago +4 / -0

As far as I can tell, some musician who had a hit song "Because I got high" like 20 years ago.

4
ThisIsNotMyName 4 points ago +4 / -0

Afroman is a big celebrity?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, why not just come in as an illegal? Then you'll get $2,000 a month and food stamps and a free cell phone and all that other stuff.

How hard can it be to come over illegally?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, you're simply wrong on this. A Republic is a type of democracy. The US is a representative democracy. It's not a matter of opinion. It's a fact. The US government itself says we're a democracy.

I don't know why it has caught on in the last decade that the US isn't a democracy, but it's simply wrong. I don't know if it was a result of HRC saying she won the popular vote or people saying that Trump will "destroy our democracy". Either way, I'm sure Regean is rolling in his grave to hear conservatives/republicans say we're not a democracy.

I think the issue comes down to people thinking the only type of democracy is an absolute democracy, or "mob rule". Where everyone votes directly on every issue.

But that's not what we have. We have a representative democracy, which means we vote for representatives to work on our behalf to run the country.

2
ThisIsNotMyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep seeing people talking about Jubilees and NESARA/GESARA lately. I'm not sure where it's coming from.

I don't think it's from Q. If it is, I missed it.

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think that person looks very masculine, though. And even so, if they saw what they thought was a man enter the lady's room, they should have said something. And there are some very masculine-looking women (who were born female), so why take the chance that you're wrong? And finally, if the employee thought he was a male, trying to pass as a woman, why would they give them an opportunity to claim they were being harassed like this?

What did the employee have to gain by going in there to clean the bathroom right then? Especially when you consider the risks? Anything from them being embarrassed by seeing something they shouldn't, to being fired if someone complained, or even having charges brought against them?

All for what?

4
ThisIsNotMyName 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't see anything wrong with that. That's how it should be done. But this person claims that the employee just came in, and didn't announce themselves or ask if it was ok for them to be in there or anything. I just think that they're lying about it happening, to get attention or to push their agenda.

4
ThisIsNotMyName 4 points ago +4 / -0

But did you do it when women were in there using the bathroom?

6
ThisIsNotMyName 6 points ago +6 / -0

But why is a male employee cleaning the lady's room, anyway? Especially if someone is in there?

I get that people are focused on the whole tranny thing, but really, would anyone be ok with a male employee inside the lady's room if their wife or daughter was in there?

I just don't buy it. I think they're making it up.

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

No idea. And I don't understand why anyone here would be so upset about it, anyway. I would think anyone here who understands that the medical industry can't be trusted wouldn't be so worried about health insurance. Why would anyone who understands how evil the medical industry is willingly pay money to go to them so they can harm you?

President Trump got that stupid clause in the ACA eliminated, where it was saying people either had to have insurance or pay a penalty. So you don't even have to pay a penalty any more if you don't have insurance.

The only thing the medical field is good for is physical accidents, like broken legs.

It makes more sense to take whatever you would pay for health insurance and put it into a separate account just in case you get hurt. There are also Christian-based groups that work somewhat like insurance.

But really, why even be worried over how much health insurance costs if you have enough sense to stay away from doctors?

1
ThisIsNotMyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Taking things into your own hands how? You're not talking about hurting yourself, are you?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›