I'm of two minds on this, since striking down the eviction moratorium will cause quite a bit of pain to some people who don't deserve it. (Yes, they're some free-loaders, but not all!)
But, the decision was based on correct reasoning, that the CDC way over-stretched its authority. CDC has gradually been trying to move into areas like criminal justice, housing and child abuse for several decades, by declaring everything "public health" issues. They deserve this smack!
Dr. Malone has detailed notes on what the two letters from the FDA mean for approval of the jabs. What they're shooting in people's arms is not FDA-approved!
https://files.catbox.moe/a4dwq8.pdf
Dr. Malone's website:
I'm glad to see some of the professional organizations still have some sanity
The American College of Pediatricians, the Catholic Medical Association and a doctor specializing in adolescent care filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee on Thursday against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Caveat: If you check out the tables in the original study, it's important to note that this is a relatively young sample, with a majority under 40 years. They are also pretty healthy---the most frequently mentioned co-morbidity is being overweight (approx. one-third). It would be interesting to see what happens among people with pre-existing health conditions, since some doctors speculate that the vaccination is particularly damaging to patients with auto-immune disorders.
Link to full article: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110475
Going back to the source, it's difficult to tell whether the seizure was because the pills were Ivermectin or whether they were counterfeit (probably happening quite a bit now). The notice says they were "misbranded." 300 pills may also be considered "for resale" vs. personal use. Does the letterhead on this notice look strange to anyone else?
Dr. Robert Malone's website also has an excellent breakdown of the FDA approval decision, and he emphasizes the loss of indemnification as the motive.
https://files.catbox.moe/a4dwq8.pdf
His website:
No, the FDA approval was for a Biotech product called Comirnaty, which isn't even in production yet. The Pfizer trash that they're shooting into people's arms is still under Emergency Use Authorization. Check out today's video on WarRoom w/Dr. Malone. Steve Bannon also said he plans on doing a show on the clotshot this Saturday:
https://rumble.com/search/video?q=warroom%20bannon&date=today
Wrong! The video was from today.
https://rumble.com/search/video?q=warroom%20bannon&date=today
It may not be a bad idea for your niece to officially document this, with an email to the Lab. You never know when someone will come looking for evidence of fraud and incompetence from the PCR-testers. She could also report the Lab to her insurance company, if they paid for her testing.
Assuming that Rasmussen has maintained a stable sampling methodology, I think what's going on here is that there's a fairly limited hardcore group of "true believers," who won't change their minds for anything. (Bet they all have 2 & 3 vaxxs too!) It's comforting to see a significantly larger group who are really hating on Ole Joe. The people who are in the center ("approve," "disapprove," and "don't know") are probably quite whishy-washy about things in the outside world and will change their minds fairly easily.
I realized today that Pfizer having FDA approval is almost a relief. All the "make it up as you go along" for the Emergency Use Authorization was really angering me. Now, at least, we fight the FDA, which has a long body of administrative law we can take advantage of.
So short term, it doesn't look good, particularly with all those lawsuits filed which depend upon the right to refuse an EUA jab. But, with FDA approval, Pfizer can no longer tinker around with its jab formulas, and we won't be seeing new vaxxs (i.e., Novavax) coming in under an EUA. Our enemies are no longer moving targets!
Vioxx!!! (Monsanto & Merck)
"Vioxx was once a popular drug to treat arthritis. But manufacturer Merck & Co. pulled it from the market in 2004 amid safety concerns. Research linked the drug to thousands of fatal heart attacks.
"Before it was removed from the market in 2004, Vioxx may have hurt hundreds of thousands of patients, killing a third of them, a senior FDA investigator said at the time."
My understanding is that after FDA approval, what's in the vial must match the approved formula or they can be sued for malfeasance. Under EUA, they can put anything they want into the formula---including graphene, saline, etc. Any deviation from what was approved has to go through the whole process again.
So now, we're in this insane (but maybe good for us!) situation, where the vaccine doesn't work against the variants. Since there's an FDA approved drug, which is "safe and effective," no additional new "vaccine" drugs can come in under an EUA, unless it's declared "unsafe" and "ineffective."
They're just doing it now to undercut all the lawsuits, which argue against the legality of mandates under EUA status. It will be worst for the military, college students, teachers and medical workers---until we get lawsuits going with updated arguments.
On a more positive note, FDA approval should make additional information on the vaccine available, and Pfizer won't be able to change formulations (like I think they may be doing).
CDC has been spreading into areas beyond infectious disease for decades! Dr. Tom Coburn, the late Senator from Oklahoma, used to write critical reports of how the CDC went way beyond its mandate. Now, they're major players in chronic and preventive disease, health-related surveys, addiction (through Naloxone), school health (through school-based clinics), domestic abuse and violence. Very scary people, who collect and fund a ton of data on every conceivable topic.