2
VaccinesCauseSIDS 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have a certain way of talking…

1
VaccinesCauseSIDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem is, i dont think i could prove im an American, if anyone asked me to do so.

1
VaccinesCauseSIDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their phony concern for unvaccinated africans is vomit inducing

1
VaccinesCauseSIDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Iraq had developed them, then the US would have had cause to bomb iraq

4
VaccinesCauseSIDS 4 points ago +4 / -0

What if… we identify an “illegal alien”… and we know where they are from,

we take care of them as temporary guests,

BUT… we send the bill to their home country.

It would work like child support.

And shared visitation

6
VaccinesCauseSIDS 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh it gets even worse, when you think it thru.

Our governments COULD operate on CASH, but instead they operate on CREDIT.

So our different levels of government BORROW money, at interest, and then TAX YOU, not to pay the principal, but to pay THE INTEREST.

Basically, the Fed (Roth) “lends” money to US government for stupid shit like funding a war in Ukraine or Israel,

And then the Fed extracts interest payments from the people, in the form of taxes.

Recently this scheme crossed into uncharted territory, where the taxes extracted from taxpayers was not enough to cover all the interest payments

In any other scenario, they would call this “insolvency” which is what happens just before bankruptcy.

TLDR: USURY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL

1
VaccinesCauseSIDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

The metaphor “Prove a man is a thief, then show he is a bank robber” means that once you have established someone’s guilt or propensity for a smaller or less severe crime (being a thief), it becomes easier to convince others of their involvement in a larger or more serious crime (being a bank robber). Essentially, it suggests that proving a smaller wrongdoing can lay the groundwork for convincing people of a greater wrongdoing, leveraging the initial proof to establish a pattern or likelihood of further misconduct.

In broader terms, the metaphor can be applied to various situations where establishing a person’s fault or bad behavior in a minor case can lead to the assumption or acceptance of their guilt in more significant matters. It emphasizes the cumulative effect of evidence and how initial proof can influence the perception of subsequent allegations.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›